The Structure of Conversation
January 29, 2007

Conversation is highly structured, and people's ability to get their stuff on the table depends on their ability to make strategic use of conversational conventions. First and foremost is the structure of turn-taking, and people's ability to get, hold, and allocate the floor. Different people and communities of practice may have very different styles of conversation, and different cultures may have quite different conversational conventions altogether. Today's class begins with the nuts and bolts of conversational turn-taking, and moves on to a few conversational devices.

Class Slides PDF

Readings

This paper by Scott Kiesling examines how dude is used to construct masculinity. Dude.American Speech. 79,3: 281-305.

Purely Optional

You might also want to visit Scott's dude page

The following is a very old paper on gender and conversational interaction. I recommend it because it gives a nice introduction to the analysis of conversation without getting too technical, and applies the methods of conversation analysis to a bit of male-female talk. http://www.pitt.edu/~kiesling/dude/dude.html
Zimmerman, D. and C. West (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. B. Thorne and N. Henley. Rowley MA, Newbury House. 105-29.

Here is Deborah Tannen's more recent article on interpreting interruptions in conversation. This article, which includes a critique of Zimmerman and West, will give you a feel for the complexities of interpreting conversational overlaps:
Tannen, D. (1994). Interpreting interruption in conversation. Gender and Discourse. New York, Oxford University Press.

Here is Carol Edelsky's paper on the situated nature of gender differences in turn-taking. Who's got the floor? Language in Society 10. 383-421.