1996 Project Reports | Home | Contents | Previous | Next |


Influence of Collar Geometry in femoral components

Jay A. Mandell, MS; Gary S. Beaupré, PhD; Stuart B. Goodman, MD, Ph.D; David J. Schurman, MD; Dennis R. Carter, PhD


Joint degeneration due to arthritis or trauma adversely affects the quality of life of many older Americans. Over 250,000 patients are treated yearly with artificial joint replacements. While these operations have been very successful in restoring pain-free function, complications can occur, including prosthesis loosening, infection, inflammation, and bone or prosthesis fracture. The design of the components for joint replacement surgery can greatly influence the eventual success or failure of the procedure. At the Rehab R&D Center, we apply our engineering expertise to investigate how various aspects of component designs can be improved.

Many current joint replacement components are implanted without the use of bone cement. Porous surface treatments allow bone tissue to grow into the prostheses in order to provide stable long-term fixation. One area of concern for these joint replacements is relative motion (micromotion) between the prosthesis and the bone in the immediate post-operative period. If too much micromotion is produced when the patient uses the joint, the bone will not grow into the prosthesis. Instead of stable fixation, a fibrous (scar-like) tissue may develop which can lead to pain and eventual failure of the procedure. A second area of concern is long-term bone adaptation around the prostheses. When a natural joint is replaced with artificial components, the way the remaining bone supports the loads generated during daily activities is changed. Bone hypertrophies with increased loading and atrophies under decreased loading. Joint replacements generally result in reduced loading of the bone adjacent to the joint. This can lead to excessive loss of bony support for the prosthesis and subsequent prosthesis loosening (Fig. 1).

X-rays

Figure 1. X-rays of a femoral prosthesis. Compare the bone a) immediately after surgery and b) after the prosthesis has induced bone loss.

Among the techniques we use to study joint replacements is computer simulation of bones and artificial components. The most common joint replacement surgery is total hip replacement, which involves both sides of the ball and socket joint at the hip. In a recent study, we used computer modeling to investigate effect of collar geometry on micromotion and bone loss in the components implanted in the femur (thigh bone).

We compared micromotion and load transfer among four prostheses: flat collared, 30 degree and 60 degree conical-collared, and tapered (Fig. 2). According to our definition of collar angle, the flat collar and taper are equivalent to 0 degree and 80 degree conical collars, respectively. To isolate the effects of collar geometry, the implant models were straight-stemmed and cylindrical, and collar angle was the only design variable. Our goal was to quantify the relationship between collar angle, micromotion, and the details of load transfer in the early post-operative period.

Figure

Figure 2. Computer models of femoral component collar geometries.

The flat (0 degree) collar used direct axial compression to transfer loads from the joint to the adjacent bone. In contrast, the 30 degree, 60 degree, and 80 degree collars transferred loads by "wedging" into the bone. Micromotion was lowest in the flat collar model, due to the flat support provided by the bone, and increased with collar angle, as increased wedging was accompanied by increased sinking into the bone.

To predict changes in bone density around the component, we applied a mathematical theory for bone adaptation developed by our research group. In simulating the early post-operative period, we considered a fully loose (unbonded) prosthesis with no bone ingrowth (Fig. 3). We found that the most extensive bone loss was predicted for the flat-collared model, and that bone loss could be expected to decrease with increasing collar angle. Virtually no bone loss was anticipated in the 60 degree and 80 degree models.

Figure

Figure 3. Results of the bone adaptation simulation in the bone surrounding the implant. The initial bone density was assumed to be 1.70 g/cc.

The results suggest that femoral loading can be maintained with conical-collared or tapered prostheses, but that increased loading is accompanied by increased micromotion, which may prevent stable long-term bony fixation. Recent work includes efforts to predict long-term bone adaptation around these prostheses in the presence of bony ingrowth, and to determine the effect of the extent of porous coating on bone maintenance.


Republished from the 1996 Rehabilitation R&D Center Progress Report. For current information about this project, contact: Jay A. Mandell

Button Bar

People Projects Publications Resources Home