Space
Detectives Find Proof for Dark Matter
Colliding galaxy clusters reveal
dark matter
by W. Maria Wang
The
line between reality and science fiction is becoming increasingly
blurred in the seemingly vast emptiness of space, where a mysterious
force prevents galaxies from flying apart. Sound like a Twilight Zone
episode? According to Einstein's theory of gravity, most galaxies are
missing visible mass required to account for their rotation speeds.
Consequently, since 1933 astronomers have postulated a new form of
matter -- dark matter -- to account for the gravitational potential
holding these galaxies together. Proof for the existence of dark matter
has recently been obtained by Marusa Bradac, Ph.D., of the Kavli
Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (KIPAC) at Stanford
and her collaborators around the world.
The Hunt for Invisible Matter
Dark matter has been notoriously hard to detect; it doesn't emit or
reflect radiation such as light or heat, and only interacts
gravitationally with itself and normal matter. The composition of dark
matter is also unknown. However, Bradac notes that we can study certain
properties of dark matter. "We know [dark matter] doesn't scatter off
each other and only interacts through gravity," says Bradac. "We also
know how it forms structures, so when we run simulations with dark
matter particles, it has to map out the galaxies the same way we
observe them." These detailed maps of the galaxies are used to measure
the mass distribution of dark matter inside them.
Just how much dark matter is there in the universe? The general
consensus among astronomers is that 25% of the universe is composed of
dark matter. "Whereas dark matter is all around us, it's a lot more
smoothly distributed. Its density is not large enough on Earth for us
to feel its gravity," says Bradac. "The concentration of regular
matter, like the earth, is very high; that's why we experience its
gravity directly."
Tracing Shadows in the Sky
Dark matter was finally caught in action through observations of a rare
collision of two galaxy clusters three billion light years away. Bradac
and her team were able to detect the dark matter through a phenomenon
called gravitational lensing. "Gravitational lensing works in a similar
way to how a regular magnifying glass works," Bradac explains. "When
you have a background source emitting light and then you put a
magnifying glass in between [the observer and the source].... you get a
different, enlarged image. Except in this case it's not [made of] a
glass type-material, but a big lump of dark and luminous matter. Due to
its gravity, light will bend. That's why we see distortions and
multiple images of the same background source." These characteristic
increases in brightness from background galaxies allowed the team to
map out the mass in the colliding clusters.
Using the Hubble Space Telescope, the Magellan Telescopes and the Very
Large Telescope located in Chile, as well as NASA's Chandra X-ray
Observatory, the team discovered that as theory predicted, there were
two isolated regions of dark matter passing through the collision
unaffected, and two smaller clumps of hot gas lagging behind. Bradac
explains that in the clusters, "There are a couple thousand galaxies
that are so far apart that they don't see each other, so the chance
that two galaxies collide is very small. They basically just go through
in such a collision. However, gas behaves like a fluid, so the gas did
interact and we got ram pressure stripping."
Ram pressure stripping allowed the separation of dark matter on either
side of the collision from the gas in the middle. Bradac describes this
effect: "Imagine two gas clouds smashed together; they would heat up
and create turbulence. That's why [the gas] slows down and stays in
between." Previous observations of individual clusters with gas and
dark matter yielded measurements of their combined effects, which made
it difficult to say how much mass belonged to each component --
gravitational lensing only allows for determination of the total mass.
But now that the gas and dark matter were separated, Bradac and her
team could clearly see the mass that belonged to dark matter and to
gas. These breakthroughs will be published in upcoming issues of the
Astrophysical Journal and the Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Alternate Realities
Some scientists, however, believe that there is no dark matter, and
that we need to modify our theories on gravity instead. "For this
system in particular," Bradac says, "there was no way to modify the
laws of gravity in order to explain the observations, although people
are now trying hard to come up with alternative explanations. They
might come up with modified theories [to] explain the system without
dark matter. That's why it's important to continue finding new systems."
Beyond the Stars
Measuring the dark matter distribution in as many different systems as
possible -- from clusters to individual galaxies -- and then comparing
these measurements with simulations will help piece together the
cosmological model: how the universe started and where it is going.
Multiple systems are required for elucidating the behavior of dark
matter and its profile. "We just got new data for the same cluster. Now
we are trying to study the properties of dark matter in a bit more
detail," Bradac says.
"Because these clusters act as lenses, they're magnifying the
background sources. You can study sources further away than you would
normally." In a sense, these massive clusters act as "gravitational
telescopes." Researchers are hoping to use these clusters to see one of
the first galaxies formed.
The Search Continues
Perhaps one of the most intriguing questions yet to be answered is:
What is dark matter made of? Particle astrophysicists may soon be able
to directly detect dark matter using the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at
CERN, the world's largest particle physics laboratory. "We don't know
what the mass of dark matter is," states Bradac. "There are many
different models, and depending on which is right, we might or might
not detect it in 2007 [using the LHC, a particle accelerator]. It might
be out of the mass range of detector sensitivity."
When asked about the arcane nature of her work, Bradac responded, "I
had undergraduates working for me during the summer, and they were
doing exactly the same type of research I was doing. Because it is such
a collaborative effort, if students are interested they can join. It
was so many different clues and sources of data that came together in
order to create this story."
Factboxes:
Box #1: Most of the universe is dark. Only about 5% of it is ordinary
matter that can be "seen"; the rest is 25% dark matter and 70% dark
energy. Cosmologists have postulated the existence of dark energy -- a
form of energy that exerts negative pressure -- to explain the
expansion of the universe at an accelerating rate. However, even less
is known of dark energy than of dark matter, which leads to the
conclusion that we are still in the dark on 95% of the universe!
Box #2: The most likely candidate for dark matter is the hypothetical
Weakly Interacting Massive Particle (WIMP). WIMPS are thought to be
smaller than atoms and only interact with matter gravitationally. Other
substances termed MAssive Compact Halo Objects (MACHOs) have also been
considered to comprise dark matter. MACHOs include brown dwarfs, an
intermediate between stars and planets, that are not luminous enough to
be directly detected by telescopes. However, Bradac says, "If indeed
dark matter is in the form of [MACHOs], it would cause an observable
effect on the so-called micro-lensing event. When we look at stars in
neighboring galaxies, we would have to see the occasional amplification
due to these lumps of material, but not enough of these signatures have
been seen in order to explain dark matter as being completely made of
this normal matter." |
|