1. GNOME Documentation Style Guide.

2. Interdisciplinary Studies Courses Descriptions. 1999, The Institute for European Studies, University of British Columbia.

3. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies: Contents 1989-2001. 2001.

4. Allen, J., Thematic Repetition as Rhetorical Technique. J. Technical Writing and Communication, 1991. 21(1): p. 29-40.

5. Allington, R.L., What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs. 2001, San Francisco: Longman. 166.

6. Anderson, R.C. and P. Freebody, Vocabulary knowledge, in Comprehension and teaching, J.T. Guthrie, Editor. 1981, International Reading Association: Newark, DE. p. 77-117.

7. Austin, A.E., Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career. 2001, Michigan State University. p. 1-38.

8. Ayres, J. and T. Hopf, Coping with writing apprehension. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 1991. August: p. 186-196.
9. Beck, C.E., Implications of metaphors in defining technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 1991. 21(1): p. 3-15.

10. Beghtol, C. Within, Among, Between: Three faces of Interdisciplinarity (extended abstract). in Annual conference of the Canadian Association for Information Sciences (CAIS). 1995. School of Library and Information Studies (LIS).

11. Blyler, N.R., Reading Theory and Persuasive Business Communications: Guidelines for Writers. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 1991. 21(4): p. 383-396.

12. Borden, C.M., Collaboration, For Better or For Worse. Part 4. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1992. 14(1): p. 133-142.
13. Borden, C.M., et al., Edited Excerpts from a Smithsonian Seminar Series. Part 3: The Humanities and Social Sciences. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1991. 14(1): p. 133-142.

14. Buck, J.A., E.B. Dent, and S.A. Umpleby, Commentary: Communicating science. Science Communication, 2000. 22(1): p. 73-87.

15. Caruso, D. and D. Rhoten, Lead, Follow, Get Out of the Way: Sidestepping the Barriers to Effective Practice of Interdisciplinarity... A New Mechanism For Knowledge Production and Re-Integration in the Age of Information. 2001, The Hybrid Vigor Institute. p. 1-29.

16. Chall, J.S., Readability: An appraisal of research and application. Bureau of Educational Research Monographs, No. 34. 1958, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

17. Chall, J.S. and E. Dale, Readability revisited: The new Dale-Chall readability formula. 1995, Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books. 159.

18. Dale, E. and J. O'Rourke, The living word vocabulary. 1981, Chicago: World Book/Childcraft International.

19. Dearing, J.W., G. Meyer, and J. Kazmierczak, Portraying the New:Communication Between University Innovators and Potential Users. Science Communication, 1994. 16(1): p. 11-42.

20. Dorrell, J.T. and N.S. Darsey, An Analysis of the Readibility and Style of Letters to Stockholders. Science Communication, 1991. 21(1): p. 73-83.

21. Flesch, R., How to Write Plain English...Chapter 2: Let's Start With the Formula.

22. Fountas, I.C. and G.S. Pinnell, Leveled books for readers, Grades 3-6, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

23. Fountas, I.C. and G.S. Pinnell, Matching books to readers: Using leveled books in guided reading, K-3. 1999, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. 400.

24. Freebody, P. and R.C. Anderson, Effects of vocabulary difficulty, text cohesion, and schema availability on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 1983. 18(3): p. 277-294.

25. Friedman, M.A. and Z.E. Farag, Gaps in the dissemination/knowledge utilization base. Knowledge, 1991. 12(3): p. 266-288.

26. Fry, E., Reading formulas--Maligned but valid. Journal of Reading, 1989. 32: p. 292-297.

27. Gascoigne, T. and J. Metcalfe, Incentives and Impediments to Scientists Communicating through the Media. Science Communication, 1997. 18(3): p. 265-282.

28. Giordano, G., Twentieth-Century reading education: Understanding practices of today in terms of patterns of the past. Advances in reading/language research, ed. P.B. Mosenthal. 2000, Stamford, CT: JAI Press. 399.

