~"Success and Challenge: News from the Community Writing (...and Speaking and Multimedia) Program" by Carolyn Ross

~ "PWR + Oral Communication Program = An Exercise in Collaboration" by Jennifer Hennings

~ "Welcome Aboard!" by Stacey Stanfield Anderson

~ "Thoughts on the Writing Center and SWC Workshop" by Nancy Buffington

~ "A New Look for the SWC Director" An Interview with Clyde Moneyhun by Alyssa O'Brien

~ "Bator's Take on Tufte" by Paul Bator

~ In the Spotlight: CBB Prepares for CCCC Bash - Interview with Marvin Diogenes by Alyssa O'Brien

~ "Big Fun at the Edward Albee Theatre Conference" by Kevin DiPirro

~ "Tid-Bits from a Tightwad" by Melissa Marconi

~ "What's Your Rhetorical Stance?" by Stacey Stanfield Anderson

~ "PMLA Alternative Source Citation" (outside link -- thanks Clyde!)

~ "Family Business" by Stacey Stanfield Anderson
Volume III | Number 2 | Winter 2005

I have to say, despite the flurry of preparing for this course and the feeling that I’m flying by the seat of my pants (not to mention my fears of a technology meltdown or a meltdown of nerves), the first three weeks have been exhilarating. Thus far, the technology in the Meyer classroom has been stellar and the student’s participation and work has been equally stellar. My own efforts have been effective, I think, given the results of the first two assignments.


For more information about Rebecca's course, look at

The theme of my PWR 2 course, “Spectacular Rhetoric: Electric Billboards, Corporate Identity, Corporate Persuasion,” requires that students unwrap as well as reproduce their own version of the often tongue-in-cheek transparent and sometimes subtle rhetoric in contemporary advertising, particularly, as seen in the latest trend in billboards, the Spectacular. After doing some reading and viewing a film examining the rhetorical strategies of marketing campaigns in general, I assigned my students a rhetorical analysis essay of a static billboard (e.g., without any moving images or flashing lights) as a way of “breaking the ice” with what is for many of them “uncharted territory” (e.g., they see the ads, but they don’t give them much thought). The essays were then presented as 5 minute oral presentations with minimal visual aid (one static image of the billboard either as a projection on the big screen, as a poster, or as a handout).


As I said, my purpose with this two part assignment was to introduce students to the theme (Spectacular Rhetoric) and goals (refining their skills in the rhetoric of writing and oration) of the course. In addition, the essay was to pick up where they left off in PWR 1 – I told my students they had to write this essay as well as they wrote their final essay in PWR 1. I am very pleased with the results of both assignments. The students wrote strong essays reflecting the success of their PWR 1 courses, and they incorporated much of the language introduced to them in the readings I assigned in the first week of class. The oral presentations were courageous, especially since the majority of my students have never given one before and they had less than a week to prepare.

I feel more confident in my ability to teach PWR 2, but I’m still faced with the most difficult challenge for this course and its theme, the final project, which will incorporate the students’ new understanding of the rhetoric of advertising into a reproduction of it in their own multi-modal presentations. How this final project will play out remains a mystery as well as my most challenging task. Yet, the success of the past three weeks has left me feeling more excited than anxious about persevering through these challenges. I look forward to the work my students are going to produce as well as the journey on which this course will take us.