
My work demonstrates that understanding the geomorphologic setting of the Formative Period site of Chavín de Huántar, in the Central Andean highlands, is critical to archaeological interpretation of the site. This is true both in the fairly obvious terms of archaeological methodology and in the more subtle context of human-environment interactions in prehistory. Moreover, while postdepositional/taphonomic challenges posed by geomorphologic processes have been recognized previously, the true scope of those problems and the implications they have, have not previously been fully recognized nor explored.
Chavín de Huántar is set at 3150 m in a high valley on the eastern slope of the Central Andes’ Cordillera Blanca. The Middle Formative Period site is a sprawling complex of monumental stone construction, unique in the region in its scale and sophistication. Archaeological investigation of the site began in earnest with Julio C. Tello’s visit in 1919, continued when Wendell Bennett carried out the first scientific excavations at Chavín in 1939, and has burgeoned in the near-century since. The fundamental archaeological questions remain much the same today as they were when Tello and Bennett began to work at the site: understanding the sociopolitical dynamics that made Chavín’s construction possible and assessing Chavín’s place—chronologically and in systemic terms—in the larger panorama of Central Andean prehistory.

I argue that in order to address either of these questions adequately, the geomorphology of the area must be understood as a dynamic element of the Chavín-period landscape, and construction activity at Chavín must be understood as existing in a reciprocal relationship to the local environment. That is, cultural activity in the valley was structured by the local environment, but also substantially altered that environment, changing the structuring conditions.
My dissertation research addresses the process of recognition of geomorphologic issues at the site, means of tackling the postdepositional challenges they present, and the project of reconstructing the Chavín-period (approximately 1500-500 BC) landscape and associated reciprocal human-environment interactions in the area. I stress the need to integrate archaeological and geomorphologic data, and the necessity of a fieldwork strategy that reflects the input of both sorts of information. Methodologically, this has meant incorporating excavation and survey data and geomorphic mapping, using GIS to integrate the heterogenous data sources.
|
Data |
Acquisition |
Spatial
Referents |
Projection and
Datum |
|
Topography |
Carta Nacional 1:100,000, Instituto Geogáfico Nacional |
UTM coordinates |
Transverse Mercator; Provisional La Canoa 1956 (Venezuela) |
|
Topography |
Total station |
Proyecto Stanford local grid |
Proyecto Stanford Site Datum |
|
Topography |
Differential GPS |
Proyecto Stanford local grid[1] |
|
|
Imagery |
IKONOS |
Georeferenced to UTM |
Tranverse Mercator; PSAD 1956 |
|
Imagery |
Aerial photographs (SAN 1956 and 1998) |
Visual |
|
|
Architectural features |
Total station |
Proyecto Stanford local grid |
Proyecto Stanford Site Datum |
|
Local paths and other valley sites |
Handheld GPS |
UTM |
Tranverse Mercator; WGS 1984 |
|
Proyecto Stanford Excavations |
Total station |
Proyecto Stanford local grid |
Proyecto Stanford Site Datum |
|
Modern crop distributions |
Handheld GPS |
UTM |
Tranverse Mercator; WGS 1984 |
|
Pre-Stanford excavations |
Published data |
Published maps and descriptions (accuracy and detail
variable) |
Variable |
|
Local geomorphology |
Aerial photographs (SAN 1956 and 1998) and handheld GPS |
Visual and UTM |
Tranverse Mercator; WGS 1984 |
|
Monument and protected area boundaries |
INC plans |
UTM |
|
|
Regional geology |
INGEMMET 1:100,000 Mapa Geológico del Cuadrángulo de
Recuay |
UTM |
Tranverse Mercator; unspecified (presumably either
Venezuela 1956 or WGS 1984) |
[1] Data had been converted to local site grid, and had to be back-converted to UTM coordinates for integration into the site GIS.