Implementation
Intervention Strategy Description:
Summarize needs assessment findings in an article
(with graph or table) for publication in Alliance newsletter. Include
follow-up contact information.
Intervention Strategy Justification (why this
the most useful and effective method):
Reaches wide audience of relevant providers, provides
data evidence of County stats, requires minimal time, inexpensive.
Monitoring
Overview of Monitoring Plan:
Will keep copy of printed article and monitor requests
for information.
Data variables collected:
- # of newsletters distributed (with breakdown of demographics
if possible: clinician degree, zip code of practice, etc.)
Frequency of data collection:
Ongoing once article printed
Person(s) responsible for data reporting:
Data management plan:
County Coordinator will tabulate info requests and
demographics in an Excel spreadsheet (or similar) and send to Stanford
on a regular basis (monthly, quarterly)
Data reporting plan:
County Coordinator and Stanford will summarize results
on a quarterly basis.
Intervention
Plan B - Date: 7/9/01 County: AL
Overall Description
Target Audience (race, age, risk group, etc.): Clients
at busy PNC clinics (all races, predominantly)
Intervention Strategy Description:
Improve quality and quantity of counseling (and therefore
testing) by showing a video to PNC clients and providing a self-administered
KAP questionnaire that can be used as a discussion guide for targeted
counseling. Train para-medical personnel to go over instrument with
client and refer her to relevant literature, brochures, etc.
Intervention Strategy Justification (why this the
most useful and effective method):
Counseling rates reported to be <50% of women--need
to improve quality and cut down counseling time for clinicians.
Implementation
Community Partners: Highland Hospital PNC clinic
Contact at Community Agency:
Community Agency Resources Used (personnel, printed
materials, space): Space, PNC staff
County Resources given to Community Agency: Training,
KAP instrument, printed materials (brochures, referral cards, etc.)
Monitoring
Overview of Monitoring Plan:
Will monitor acceptability of video and self-administered
KAP survey amongst clients and staff; Will monitor improvement in
HIV-related knowledge and rates of counseling and testing by comparing
pilot group with a similar group at another clinic or at the same
clinic but amongst those not receiving intervention. Will monitor
quantity of brochures, etc. dispensed.
Data variables collected:
Demographics (race, age, educ, marital status, insur,
zip) risk behavior knowledge about HIV/ perinatal transmission and
SB 889, attitudes about mandatory vs. voluntary testing.
Frequency of data collection:
Data collected for every client within pilot period.
Forms forwarded to County and then Stanford for data entry every 2
weeks. Bi-weekly monitoring by county coordinator/ hospital liaison
of # of clients seen, #referrals, #brochures, etc.
Person(s) responsible for data
reporting:
Hospital liaison, County Coordinator
Intervention
Plan C* - Date: 7/9/01 County: AL
Overall Description
Target Audience (race, age, risk group, etc.): Clients
Intervention Strategy Description:
Develop CASI module to counsel and inform women about
HIV and risks and benefits of testing. Have program generate and print
a simple KAP survey AND/ OR a consent to be tested at the end.
Intervention Strategy Justification (why this
the most useful and effective method):
Could reach a large number of clients in a culturally-sensitive
and private manner. Will require minimal provider.
Implementation
Community Partners: Computer programmer
.and will
need to be piloted at a clinic such as Highland hospital or a site
where population more computer savvy.
Contact at Community Agency:
Community Agency Resources Used (personnel, printed
materials, space): Space, liaison with county coordinator
County Resources given to Community Agency: Technical
information, consultation, laptop/terminal and software
County liaison with Agency:
Monitoring
Overview of Monitoring Plan:
Will investigate feasibility, cost-effectiveness
and acceptability of program. Will measure knowledge and rates of
counseling and testing of CASI clients compared to non-CASI clients
at same facility, or similar clients at another facility.
Data variables collected:
#Women using program, Technical success of program,
increase in VCT, KAP and demographic information from clients. Acceptability
amongst providers.
Frequency of data collection: Every client completes
computer-generated survey within pilot period, surveys forwarded from
hospital liaison on weekly basis and sent to Stanford every 2 weeks.
Bi-weekly monitoring by county coordinator/ hospital liaison of #
of clients seen, #referrals, #brochures, etc.
Person(s) responsible for data
reporting:
Hospital liaison and County coordinator
Data management plan:
Forms copied at the County and forwarded to Stanford
every 2 weeks, entered in Statistical database.
Data reporting plan:
Stanford will summarize stats every 2 months and
send to County