Target Audience (race, age, risk group, etc.):
CPSP clients
Intervention Strategy Description:
Chart audit to identify rates of test offering, counseling and acceptance, as well as documentation quality amongst CPSP clients.
Intervention Strategy Justification (why this the most useful and effective method):
Will give an accurate picture of how well providers
are complying with State law to document offering and to provide counseling,
and a test offer in PNC.
Monitoring
Overview of Monitoring Plan:
Data variables collected:
Demographics, documentation of test offering, counseling and acceptance. No identifying information or HIV test results will be recorded.
Frequency of data collection:
Ongoing
Person(s) responsible for data reporting:
County Coordinator will work in conjunction with Stanford, and will forward .
Data management plan:
Record abstraction forms will be completed for each patient, and forwarded monthly to Stanford for data entry.
Data reporting plan:
Stanford will summarize record review data quarterly.
Intervention Plan B - Date: 8/2/01 County: SAC
Overall Description
Target Audience (race, age, risk group, etc.): Women of Color
Intervention Strategy Description:
Collaborate with case managers from other MCH and HIV/ AIDS programs to reinforce universal VCT message.
Intervention Strategy Justification (why this the most useful and effective method):
Programs already exist that are accessing at-risk and hard-to-reach pregnant women. This will optimize County resources and minimize duplication of efforts.
Implementation
Community Partners: POE, BIH and PCG programs, Mobile testing units, CARES (EIP), Knight
Contact at Community Agency: Julie (HIV/ AIDS prevention)
Community Agency Resources Used (personnel, printed materials, space): Personnel
County Resources given to Community Agency: Referral cards and printed materials (brochures), technical assistance.
County liaison with Agency:
Monitoring
Overview of Monitoring Plan:
County Coordinator will monitor the women that these programs refer to counseling by auditing forms for "referred to perinatal" check box.
Data variables collected:
Demographics, documentation of referral to PNC and VCT. Follow-up to monitor infected women through pregnancy and outcome of child.
Frequency of data collection:
Ongoing data collected as pregnant women are seen by case-managers at local programs. County coordinator will liaise with case managers on a weekly/ bi-weekly basis.
Person(s) responsible for data reporting:
County Coordinator , in conjunction with case managers
Data management plan:
County Coordinator will monitor number of referrals
to VCT and those clients' demographic in a spreadsheet, will forward
to Stanford monthly.
Intervention
Plan C Date: 8/2/01 County: SAC
Overall Description
Target Audience (race, age, risk group, etc.): Providers
Intervention Strategy Description:
Conduct roundtable discussions with 45 OB/ GYNs , perinatal care providers and/ or Geographic Care Plan administrators to determine best ways to implement universal counseling and testing in their practices. Based on this input, design lunch and learn in-service sessions for providers in high-risk zip codes.
Intervention Strategy Justification (why this the most useful and effective
method):
Providers and clients have discordant rates of reported
counseling and testing. Need to remind providers about the importance
of VCT and the State law. Providers will give input prior to development
of training,
Implementation
Community Partners: Local providers and experts
Contact at Community Agency: numerous
Community Agency Resources Used (personnel, printed materials, space): personnel, meeting space, leaders' time and opinions
County Resources given to Community Agency: Coordination and technical assistance, refreshments/ food, training materials, brochures.
County liaison with Agency:
Monitoring & Evaluation
Overview of Monitoring Plan:
County Coordinator will transcribe Roundtable session(s) and incorporate feedback into the design of Lunch and Learn curricula.
Data variables collected:
Demographics, attitudes about VCT and the State law, client demographics. Roundtable discussion(s) and lunch and learn sessions will be evaluated afterwards for effectiveness, etc.
Frequency of data collection:
Data collected at every training session or meeting
Person(s) responsible for data reporting:
County Coordinator
Data management plan:
County coordinator will copy and forward data forms to Stanford to enter into database within a week of a roundtable/ training session.
Data reporting plan:
Stanford will summarize data quarterly and send to County