Q&A: Difficult citations of United States Public Laws


I have the following citation from the LexisNexis Congressional Publications database:

TITLE: Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984
CIS-NO: 84-PL98-473 (Title II)
DOC-TYPE: Legislative History
DATE: Oct. 12, 1984
LENGTH: 224 p.
ENACTED-BILL: 98 H.J.Res. 648
STAT: 98 Stat. 1976

I want to get a copy of the actual law called the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984. A librarian told me that P.L. stood for Public Law, that 98 was the Congress that passed it, that 473 was the law number for that Congress, and that these laws could all be found in the Statutes At Large set in the Green Library Information Center. I went to the Public Law set in Green Library, but when I looked up law number 473 for the 98th Congress, it seemed to be about the Dept. of Interior and has nothing at all to do with crime control. Is the citation incorrect?


The citation is correct, but this particular Public Law is one of those so-called omnibus bills, that has a large number of legal acts and appropriations in them, none of them necessarily related to one another. This is why lawyers usually give their citations based on the Statutes At Large number, rather than the Public Law number. The Statutes At Large listing for this item is that part of your citation that goes as follows:

STAT: 98 Stat. 1976

So if you go back to the same volume [98] you were in before, and look at page 1976, you will find the text of the law you want, starting under the heading "Title II". Note that the Statutes At Large listing cites the volume and page, not the Congress. In this particular case, the volume number and the Congress number are the same, but this is accidental, and isn't usually the case.

A very efficient way to handle such citations for the Statutes At Large is to do it electronically, in the database called HeinOnline. In that database:

  • Click on Subscribers Click Here to Enter.
  • Click on U.S. Statutes At Large, under Subscribed Libraries.
  • In the Citation Navigator, on the far left, type 98 for the volume and 1976 for the page.

The search engine will take you to the exact page in the volume you want.

Find Law/Legal Resources

Reference articles from our online Reference Resources:

Books on Legal Rhetoric

Sample search terms in Searchworks:

Current Events, Hot Topics and Debate Issues

  • Facts on File: good overview of events, Issues and Controversies on Hot Topics, like treatment of detainees; Human Rights; Healthcare Reform; Separation of Church and State in US; Gun Control; International Criminal Court; Civil Liberties on War on Terror; Right to Die; Detainees' Rights, etc.
  • The debatabase book [electronic resource] : a must-have guide for successful debate
  • Publications for National Debaters: Finding Both Sides of an Issue

Recommended Law databases - United States:

Recommended Law databases - International:

Recommended Websites:

  • Official site of the Supreme Court of the U.S.:Provides general information, opinions, term orders, argument calendar, schedules, court rules, bar admission forms and instructions, case-handling guides, special notices, biographies of current and past justices, architectural details, and press releases. Includes a search engine for finding documents.
  • Supreme Court Collection : Search this site for U.S. Supreme Court decisions. Includes an archive of decisions going back to 1990 (searchable by topic, justice, and party), highlights of the present term, a glossary, Supreme Court rules, and more. From the Legal Information Institute (LII) at Cornell Law School.
  • Oyez: U.S. Supreme Court Case Summaries, Oral Arguments & Multimedia: The Oyez Project is a multimedia archive devoted to the Supreme Court of the United States and its work. It aims to be a complete and authoritative source for all audio recorded in the Court since the installation of a recording system in October 1955. The Project also provides authoritative information on all justices and offers a virtual reality 'tour' of portions of the Supreme Court building, including the chambers of some of the justices.

Syndicate content