Mea Culpa, O Felix Culpa
The Gravity of Sin and the Glory of Grace
Week of Monday, February 24, 2003
I was a struggling teenager and a poor student in high school, but
I still remember my Latin teacher, Mrs. Haddock. That's different than
saying I remember any Latin, which I don't. After doing poorly in her
class, I tried my hand at French and then Spanish, and, of course,
achieved similar mediocre results. Many years later as a Christian, I
learned that for Protestants and Catholics, Latin is the language of our
Christian scholarly heritage. Tertullian (c. 160–215) was the first major
theologian to write in Latin as opposed to Greek, and at least among
Catholics many readers can still remember hearing the mass in Latin.
There are some very powerful truths about following Jesus that
have come down to us in succinct Latin phrases, and this week I want to
introduce two of them to think about our lives as lived in sin and
grace. Brennan Manning tells the story of attending the fiftieth year
reunion of his graduating class of Xaverian High School in Brooklyn, when
late one evening one of his classmates asked him to recap his life since
high school. Manning responded, “well, it's been a half century of sin
and grace.” Manning's comment hints at something important about
following Jesus.
The first Latin phrase is so common that it has long since passed
into our secular vernacular and for most people has no religious meaning
at all: mea culpa. “It's my fault,” or “sorry about that.” But if you
get a Catholic or Episcopal prayer book and turn to the right page you
will read words something like this: mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima
culpa.
This is our Christian confession of sin, “my fault, my own fault,
my own most grievous fault.” Part of following Jesus is owning up to our
own sin and recognizing its gravity. We cannot blame others, say the
devil made me do it, appeal to our genetic inheritance, reproach our
social milieu, or indict our toxic parents who ruined us. True, all these
factors helped to shape and form us into the people we are today; it
would be wrong to deny their importance. But when we confess our sins, we
say from the heart, “Father, this is my fault, my own fault, my own most
grievous fault, and no one else's; it is horrible.”
If you want a Biblical model for this type of confession recall
the Prodigal Son: “Father, I have sinned...I am no longer worthy to be
called your son” (Luke 15:21). Jesus told the parable of the Pharisee and
the tax collector (Luke 18:9–14) to people who “were confident of their
own righteousness and looked down on everyone else.” Luke's language is
powerful. The Pharisee “stood up and prayed about himself,” thanking God
that he was not like others. The sinful tax collector “stood at a
distance.” He could not even bear to raise his head but could only manage
to cry out, “God, have mercy on me a sinner.” After betraying Jesus three
times Peter “wept bitterly” (Luke 22:62). And Paul, you will remember,
counted himself the “worst” of all sinners (1 Timothy 1:16).
Some believers do not linger long enough here; they confess polite
sins that are not so bad, sins that really do not require radical grace to
forgive. Lurking in the background here is our constant temptation to
defend ourselves. But others linger far too long and wallow in a sort of
false or unhealthy guilt. Manning aptly describes this as a “terrorist
spirituality.” Unhealthy guilt is abusive, harsh, depressive, despairing,
and unremittingly accusatory.
So how do you know when you have confessed your sins adequately or
fully? This brings us to the second Latin phrase that has helped me to
crystallize an idea I have been thinking about for some time. Thomas
Aquinas (1224–1274) gave us the startling
phrase “O felix culpa!” in
reference to the fall of Adam. “O fortunate crime!” The fall of Adam as
a blessing? What did Aquinas mean in saying that Adam's sin was a good
thing?1 I think he meant that our sinfulness, however radical and ugly,
is the occasion for something even greater, God's rich love and mercy.
Paul suggests this very idea in Romans 5:20 when he writes that “where sin
increased, grace increased all the more.” God uses our sin and even satan
himself for his purposes of goodness, so that St. Augustine writes, “God
judged it better to bring good out of evil, than to allow no evil to
exist.”2
Some time ago I was startled to read in Frederick Buechner the
suggestion that “sin itself can be a means of grace.”3 This made me
think of Aquinas's phrase above. Later still, I came across this same
thought three more times. Julian of Norwich (1342–1414), an English
mystic who lived her life in total solitude, once wrote that “sin will be
no shame but an honor.” Similarly, Anthony deMello writes that
“repentance reaches fullness when you are brought to gratitude for your
sins.” Then Augustine once again, who wrote, “even from my sins God has
drawn good.”4
I think it goes without saying that if you have not paused fully
enough at the first Latin phrase to acknowledge without hedging the
magnitude of your own sin, and that the fault is all your own, then the
second Latin phrase about our sin as a sort of good fortune can be a huge
excuse or the worst form of rationalization. But having confessed our
sins fully and freely, we should be careful not to wallow in false guilt.
I think Julian of Norwich was correct when she wrote, “Our courteous Lord
does not want his servants to despair because they fall often and
grievously; for our falling does not hinder him in loving us.”5
In Jesus God has freely bestowed His grace upon us and made us
“accepted in His beloved” (Ephesians 1:6, KJV). Have you fully accepted
His acceptance? Have you come to “know and rely upon the love God has
for us” (1 John 4:16, NIV)? Manning offers an interesting test.
Imagine that Jesus ate dinner with you tonight. In sitting at
your table Jesus had full knowledge of “everything you are and are not,
your whole life story, with the hidden agenda and the dark desires unknown
even to yourself, every skeleton in your closet, all your mixed motives
and dark desires buried in your psyche.”6 Does such a prospective dinner
fill you with dread or joy? I think Manning is correct that at such a
dinner, and despite Jesus's intimate knowledge of all we are and are not,
“it would still be impossible to be saddened in His presence...You would
feel His acceptance and forgiveness.” Of course, this is precisely what
we read in the Gospels about Jesus attracting the worst sinners of society
to Himself at dinner parties, much to the chagrin of the religiously
righteous.
Here is how Manning answered this test when he responded to his
former classmate at the high school reunion: “Yes, I've been a drunk and
I've been divorced. I've been sexually promiscuous, faithful during my
marriage but unfaithful to celibacy, a liar, envious of the gifts of
others, a priest who was insufferably arrogant, a people pleaser and a
braggart...[But] by sheer undeserved grace, I've been able to abandon
myself in unshaken trust to the compassion and mercy of Jesus Christ.”7 Manning makes his mea culpa,
without qualification or obfuscation, but he
does not stop there. Rather, he presses on to the o felix culpa. He
understands the gravity of his sin; but he also understands the greater
power and glory of God's grace in Jesus Christ.
-
The full sentence in Aquinas reads, “O fortunate crime which merited
such and so great a redeemer.”
-
Augustine, Enchiridion, xxvii.
-
Frederick Buechner, The Sacred Journey (San Francisco: Harper and Row,
1982), p. 3.
-
See Brennan Manning, The Wisdom of Tenderness (San Francisco: Harper and
Row, 2002), pp. 145, 147, and 33, for the quotes by Julian of Norwich,
deMello, and Augustine.
-
Manning, ibid., p. 147.
-
Manning uses this story several times. See The Ragamuffin Gospel
(Sisters, Oregon: Multnomah, 2000), p. 67; and A Glimpse of Jesus, The
Stranger to Self-Hatred (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 2003), p. 33.
-
Manning, A Glimpse of Jesus, p. 24.
The Journey with Jesus: Notes to Myself
Copyright ©2003 by Dan Clendenin. All Rights Reserved.
|