****JavaScript based drop down DHTML menu generated by NavStudio. (OpenCube Inc. - http://www.opencube.com)****
Motor Symptoms Part 4
The motor changes associated with Huntington’s disease
What causes motor symptoms?
The reasons why HD causes motor symptoms are very complex
and not entirely clear. However, researchers have learned a great deal about
what may be at the root of the problem. In order to begin discussing why
motor symptoms occur, we first have to look at how movement is organized in
the brain. Motor control operates through two main pathways, which link the
cortex (the outer part of the brain, responsible for sophisticated
functions) with the basal ganglia (a grouping of cells found deep within
the brain, responsible for more basic functions). These pathways are termed
"direct" and "indirect." Before continuing, you may want to take a moment to
review these two pathways described here, in the Neurobiology of HD
section.
After reviewing the basics of the direct and indirect
motor pathways, we can examine this schematic diagram that combines the two
(Figure 1). Notice that there is an additional pathway: nerve cells in the
striatum also project, or link, onto a region of the basal ganglia called
the substantia nigra (as well as the globus pallidus), which then
projects directly back onto the striatum. Though it may seem odd to have a
simple loop added to this system, we will see that this pathway, the
striatonigral pathway, is very important to motor function.
In looking at the diagram, notice that along each
projection arrow there is the name of a particular chemical, known as a
neurotransmitter. Neurotransmitters are the means by which cells (and
brain regions) communicate with each other. One cell, the presynaptic cell, releases a neurotransmitter and another cell, the postsynaptic cell,
absorbs it. This chemical signal causes the postsynaptic cell to take some
sort of action, such as releasing a neurotransmitter or actively not
releasing one. Its response will then influence other cells farther down the
line. This progression of cell-to-cell chemical communication is the nuts
and bolts of the motor control pathways that we have been discussing.
You can see from the diagram that each motor pathway
involves a complex combination of neurotransmitters. Let’s walk through the
various pathways to get a clearer picture of how this all works. Remember
though, it is the overall concept of the pathways that is important, not the
names of each brain region and neurotransmitter.
The first step for all motor pathways is the cortex
receiving sensory information from the outside world, via sight, touch,
hearing, etc. It transmits this information to the striatum (part of the
basal ganglia) in chemical form, using a common neurotransmitter called
glutamate. Glutamate then causes the cells of the striatum to take action
in the following ways:
The direct pathway: Nerve cells in the striatum project
onto the internal part of the globus pallidus, using the neurotransmitters
GABA and substance P. The cells of the globus pallidus then use GABA in
their projections to the thalamus, a major relay and control center of the
brain. The thalamus completes the loop back to the cortex using more
neurotransmitters, sending its signals directly to the part of the cortex
devoted to motor control, the motor cortex. The motor cortex responds to
these signals (which originated in the basal ganglia, remember) by physically
moving the body in the appropriate way.
The indirect pathway: Striatal cells (cells in the
striatum) use GABA and enkephalin to project onto the outer part of the
globus pallidus. Globus pallidus cells then project to the subthalamus
using GABA, which in turn projects to the internal globus pallidus using
glutamate. From there the pathway is the same as the direct pathway,
progressing to the thalamus and then the motor cortex.
An important note: Certain neurotransmitters are
termed "excitatory" and others "inhibitory." Excitatory neurotransmitters
cause an action to take place in another cell or part of the body.
Inhibitory neurotransmitters prevent an action from occurring. All
projections that come from the basal ganglia (including the striatum, globus
pallidus, and substantia nigra) are inhibitory. We know that these cells are
involved in controlling the movement of the body, so therefore the
neurotransmitters from cells in the basal ganglia serve to prevent (or
inhibit) movement. Imagine you are sitting at a desk, writing on a piece of
paper. You are moving your hand and arm, but the rest of your body is still.
In order to keep the rest of your body still, the cells in your basal
ganglia are releasing inhibitory neurotransmitters constantly. In this
state, cells are said to be operating at their baseline firing rate.
"Baseline" refers to what is normal, because most of the time we want to
prevent movement in at least some parts of our body, and "firing rate" refers
to how frequently the neurotransmitters are released. Consider that while
you are at the desk writing, you see that you have made a mistake. This
visual sensory information reaches your cortex, and then is sent to your
basal ganglia. The basal ganglia realize that you will need to tell your
other arm to reach for an eraser. In order to stop inhibiting movement in
that arm, the basal ganglia must adjust its release of inhibitory
neurotransmitters. This modified signal is passed to the thalamus and then
the motor cortex. Because the motor cortex is no longer inhibited as much,
it can tell your other arm to reach for the eraser. When you have finished
using that arm, neurotransmitter release returns to normal, to the baseline
firing rate.
