The Right Stuff:

SUSE's Policy Analysis and Evaluation Program

combines academics with real world realities.

 by Bob Hass 

How many graduate programs can boast that 100 percent of their

graduates find jobs in their area of study? The Policy Analysis and

Evaluation Program in Stanford's School of Education can. Though only six

years old, for the past three the program has been ranked the number one

policy analysis program in the country by US News and World Report.

The program offers students two areas of concentration, one in

policy analysis and the other in evaluation. The master's in policy

analysis prepares students to formulate educational policy or conduct

policy-relevant research. The program in evaluation prepares participants

to design studies, collect and analyze data, and report evaluation

findings.


Unlike some graduate programs that rely on teaching assistants,

students are taught by Stanford faculty, who rank among the top experts in

their fields. This is possible because the program's size has been kept

small. Graduates in both programs assume positions in local, state,

regional, national, or international agencies and organizations. For

example, recent graduates are now working for the U.S Department of

Education, state departments of education, politicians, research

laboratories, foundations, and universities. (See sidebar for portraits of

three program alums.)


Much of the credit for the program's success goes to its director,

Professor David Fetterman, who helped create the program back

in 1991. And his philosophy about what constitutes sound pedagogy

continues to shape the program today. "You have to ground strong

academic training in the real world, and you have to demonstrate

caring in all your interactions with students. Our students are the

reason we're here. We must take the time to work with

them one-on-one and in small groups, nurturing their talents and

diplomatically but firmly correcting mistakes and misunderstandings.

Everyone is expected to produce first-rate work-the stakes in education and

in society in general are too high to do any less."


At the heart of the program is a year-long project that is directly

linked to educational practice. Policy analysis students take on paid

internships with companies such as Hewlett-Packard or Apple Computer, and

educational policy and research facilities like EdSource. Evaluation

students conduct a paid evaluation project which becomes the focal point

for their course work. All of the students' readings, exercises, and

discussions use these real-world projects as a "reality check" against

which to assess what they are learning in the classroom.


A year-long seminar for all students helps emphasize the

interconnections between policy and evaluation. In addition, policy

students also attend a separate seminar where they investigate national

educational issues such as vouchers, teacher standards, systemic reform,

and privatization. "Each year we also add special topics depending on

what's most prominent," explains Fetterman. "For example, last year we

added ebonics, and the year before that we looked at the Edison Project."


When students first enter the program, Fetterman explains his

"three-tiered" training approach, which includes a focus on academics,

technology, and jobs. The three strands are carefully interwoven throughout

all areas of the program. On the program's homepage, for example, Professor

Fetterman has included links to a host of professional associations,

educational research organizations and laboratories, and employment

databases. Having all these resources at their fingertips motivates

students to begin using the Internet, learning how to conduct on-line

research, and familiarizing themselves with the wide array of job

possibilities awaiting graduates in their field.


Not only do students become proficient at conducting research on

the Internet; they also learn how to construct their own homepages. There

they "publish" information they have found on specialized topics, which is

then available to others in the program. One of their first projects is to

prepare resumes and educational policy briefs that are critiqued by

program faculty. Another project gives students experience posting messages

in their own virtual classroom on the Internet, which can be accessed by

anyone in the program.


Fetterman also coaches students on how to take advantage of

potential networking opportunities. "Oftentimes students communicate via

e-mail with experts in the field, or attend special dinners with policy and

evaluation professionals," says Fetterman. "We want students to be aware

that while they are learning about academics, it may also be appropriate to

learn about career opportunities."


The Policy Analysis and Evaluation Program is one of four degree

granting programs within the School's department of Administration and

Policy Analysis. According to Professor Michael Kirst, department chair,

the nature of the department has shifted over the past five years due to

the influx of master's degree students. "At the School of Education,

educational policy and evaluation have always been linked. In the past,

however, the link has been subtle and mostly implicit. Now we are

making the link explicit. Policy is put to the test and informed by

solid evaluation efforts, and the challenge of conducting an evaluation

is continually tested by the political realities associated with educational

policy. Programs like ours recognize this synergistic relationship, and

program directors like David help to keep us honest by immersing

students in the real world."


© 1997 School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.