FS101/History 173C, “Introduction to Feminist Studies”
                            Small Group Instructions

 
 

Process:

 
At the first group meeting, the following format is strongly recommended (based on prior student evaluations):  each student should have 5-10 minutes of uninterrupted time to introduce her/himself, stating something about personal background and motivations for taking the course, responses to feminism, or concerns about the subject matter. After each student has spoken, the group members can ask questions or respond.   At subsequent sessions, the group can decide whether to follow the uninterrupted time format or to open  to general discussion.  In either case, it is a good idea to appoint a different member as time-keeper for each  session, to keep others to the limit and/orto keep track of how long the group runs.

It is the responsibility of all group members to try to assure equal time for each member to speak.  Listening is as important as speaking in the group. Practice attentive listening at the first meeting.  If some students are more vocal and others more quiet, use the uninterrupted time to start off each week to encourage participation.  The group might want to discuss the dynamics of participation if anyone feels that conversation is too weighted towards certain speakers, topics, or points of view.  Each group should devote part of one session (week of October 18) to an evaluation of group process.
 

Confidentiality and Content:

 
Small groups must be respectful of confidentiality.  No one is required to reveal personal thoughts or experiences--only share what you are comfortable sharing.  At the first session, each group should establish a rule of confidentiality, that is, that any information that is shared remains within the group unless the speaker gives permission to repeat it outside the group.
 
Small groups provide a space to talk with peers, away from faculty, about the personal issues raised by this course.  Although groups are not intended to analyze readings per se--that task will be covered in sections--students are encouraged to refer to readings, lectures, and films in their discussions.  In groups, your own experiences, whether in families, schools, or work places, can be discussed to the extent that you are comfortable doing so.
 
Your group can generate its own topics for discussion, or you can use questions raised in lecture or section.  The instructors will make suggestions each week for possible small group topics.  In the past, some groups have used responses to newspaper articles or events on campus to stimulate discussion.  Others have told parts of their life stories as they relate to that week's topic in class.  Many students report that groups allowed them to see the ways that their responses to the issues raised in class were similar, or different, from those of other students.  Respect for different cultural backgrounds and life experiences is, of course, critical to small group process.
 
The following list suggests some possible topics, geared to course issues, that you might use at the first or subsequent meetings:
 
1.     What kind of gender socialization did you experience in your family (models, training, warnings, etc.)?  Any differences between male and female siblings?  What gender roles did you observe in your family and community?
 
2.     How do you think that your race, class, ethnicity, or religious training influenced your gender identity?  How does the combination affect your response to what you are learning?
 
3.     Have you ever had an experience of "unlearning" racism, homophobia, or other forms of discrimination, that is, when your preconceptions about others, or yourself, have been changed by new information or experience?
 
4.     What kinds of work experiences have you had, in the family and the paid labor sphere, and what have you experienced in terms of gender expectations and opportunities?  Do you think gender will make any difference in your future work and family goals?
 
 
Assignments:
 
Only one set of readings is required for small groups (Allen "Free Space," Restikis, "Resistance to CR", and Uttal, "Nods That Silence," in RDR and listed on syllabus after 9/29).  These short essays should be completed before the first small group meeting to give a sense of the process and issues raised by small group discussions.
 
Each student is required to submit a 4-5 page (ungraded) paper reviewing each meeting of the small group and the overall experience.  The paper is due on the last day of class, December 1st.  To prepare for writing this paper, I strongly recommend that each student keep a journal or a set of notes about each meeting, preferably written soon after the session. A few paragraphs each week on what you learned from the experience, from others, and how this learning related to the lectures, readings, and films, will provide the bulk of your evaluation paper, along with overall reflections on the group process.  Specific guidelines for the paper will be distributed in class at the end of November.  Keeping a journal will allow this paper to write itself for the most part; students have reported that it is critical to record your reflections each week.
 
If you have questions about small group, bring them up with the instructors.  You may also raise questions about small group process in the group, especially when you do your mid-quarter evaluations of the group.