There is a consistent pattern that emerges when a company suffers from a major governance failure: the stock price falls, the company faces lawsuits, and there is elevated turnover in both the executive suite and the boardroom.
The impact on the careers of the former executives and directors of these companies is less clear. Recent experience suggests that many CEOs and directors of failed companies are able to retain outside directorships–and even obtain new ones–following their forced departures.
1. Should this be a concern for shareholders?
2. What is the standard by which the culpability of an executive or director should be measured? When are they “too tainted” by their experience to serve at other companies?
3. Is it plausible that officers and directors involved in an accounting or ethical problem can “learn valuable lessons” from the experience?
Read the attached Closer Look and let us know what you think!
To receive monthly alerts about the Closer Look series, please email the Stanford Corporate Governance Research Program at corpgovernance@gsb.stanford.edu. You can also follow more corporate governance news at http://twitter.com/#!/StanfordCorpGov. To see the entire collection of the Stanford Closer Look series, please click here.
This entry was posted
on Thursday, September 1st, 2011 at 8:01 am and is filed under Board of Directors, CEOs, Closer Look Series, Corporate Governance, Corporate Governance Research, Shareholder and Activism.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
