![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
| HISTORY - GOVERNMENT | |||||||||||
|
"The Empire has its basis in the
state, the
state in the family, and the family in one’s own self.” – Mencius |
|||||||||||
![]() |
The
government actively standardized familial practices in China and thus
influenced the Chinese family. Its
structure
and Confucian view of the government also reinforced the family dynamic
of the
father as the authoritarian, and the females as followers who must be
loyal and
obedient. Not only
that, but the system
of obtaining a government position through high scores on standardized
tests
and loyalty to the state reinforced the Chinese work ethic, the Chinese
focus
on learning and studying hard, and filial piety.
During
the Han dynasty (206-220 BC), government scholar officials endorsed the
Three
Bonds, as Wei-Ming Tu states in his article “Probing the ‘Three Bonds’
and
‘Five Relationships’,” “as an integral part of the core curriculum for
moral
education. The
Three Bonds, a Confucian
value set that delineated the authority of the ruler over the minister,
the
father over the son, and the husband over the wife, mostly applied to
the
household. However,
the Chinese government,
in focusing on promoting the first portion of the Three Bonds for
stability in
government, also simultaneously then ingrained the idea of the
authority of the
father over the son and husband over the wife in Chinese citizens. The Three Bonds became “a
mechanism of
symbolic control…[its] primary purpose…[was] social stability” (Tu). To further
reinforce social stability, as
Patricia Ebrey describes in her article “Women, Marriage, and the
Family in
Chinese History,” the Han government also elevated the status of family
heads:
they were given titles, had official authority over wives and children,
and
held them responsible for the fiscal situation of the family. In doing so, the Han
government essentially
drew a parallel from the government with the ruler at its head to the
family
with the father at its head, indirectly ingraining into citizens the
parallel
idea that as children and wives are obedient and loyal to their
families and
their father, citizens need to be obedient and loyal to the state. While
the government directly influenced the family by promoting certain
Confucian
values, the government structure itself also reinforced the family
dynamic and
certain traditional Chinese values.
The
merit-based Han dynasty was influential in crafting the Chinese work
ethic and
focus on learning and studying hard due to the fact that social,
economic, and
geographic mobility were high in the early Han dynasty (Ebrey). Those who studied hard and
got good scores on
tests were able to work in the government, achieving social status and
economic
improvement. Also,
filial piety, an
important Confucian principle of having love and respect for one’s
parents and
ancestors, came to be a factor in obtaining government positions. Filial piety “came to be
considered a political
virtue” since it could macrocomiscally be applied as loyalty to the
emperor,
and thus, showing a lot of filial piety became “an adequate basis for
recruitement to government office” (Ebrey).
Hard work, learning, filial piety, and managerial
success then became
associated with prosperity, and thus, people highly valued hard work,
studying,
and filial piety.
The
government was a macrocosmic family with its ruler as the father/head
of the
household. Since,
as Walter H. Slote
says in his article, “Psychocultural Dynamics within the Confucian
Family,” the
power of…rulers approached the absolute,” people began to perceive that
the
microcosmic government head—the father of the family—had absolute power
as
well. The ruler’s
duties included being
“the interpreter, executor, and judge of the moral code…[basically
having] full
responsibility for the stability and harmony of society,” and thus, the
father
came to be viewed as the disciplinarian and authoritarian of the home
(Tu).
The
political arena basically became “inseparable from the ethical realm,”
and so
what people did at home became “politically significant” (Tu). Therefore, the ancient
Chinese government and
how people acted toward it was extremely influential and intertwined
with the
family dynamics of ancient China. |
||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
Help
us out!
![]() |
Site
Map About the Site |
Sophia
Tsai |
|||||||||