Zhuo (Albert) Huang
Job Market Candidate

Ph.D. in Economics, 2010 expected
M.S. in Financial Mathematics, 2008

Stanford University
Department of Economics
579 Serra Mall
Stanford, CA 94305
650-862-7690
alberthz@stanford.edu




Curriculum Vitae


Fields:
Financial Econometrics, Financial Economics   Empirical Finance, Applied Econometrics


Expected Graduation Date:
June, 2010




Thesis Committee:

Peter Reinhard Hansen
peter.hansen@ stanford.edu

Han Hong:
doubleh@stanford.edu

Frank A. Wolak:
wolak@zia.stanford.edu

Research

Realized GARCH: A Joint Model of Return and Realized Measures of Volatility (with P. Hansen and H. Shek)
(Job Market Paper)

GARCH models have been successful in modeling financial returns. Still, much is to be gained by incorporating a realized measure of volatility in these models. In this paper we introduce a new framework for the joint modeling of returns and realized measures of volatility. The Realized GARCH framework nests standard GARCH models as special cases and is, in many ways, a natural extension of standard GARCH models. We pay special attention to Realized GARCH models with linear and log-linear specifications of the GARCH and measurement equations. This class of models has several attractive features. It retains the simplicity and tractability of the classical GARCH framework; it implies an ARMA structure for the conditional variance and realized measures of volatility; and models in this class are parsimonious and simple to estimate. A key feature of the Realized GARCH framework is a measurement equation that relates the observed realized measure to latent volatility. This equation facilitates a simple modeling of the dependence between returns and future volatility that is commonly referred to as the leverage effect. We derive the asymptotic properties of the QMLE estimator and show that it has a Gaussian limit distribution. An empirical application with DJIA stocks and an exchange traded index fund shows that a simple Realized GARCH structure leads to substantial improvements in the empirical fit over to the standard GARCH model. This is true in-sample as well as out-of-sample. Moreover, the point estimates are remarkable similar across the different time series.

The Impact of Market Structure Changes and Increasing Environmental Concerns on the Heat Arbitrage Relationship between Natural Gas and Crude Oil Prices
(selected as the Best PhD Candidacy Paper Award in the Economics Department at Stanford in 2007
)


Natural gas and crude oil are substitute fuels in industrial, manufacturing and residential sectors, suggesting a possible heat arbitrage relationship between natural gas and oil prices. However, the extent to which natural gas can substitute for oil has been historically limited by the market regulation, additional capital costs and supply security of natural gas. This explains, in the US, why natural gas was sold at a lower price per heat unit than oil. Changes in market structures and increasing environmental concerns have favored the use of natural gas as fuel since the 1990s and therefore changed the natural gas and oil prices dynamics. In this paper, I use cointegration models with structural change to identify this effect. The empirical results, consistent to my economic explanations, show that (i) there exists a long run cointegration relationship between US oil and natural gas prices in which oil prices lead gas prices; (ii) during the 1991-2006 period, the relative prices of natural gas to oil have been significantly greater than those of 1976-1990; (iii) natural gas prices moved significantly closer to oil prices after 1990, owing to the increased fuel switching flexibility between natural gas and oil in the power generation and manufacturing
sectors.

The Real-time Announcement Effects of Crude Oil Inventory Changes on Oil Futures Return and Volatility

(work in progress)
The working and efficiency of commodity futures exchanges has been a focus of debate during recent years. Using high frequency oil futures trading prices, this paper documents three empirical facts: (i) real-time volatilities for oil futures increase before and after the weekly inventory announcements and jumps typically follow large inventory changes. (ii) Futures prices only respond to inventory change surprises but not expected changes measured by market analyst consensus. (iii) The futures market absorbs new information very fast: the response vanishes within 10 minutes, even faster than the 15 minutes of stock market index.