29. Harris, R.A., A do-it yourself usability kit. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 1991. 21(4): p. 351-368.

30. Johnson, C.C.I., Report: World Wide Web Sites for the Dissemination of Science to the Public- A Classification into Three Types. Science Communication, 1996. 18(1): p. 80-87.

31. Johnson, K., Readability. 1998, http://www.timetabler.com.

32. Klare, G.R., Readability, in Handbook of reading research, P.D. Pearson, Editor. 1984, Longman: New York. p. 681-744.

33. Klare, G.R., The formative years, in Readability: Its past, present, and future, B.L. Zakaluk and S.J. Samuels, Editors. 1988, International Reading Association: Newark, DE. p. 14-34.

34. Kotecha, P., Problem Solving and Report Writing for Second Language Engineering Students. J. Technical Writing and Communication, 1991. 21(2): p. 165-173.

35. Kreps, G.L., L.R. Frey, and D. O'Hair, Applied communication research: Scholarship that can make a difference. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 1991. June: p. 71-87.

36. LaDuc, L., Infusing Practical Wisdom into Persuasive Performance:Hermeneutics and the Teaching of Sales Proposal Writing. J. Technical Writing and Communication, 1991. 21(2): p. 155-164.

37. LaFollette, M.C., Editorial: An Accelerated Rate of Change-- "Popularized" Science. Science Communication, 1997. 18(4): p. 291-296.

38. Landry, R., N. Amara, and M. Lamari, Climbing the Ladder of Research Utilization: Evidence from Social Science Research. Science Communication, 2001. 22(4): p. 396-422.

39. Lorge, I., Predicting readability. School and Society, 1948. 47: p. 404-419.

40. MacDonald, D.G.J., Editorial: Energy and Technology in the 21st Century. 1998, IIASA.

41. MacDonald, D.G.J., Editorial: Energy and Technology in the 21st Century. 1998.

42. March, J.C.-n.a., Chapter 1: The Role of Interdisciplinary Research, in Interdisciplinary Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education. 1987, National Academy Press: Washington, D.C. p. 1-12.
43. Mayer, R.E., What have we learned about increasing the meaningfullness of science prose? Science Education, 1983. 67(2): p. 223-237.

44. Mayer, R.E. and R.B. Anderson, The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1992. 84(4): p. 444-452.

45. Mayer, R.E., et al., When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1996. 88(1): p. 64-73.

46. Mayer, R.E. and V.K. Sims, For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extension of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1994. 86(3): p. 389-401.

47. McDonald, D., Commentary: Writing Brand Names. J. Technical Writing and Communication, 1991. 21(2): p. 127-131.

48. McLeod, D., Truth, Territory and the Coffee Break: experiences of multidisciplinary research in education and training. 2000, SOCINET, CSSE, University of Alberta. p. 1-23.

49. McLeod, D., Truth, Territory and the Coffee Break: experiences of mutidisciplinary research in education and training. 2000, University of British Columbia: Vancouver.

50. McNair, J.R., Ancient memory arts and modern graphics. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 1991. 21(3): p. 259-269.
51. McNair, J.R., Ancient Memory Arts and Modern Graphics. J. Technical Writing and Communication, 1991. 21(2): p. 259-269.

52. Meehan, S. and J.A. Valentine, Research Champions: Translating Research and Reinventing Government Health Care. Science Communication, 1994. 16(1): p. 90-101.

53. Nissani, M., Ten Cheers for Interdisciplinarity: The Case for Interdisciplinary Knowledge and Research. Social Science Journal, 1997. 34(2): p. 201-216.

54. Nyquist, J.D., et al., The Development of Graduate Students as Teaching Scholars: A Four-Year Longitudinal Study. 2001, University of Washington, Michigan State University, San Jose State University. p. 1-6.

