1996 Project Reports | Home | Contents | Previous | Next |


Bone remodeling simulations - validation using quantitative computed tomography

Gary Beaupré, PhD; Greg Breit, PhD; Robert Whalen, PhD; Dennis Carter, PhD; John Drace, MD; Virginia Giddings, MS; Jenny Kiratli, PhD; Sandy Napel, PhD; Inder Perkash, MD; George Sims, MD; Chye Hwang Yan, MS


Our understanding of how bone adapts in response to mechanical stimuli has expanded considerably in the past ten years in large part because of the development of new mathematical-based theories for bone remodeling. Some of these theories have undergone preliminary validation through computer simulations of bone development, adaptation from altered loading, and bone remodeling after prosthetic implantation. While the majority of these validation studies have been qualitative in nature, they have suggested new insights into the mechanical factors that influence skeletal biology. In spite of these advances there is a compelling need for additional, quantitative validation studies.

With the help of collaborators in the Departments of Radiology, Spinal Cord Injury and Orthopaedics we have begun a study that will use data obtained from VA patients to validate and refine the bone remodeling theory developed at the VA Rehabilitation R&D Center and Stanford University. The patients participating in this study have sustained either a spinal cord injury or an ankle fractures. Both of these patient groups experience significant bone loss (osteoporosis) in the heel bone of the foot. We are measuring the amount of bone loss in these patients since their injury, using a very precise technique called Quantitative Computed Tomographym or QCT (Fig. 1). Using QCT we can monitor not only the total amount of bone loss but also the distribution of bone loss throughout the internal volume of the heel bone. By comparing the measured bone loss with the predictions from computer models we can validate and refine our bone remodeling algorithm with an accuracy and precision never previously achieved.

CT scan

Figure 1. CT scan of the calcaneus (heel bone).

Another important question that we are examining in this study concerns the extent to which bone loss is reversible. Our QCT measurement in patients with ankle fractures should help to answer this question. Some of the bone that was lost during the cast immobilization phase should be recovered after cast removal. However, it is possible that complete recovery of bone mass will not occur in some patients. While the reasons for this are not entirely clear, the ability to monitor bone mass in patients using QCT will allow us to examine the role of mechanical forces in the process of bone recovery and possibly suggest new rehabilitation strategies.


Republished from the 1996 Rehabilitation R&D Center Progress Report. For current information about this project, contact: Gary Beaupré.

Button Bar

People Projects Publications Resources Home