How does all this work in HD? Mutant huntingtin protein is expressed in all the cells of the body, but the most and earliest
damage is seen in the basal ganglia, and the striatum in particular. The
precise mechanism by which mutant huntingtin harms cells and causes them to
behave differently is not clear. However, we know that mutant huntingtin
causes serious problems with cell function and eventually leads to cell
death. Here is where an understanding of motor pathways comes in handy. The
early motor symptoms seen in HD are the result of damage to the striatum that
impacts the indirect pathway (although both pathways are affected at the same
time in juvenile HD). Damage from HD causes the striatum to release a weaker
chemical signal, resulting in less inhibitory neurotransmitters, less
inhibition of the motor cortex, and more movement. This movement is
unintended, the result of a pathway error, and is therefore called
"involuntary." Involuntary movements include the fidgeting, tics, and
chorea associated with early to middle stage HD. Later on in the disease
the direct pathway becomes increasingly affected. In this case, the striatum
still releases less inhibitory neurotransmitters, but in the direct pathway
this action leads to more inhibition of the motor cortex and less
movement. The result is rigidity of the body and bradykinesia, common to
late stage HD. So, looking at how the direct and indirect motor pathways
work and the motor symptoms we know to occur in HD, we can follow a logical
route from damage in the striatum to actual symptoms. But what causes the
neurotransmitter signals from the striatum to decrease in the first place?
Let’s first take a look at the third motor pathway in the diagram.
The striatonigral pathway: Nerve cells in the
striatum also project onto the substantia nigra, using GABA. The
substantia nigra then responds with dopamine, projecting straight back onto
the striatum. This dopamine signal influences both the direct and indirect
pathways, but with different results, even though both pathways are
responding to the same chemical signal. This is accomplished by having two
different kinds of dopamine receptors on the post-synaptic cells in the
striatum: D1 receptors link to the direct pathway and D2 receptors link to
the indirect. Dopamine that goes to D1 receptors causes the striatum to
release less inhibitory neurotransmitters, which ripples through the whole
direct pathway and ultimately leads to inhibition of the motor cortex
(preventing movement). Dopamine that goes to D2 receptors also causes the
striatum to release less inhibitory neurotransmitters, but because of a
different pathway progression, ultimately leads to less inhibition of the
motor cortex (causing movement).
Researchers think that the answer to why HD causes the
striatum to release a weaker chemical signal may be the striatonigral pathway
and dopamine. As we have discussed, HD seems to over-stimulate the motor
cortex via the indirect pathway and under-stimulate the motor cortex via the
direct pathway. Interestingly, this pattern matches up with the influence of
the striatonigral pathway on the other two pathways. When dopamine is
released from the substantia nigra, it inhibits the striatum, causing it to
release less inhibitory neurotransmitters. Let’s put these ideas together:
if an excess of dopamine is released from the substantia nigra, the indirect
pathway would over-stimulate the motor cortex and the direct pathway would
under-stimulate it, just like in HD. You can see why researchers started to
think that the striatonigral pathway and dopamine might be the key.
So what causes the substantia nigra to release more
dopamine? For a potential answer we must trace the pathway back even
further. Remember that as soon as the striatum receives a sensory message
from the cortex, it sends a signal to the substantia nigra, via the
neurotransmitter GABA, which then influences the substantia nigra’s release
of dopamine. These two neurotransmitters go back and forth like a seesaw:
more GABA means less dopamine and vice versa. Researchers have found that
cells in the striatum that release GABA selectively degenerate due to
damage from mutant huntingtin. GABA is an inhibitory neurotransmitter like
all those in the basal ganglia. Therefore, if striatal cells are damaged and
release less GABA, the substantia nigra is less inhibited and will release
more dopamine. An increase in dopamine would inhibit the striatum, which is
consistent with the pattern seen in HD.
It is important to note, however, that scientific studies
have not been able to show conclusively that dopamine levels are increased in
HD. Indeed, post-mortem studies of people with HD have shown elevated,
depleted, and unchanged levels of dopamine in the brain. Additionally, the
striatum uses GABA in its projections to both parts of the globus pallidus,
not just the substantia nigra. Therefore, damage to the striatum from HD
could lessen the release of GABA to the globus pallidus and thus the two main
pathways directly, not just via the striatonigral pathway.