55. Nyquist, J.D., et al., On the Road to Becoming a Professor: the Graduate Student Experience, in Change. 1999. p. 18-27.

56. Ragsdale, A.R.a.R.G., A Process Perspective on Participation in Scholarly Electronic Forums. Science Communication, 1997. 18(4): p. 320-341.

57. Reif, F. and J.H. Larkin, Cognition in scientific and everyday domains: Comparison and learning implications. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1991. 28(9): p. 733-760.

58. Rensberger, B., Report: Image and meaning conference. Science Communication, 2002. 23(2): p. 342-347.

59. Riley, K., Passive voice and rhetorical role in scientific writing. Journal of Writing and Communication, 1991. 21(3): p. 239-257.

60. Rodman, L., Anticipatory it in scientific discourse. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 1991. 21(1): p. 17-27.

61. Rogers, E.M., The Nature of Technology Transfer. Science Communication, 2002. 23(3): p. 323-341.

62. Rojo, A. and R.G. Ragsdale, A Process Perspective on Participation in Scholarly Electronic Forums. Science Communication, 1997. 18(4): p. 320-341.

63. Rowan, b.K.E., et al., Project Bibliography for the NCA/NSF Workshop on Communicating about Science: Improving Scientists' and Engineers' Communication Abilities, National Communication Association, National Science Foundation: Washington D.C. p. 1-26.

64. Rowan, K.E., Goals, obstacles, and strategies in risk communication: A problem-solving approach to improving communication about risks. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 1991. November: p. 300-329.

65. Rowan, K.E., When simple language fails: Presenting difficult science to the public. Journal of Writing and Communication, 1991. 21(4): p. 369-382.

66. Rukavina, I. and M. Daneman, Integration and its effect on acquiring knowledge about competing scientific theories from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1996. 88(2): p. 272-287.

67. Silverman, R.J., Contexts of Knowing: Their Shape and Substance. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1993. 14(4): p. 372-385.
68. Spyridakis, J.H., M.J. Wenger, and S.H. Andrew, The technical communicator's guide to understanding statistics and research design. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 1991. 21(3): p. 207-219.

69. Stafford, A. Using boundary-work theories in professional accounting development- explaining the creation and development of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. in Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Accounting Conference. 1997. University of Central England in Birmingham.

70. Steinke, J., Reaching readers. Science Communication, 1995. 16(4): p. 432-453.

71. Stephens, I.E., Citation Indexes Improve Bibliography in Technical Communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 1991. 21(2): p. 117-125.

72. Thompson, I., The Speech Community in Technical Communication. J. Technical Writing and Communication, 1991. 21(1): p. 41-54.

73. Thralls, C., Bridging Visual and Verbal Communication: Training Videos and Written Instructional Texts. J. Technical Writing and Communication, 1991. 21(3): p. 285-306.

74. Treise, D. and M.F. Weigold, Advancing Science Communication: A Survey of Science Communicators. Science Communication, 2002. 23(3): p. 310-322.

75. Trower, C.A., A.E. Austin, and M.D. Sorcinelli, Paradise Lost: How the academy converts enthusiastic recruits into early-career doubters. AAHEBulletin, 2001. 53(9): p. 3-6.

76. Trower, C.A., A.E. Austin, and M.D. Sorcinelli, Paradise Lost: How the academy converts enthusiastic recruits into early-career doubters. AAHEBulletin, 2001. 53(9): p. 3-6.

77. Trumbo, J., Essay: Seeing science. Science Communication, 2000. 21(4): p. 379-391.

78. Varian, H.C.-n.a., Ch.4: Options for Fostering Interdisciplinary Research and Improving Access to Results, in Fostering Research on the Economic and Social Impacts of Information Technology. 1998, National Academy Press: Washington, D.C.

79. Walters, L.M. and T.N. Walters, It Loses Something in the Translation: Syntax and Survival of Key Words in Science and Nonscience Press Releases. Science Communication, 1996. 18(2): p. 165-180.