Dichotomous Thinking:
January 12, 2007

Gender is so fundamental to society that we take many beliefs about it for granted. Much of what we call "common sense" is an elaborate social construction, and we begin this course with a general discussion of how such construction is accomplished. We begin with biology - while gender is commonly presented as a simple outcome of biology, it is actually an ideological construction that builds on biology. Even the division of the animal kingdom into male and female is an interpretation of biology rather than a scientific truth. And this interpretation emerges from, and supports, the fact that the categories of male and female are fundamental to our culture's gender order. But inasmuch the male-female dichotomy is a product of ideology, it needs to be the object - not the starting point - of research.

Class Slides PDF

Readings

Today's readings will provide an introduction to the relation between sex and gender, which will serve as a basis for the examination of language for the rest of the course.

Read Eckert and McConnell-Ginet, Introduction and Chapter 1

Check out the news story about the athlete who "failed" the gender test.

     Here's the the BBC account
     The Gay.com article has fewer words, but more information.

Visit these sites to gain some understanding of the issues raised by intersexed people:
      The Intersex Society of North America
      The UK Intersex Association

Purely Optional: Other things you might be interested in reading about the biology of sex/gender:

Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York, Basic Books.
Roughgarden, J. (2005). Evolution's rainbow: Diversity, gender, and sexuality in nature and people. Berkeley, University of California Press.

There will be a viewing of the PBS program on sex reassignment in babies: Sex Unknown. You can also visit the NOVA companion website to this film.