Culture Played Role in Success of Software

By JAMES J. MITCHELL

Mercury News Business Editor

WE Americans often think we are burdened by two internal disadvantages when we combat international competitors: our government, which seems to hurt business more than it helps; and our culture, which encourages individualism and often gets in the way of teamwork.

 

Just the reverse is true when it comes to software. The government helped create the environment that has enabled our software industry to become the world leader. And our culture has played an important role in helping our software industry prosper.

 

That's good news to Silicon Valley and the U.S. economy because software, whether on floppy disks or embedded in hardware, is playing an increasingly important role in products ranging from semiconductors to computers to portable telephones.

''The industrial world is knowledge-based, and software is the amplifier of such knowledge,'' says Edward Feigenbaum, head of Stanford's Software Industry Research Project.

 

THE government began helping the industry in the mid-1960s, when it began investing in basic software research. Then in 1968, the Justice Department forced IBM, which dominated the computer business, to price its hardware and software separately. This ''unbundling'' enabled competitors to vie for software contracts.

 

Finally, the government has worked closely with software publishers to minimize piracy. That's not the case in Japan, where businesses frequently make five copies of each program they buy and the government makes 10. It's impossible to have a strong domestic software industry with that rate of piracy.

 

U.S. cultural attitudes have also helped the industry. Americans view software as real products and are proud to be software engineers. In Japan, software is considered an intangible; programming is a second-class job; and most people don't want to invest their careers, or money, in the business.

 

Even though IBM is by far the largest software company, much of our software success has come from entrepreneurs. They've succeeded in part because individualism is highly desired and respected here. Failure is allowable and, in some cases, considered a prerequisite for success. That's not true in Japan and Europe.

 

In the United States, young entrepreneurs are folk heroes, people to be emulated. And in software, it's often the young who are at the cutting edge of technology, and they're given tremendous responsibility right out of school. That's rarely true elsewhere.

 

So far, the U.S. software industry has even benefited from our tendency to want to do things quickly rather than perfectly. Customers want improved functionality and low prices more than software without bugs.

 

That's no longer the case for some types of software, and eventually quality may become the driving factor. But that's likely to be far in the future. And if existing companies don't adjust, you can bet that a new set of entrepreneurs will.

 

Write James J. Mitchell at the Mercury News, 750 Ridder Park Drive, San Jose, CA 95190; phone (408) 920-5544; fax (408) 920-5917 or send e-mail to JMitch on Mercury Center or JMitch@aol.com on Internet.

 

MERCURY CENTER ID: me43774m

 

Transmitted: 94-09-27 09:17:41 EDT

 


Back Home