W.F. Sharpe, Retirement Economics, October 2005
(Slides from a presentation at the Pension and Investments Defined
Contribution 401(k) Conference)
Slides
from a presentation
arguing that expected utility theory can lead to practical
implications for strategies and products designed for those who have
retired. In particular, theory suggests that some retirees might desire
to purchase an insurance product that integrates an annuity with
long-term care insurance to provide payoffs not possible with separate
purchases of traditional annuities and long-term care insurance
products.
A working paper designed to
provide a
formal framework for finding the most desirable post-retirement
financial
plan for an individual or family.
A working
paper showing that in a complete market setting, any post-retirement i
nvestment and spending strategy can be implemented by setting up a
series of lockboxes, one for each future year. Each box will have an
initial amount of money and an investment strategy to be followed until
its designated maturity year. At that point the investments are
liquidated and the proceeds spent. Such an approach allows a retiree to
act "in loco parentis" for his or her "future self", which may provide
some protection against financial mistakes that could be made in later
years.
A paper that contrasts the financial economists' expected utility
approach with rules of thumb adopted by some practitioners. The
analysis shows that some popular rules are inconsistent with expected
utility maximization since they subject retirees to unavoidable
non-market risk. The paper also describes the lockbox approach to
retirement investing and spending.
An article by Bill Snyder describing some of my work on Post-retirement
economics