Nonetheless, many researchers are confident that dopamine
is important to HD, even at endogenous, or natural, levels. Dopamine may
in fact play an even more integral role in striatal cell damage, by causing
the damage, not just influencing the pathway. One major question for
researchers has been, why the striatum? Why is the basal ganglia harmed by
mutant huntingtin, and not other cells? Recent studies suggest that the
presence of dopamine is correlated with cell damage in HD. If this is the
case, only cells in which dopamine was present would degenerate, and those
with more dopamine would degenerate first. This theory would explain why
cells in the striatum degenerate first. Charvin and others (2005) have shown
that both dopamine and mutant huntingtin can activate a transcription factor known as c-jun. Transcription factors can influence a cell in many
different ways; c-jun leads to programmed cell death, or apoptosis. When
dopamine and mutant huntingtin are present together, the level of c-jun is
greatly increased. The way that dopamine activates c-jun is as follows:
dopamine can autooxidize, or in other words, spontaneously undergo a
reaction that leads to reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS are bad for the
cell, and usually lead to cell damage. To prevent this damaged cell from
hurting the rest of the body, the cell activates c-jun to start the process
of programmed cell death (apoptosis). Therefore, the apoptosis of one cell
is a good defense mechanism for the body. When mutant huntingtin is present,
however, far too many cells induce apoptosis. Also, as we age, autooxidation
of dopamine naturally increases. You can imagine that in someone with HD,
more and more apoptosis due to dopamine combined with the presence of mutant
huntingtin, could result in significant problems. This theory may therefore
explain HD’s late age of onset. (For more information about the theory of
oxidative stress and HD, click here).
Charvin and others proposed another role for dopamine in
striatal cell damage. As previously mentioned, there are two kinds of
dopamine receptors in the striatum: D1 for the direct pathway and D2 for the
indirect. D2 receptors are more significantly implicated in HD. This makes
sense, given that the indirect pathway is affected first. Charvin et al.
suggest that D2 receptors are over-stimulated. Their theory also says that,
as dopamine passes through the D2 receptors, it contributes to the formation
of aggregates (or clumps) of the mutant huntingtin protein within the cell.
Aggregates of mutant huntingtin are a common pathological marker in HD,
meaning that they are present in cells affected by HD. It is unclear,
however, what the function of these aggregates actually is. They may be
harmful, helpful, or not have any effect on the cell at all. (For more
information on protein aggregates, click here).
Scientific studies have consistently noted that dopamine
receptors (D1 and D2) are depleted in HD. This may seem strange, as we have
been suggesting that the presence of dopamine (or perhaps the excess of
dopamine) is the reason why HD motor symptoms occur. Although the depletion
of receptors is well known, the cause of the depletion is not. D2 receptors,
for the indirect pathway, are depleted first, with more D1 receptors, for the
direct pathway, disappearing as HD progresses. One possibility is that too
much dopamine may be toxic to the receptors, thus killing them off. It may
also be the case that cells try to protect themselves from an excess of
dopamine, or its toxic influence in the presence of mutant huntingtin, by
actively losing receptors. Another possibility is related to brain-derived
neurotrophic factor (BDNF). BDNF is a chemical that protects cells in the
brain, and its function has been shown to be impaired in HD. The loss of
BDNF could make it much easier for receptors to be damaged, as well as
allowing for the mutant huntingtin/dopamine synergistic damage to occur in
the first place. (For more information on BDNF, click here). It is also possible that
mutant huntingtin harms receptors directly. Regardless of the specific cause
of receptor depletion, much damage from dopamine can occur by the time
depletion becomes significant. Additionally, if the striatum is absorbing
less dopamine, an increased release of dopamine could be triggered in the
substantia nigra. A reduced number of receptors can also lead to greater
sensitivity of the remaining receptors, ultimately resulting in more dopamine
absorption and damage. As you can see, cell-to-cell communication is very
complex and intricate. Though this fact makes it difficult to determine just
how HD affects the brain, it does give researchers many ideas about what to
look at next, as well as offer many possibilities for treatments.
