| as National Security Advisor | as Stanford Provost | as Chevron Board Member |
PLEASE NOTE: Members of the extended Stanford community, including alumni, who have not had the opportunity to sign the petition in person are encouraged to email their "signature" to jzide@stanford.edu. Please include your name, year, and Stanford affiliation.
Downloadable Petition (PDF format ) -- Quite comprehensive, lists key points of why so very many students and community members are upset at the choice of Condi as Stanford commencement speaker, and lists many good references for further exploration of the issues.
Downloadable Petition in HTML format (best seen in I. Explorer)
Other Relevant Articles:
Excellent Letter to Editor of Stanford Daily from Graduating Seniors; from Feb 13, 2002
Additional Letter to the Ed. from Stanford Resident R. Marshall, May 6, 2002
--- Other Members of Commencement Organizing Effort:
- C Dahlke
- F Fleischman
- I Monroe
- I Slattery
- S Fels
- A Baker
- I Slattery
- M Vander Sluis
- B Blanchard
- N Robertson
Did Condi Rice fail to act on pre-September 11th intelligence, despite ample evidence that the CIA, the FBI, and the Bush Administration had prior warning? This burden falls especially heavily on Dr. Rice's shoulders, since one of the primary roles of the National Security Advisor is to relay information concerning domestic and international terrorist threats to the White House (Time). On May 16th 2002, Dr. Rice lied to defend the White House by stating "I don't think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center, take another and slam it into the Pentagon; that they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked plane as a missile. All this reporting about hijacking was about traditional hijacking." Considering the widely publicized terrorist attempts to fly planes into the Eiffel Tower (1994) and CIA headquarters (1995), and a 1999 CIA report detailing the possibility of al-Qaeda operatives hijacking and flying planes into strategic targets, Dr. Rice's statement is patently false:
uk guardian: http://www.observer.co.uk/waronterrorism/story/0,1373,718264,00.html
new york times: Pre-Attack Memo Cited Bin Laden. May 15, 2002; A1
ap: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20020524/D7JMQ9J82.html
media monitors: http://www.mediamonitors.net/mosaddeq36.html
msnbc: http://www.msnbc.com/news/635213.asp "The lesson of Air France Flight 8969"