Sneak Preview: How ISS Dictates Equity Plan Design (CGRP-37)
Authors: Profiessor Ian Gow, Harvard Business School, Professor David F. Larcker, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Allan McCall, PhD 2013 and Brian Tayan, MBA 2003, Researchers, Center for Leadership Development and Research, Stanford GSB.
Publishing Date: October 23, 2013
Proxy advisory firms are highly influential in the design and approval of equity compensation plans.
The largest proxy advisory firm—Institutional Shareholder Services—uses a variety of tests to determine its recommendation on equity plan proposals. Among these is a proprietary metric called Shareholder Value Transfer (SVT). ISS automatically recommends a vote against a company’s equity plan if its SVT exceeds a certain allowable cap that is determined by ISS. At the same time, ISS provides little transparency into the computation of this cap and instead sells companies access to this information.
A growing body of evidence suggests that companies pay significant attention to their SVT caps and rely on this information to design their equity plans.
We examine this issue in detail. We ask:
* Should market participants be concerned with ISS’s influence over equity plan design?
* Without transparent disclosure, how can shareholders be sure that ISS’s SVT allowable caps are “correct”?
* Does profit motive affect ISS’s incentive to be transparent about the computation and disclosure of SVT caps?
Read the attached Closer Look and let us know what you think!
Topics, Issues and Controversies in Corporate Governance and Leadership: The Closer Look series is a collection of short case studies through which we explore topics, issues, and controversies in corporate governance. In each study, we take a targeted look at a specific issue that is relevant to the current debate on governance and explain why it is so important. Larcker and Tayan are co-authors of the books Corporate Governance Matters and A Real Look at Real World Corporate Governance.