The Sand Hill Review http://www.stanford.edu/~sandhill 2005
To
Keat’s Urn
Sylvan historian, who canst thus express
A flowery tale more sweetly than
our rhyme
—John
Keats
And
none more sweet than your rhyme, John Keats,
and none more true to love and beauty,
none more unabashed in heart and song.
And,
whether by chance or not, each time
we come back to it, we find ourselves
savoring what we have overthrown,
and find ourselves warmed and delighted¾
but then puzzled, disturbed, as the why?
of our rejecting settles on us.
We
are not inclined to let you stay,
with your songs to beauty, your young heart,
so knowing are we of love’s deceit
and so precious to us our despair.
(Even I will disarrange these words
of their music, for I’d have them seen.)
You
are the unheard melody now;
you, the lost lesson, the last teacher
of the heart truly broken by love.
When
you put your words against the loss,
words where soft flesh might have been a life,
and carved your white urn of poesy
for turning this way and that in changed
light, and put all your burning heart’s truth
to the test of joy and forever,
and to the test of friendship amidst
our later woe, how could you have known
you gave to us too much of beauty?
* * *
in
our time, John,
we never speak in capitals
you won’t catch us writing
Beauty, Truth
(Love or Heart)
we never sing
in our time
we make facts, factoids, texts,
and contexts
even our eyes write modest
little pictures
and our tongues lull
the language
everyone, John, keeps the
sublime
from themselves or
failing
to themselves
(themselves closet for
its bones)
there are almost no poets
(as you knew them)
nor poems
(as you knew them)
instead a surfeit of texts
strange forays
into the narrows of
irony
or across the barrens
of intellect
(prairies of silence)
(why make a sound a
poem at all?)
so that chisled into this modern urn
is
our overwrought
intelligence
our well-worked
humility
nothing yearning,
nothing needing
to break
free
in our time we know
terrible things about the world
that is
ourselves
we know
the whole of human
existence
is the flicker of a
wing
we
know
the earth dies in the
arms of our sun
then our sun, then our
universe¾
in blackness or white
fire
and know
no god is required
and know so well
our own made means to
ends
our chemistries and
pestilences
our death camps and
fire storms
our fabulous
machineries
(realities, John,
unimaginable)
and
have known already
a hundred years of
death
it so loosed upon us by us
so lodged
in the human voice
that in our time
we cannot sing
or dare not sing
or would not
sing
and songless, our eyes have everything to take
on
and, it being everything, they
cannot bear up
the
images soon unravel
the eyes fix blindly
to a stare
the poems are now unstirring air
(and we know no god
was required)
* * *
Forever and decay is where the error
is.
How
you could not abide the downward flux,
how love would not stay love nor beauty, beauty;
how you wrote consummately the unconsummated
moment toward eternity and found some solace there:
the lips nearly kissed, the youthful bodies nearly coupled,
eternal fairness, love and longing and spirit ditties
fixed in a stone of words, in a bittersweet protection.
I
have spent my twenty years of passion
husbanding the same foolishness of heart:
that words
would win and hold or prove or perpetuate
what was as fleeting as my lover’s heightened breath.
I
made fine words. To no avail. And made a suffering
where with but a letting go I could have kissed a timeless joy.
* * *
And
I think too
of Blake’s other law¾
how a grain of sand is
a universe
and the Universe a
grain of sand
how therefore every
poem
must seek the Tyger
how that Symmetry
must always threaten
how there is no poem
small enough to hide in
how no life is small
though the village is
empty now
how the huge sings in
the smallest
atom, the smallest life
and how in these
a huge song waits to
sing out.
David
Cummings