“Successful
intercultural communication is a matter of highest importance
if humankind and society are to survive.”
-- Larry Samovar, Richard Porter, & Edwin McDaniel,
Intercultural Communication
|
It’s
a new quarter, and Stanford students in the PWR 2 class, “Cross-Cultural
Rhetoric” are getting to know one another. But in this
class, their peers are not only those sharing a Wallenberg classroom.
Instead, their peers and colleagues for the next ten weeks are
students located 5,300 miles away, across a time difference of
nine hours, in the small town of Örebro, Sweden. For their
first shared class together, students were placed into globally-distributed
teams, with plasma screens as portals to the world.
 |
| After
Natalie showed her Swedish peers this pink Ikea pet named
“Velcro,” they named their team after the animal
they could only meet through webcam technology. |
We asked them
to share rhetorical artifacts illuminating their cultural identity
– such as the small pink stuffed animal from Ikea called
“Velcro” that Stanford student Natalie Knutsen holds
up to the webcam to show her peers in Örebro. Then we gave
them the following challenge: develop one collaborative group
identity for yourselves as a cross-cultural team and come
up with a name that you will use for the rest of the quarter.
Our pedagogical goal was to contribute new learning to the field
of intercultural theory and pedagogy by asking students to form
and work in globally-distributed teams. We hoped
to eradicate the boundaries that separated these students even
as they learned to develop intercultural competencies and a diverse
world view. No “us versus them” mentality desired
here.
The teams
impressed us with their creativity and word-smithing. One group
based itself on the Swedish Ikea animal owned by an American student
and named itself “Velcro”; another took a name to
indicate American ignorance about Sweden by naming itself after
the famous Swedish astronaut “Fugelsang,” while a
third composed a hybrid title to indicate a shared love of music,
calling itself “Muzikahölics.” A fourth group
created a collaborative identity based on person’s embodied
rhetoric, a green hat, and so they became known as the “Green
Hat” Group. They wore their real or simulated hats to every
subsequent session.
 |
 |
| Students
collaborating in globally-distributed teams in Stanford and
Örebro develop a shared cross-cultural identity as “The
Green Hat Group.” |
Wallenberg
Funded Innovations in Teaching with Technology
This is the second quarter of the Cross-Cultural Rhetoric Project,
a grant funded initiative made possible by the Wallenberg
Global Learning Network (WGLN). The project builds on a solid
theoretical foundation of scholarship in intercultural communication,
rhetoric, and pedagogy and technology to offer students the rare
and valuable opportunity for active learning of cross-cultural
writing, research, rhetorical analysis, and presentation skills.
Read more about the theoretical foundation
With the New Year came new experiments in using technology to
connect students across the globe. This time, Alyssa O’Brien
and Christine Alfano co-taught the PWR 2 course in “Cross-Cultural
Rhetoric,” and the project benefited tremendously from Christine’s
expertise in technology and web design, as students in the Winter
could consult the course website to learn the cross-cultural activities
planned for the quarter (http://www.stanford.edu/group/ccr/w07/),
and they learned to write on both blogs and a class wiki.
(continued...)
|