So what does all this mean for HD treatments? Currently
in the U.S. there are few medications that are prescribed to treat motor
symptoms of HD, and none that are particularly aimed at chorea. However,
experimental drugs that deplete dopamine have been reported to have positive
effects on motor symptoms. The best-studied drug, tetrabenazine, should
soon be available in the U.S. and will be discussed in detail in the chapter linked to below. As we learn more and more about the cause of HD damage in the
brain, we can develop new treatments that are aimed at specific mechanisms.
Future medications may target ROS production, dopamine absorption through D2
receptors, or initiation of the c-jun pathway, to name a few. These new
kinds of treatments will hopefully prove to be more effective than current
options, impacting the progression of HD in a meaningful way.
We hope you enjoyed this section of the HOPES website. To email this article to a friend, please click here. To leave feedback for the HOPES team, click here. Make sure to specify which article you're referring to.
-C. Tobin 6-29-06
For further reading:
Bates, G., Harper, P., & Jones, L. Huntington’s
Disease. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. pp. 28-37, 276-281.
This book is a thorough review of current knowledge about HD, but is
very scientifically-oriented.
Canals, J.M., et al. “Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
regulates the onset and severity of motor dysfunction associated with
enkephalinergic neuronal degeneration in Huntington’s disease.” 2004.
Journal of Neuroscience. 24(35): 7727-7739.
An article about BDNF and HD.
Charvin, D. “Unraveling a role for dopamine in
Huntington’s disease: the dual role of reactive oxygen species and and D2
receptor stimulation.” 2005. PNAS? 102(34): 12218-12223.
This article presents the possible mechanisms for how dopamine may
damage striatal cells.
Dr. Joseph F. Smith Medical Library. “Huntington’s
disease.” http://www.chclibrary
.org/micromed/00051720.html A description of motor symptoms and alternative treatments for HD,
such as occupational, speech, and physical therapies.
Gazzaniga, M.S., Irvy, R.B., & Mangun, G.R.
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind. New York: W.W. Norton
& Company, 2002. pp. 488-492.
This is a textbook covering many topics in neurobiology. It is rather
technical.
Hickey, M.A., et al. “The role of dopamine in motor
systems in the R6/2 transgenic mouse model of Huntington’s disease.” 2002.
Journal of Neurochemistry. 81: 46-59.
A good study of dopamine and HD in a mouse model.
Indiana State University. “Huntington’s disease.” http://web.indstate.ed
u/thcme/anderson/RPI.html This site has a good schematic diagram of motor pathways, and a more
involved discussion of energy metabolism in HD.
International Huntington Association. “Huntington’s
disease.” http://www.huntington-assoc
.com/huntin.htm A summary of the progression of HD, in terms of motor, cognitive, and
behavioral symptoms.
Jakel, R.J., & Maragos, W.F. “Neuronal cell death in
Huntington’s disease: a potential role for dopamine.” 2000. Trends in
Neuroscience, 23: 239-245.
This is a good article that reviews the potential mechanisms for cell
damage as a result of HD.
Nieuwenhuys, R., Voogd, J., & van Huijzen, C. The
Human Central Nervous System: a Synopsis and Atlas. New York:
Springer-Verlag, 1981. pp. 169-173.
A highly technical book that details neuroanatomy.
Petersen, A., et al. “Mice transgenic for exon1 of the
Huntington’s disease gene display reduced striatal sensitivity to
neurotoxicity induced by dopamine and 6-hydroxydopamine.” 2001. European
Journal of Neuroscience. 14:1425-1435.
This is a rather complex article that discusses the potential for
dopamine toxicity in striatal cells.
Pineda, J.R., et al. “Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
modulates dopaminergic deficits in a mouse model of Huntington’s disease.”
2005. Journal of Neurochemistry. 93: 1057-1068.
More on BDNF.
Reynolds, D., et al. “Dopamine modulates the
susceptibility of striatal neurons to 3-nitropropionic acid in the rat model
of Huntington’s disease.” 1998. Journal of Neuroscience. 18(23): 10116-10127.
This article is one of the earlier articles to show that dopamine is
important to cell damage in HD.
We Move. “Medical management of Huntington’s disease.”
http://www.wemove.org/hd/hd_tr
e_mm.html A brief discussion of available medical treatments for HD and their
potential consequences.
Click here to return to the The Diagnosis of Huntington's Disease page.
Last Modified: 08/04/2008
An educational product of HOPES, not to be used in place of medical care. For more information about HOPES, click on the Logo.
To contact HOPES with comments or questions, click here.