By many measures, current CEOs should be the best candidates to serve on boards of directors. They have extensive strategic, operational, and risk management expertise, as well as experiences and leadership attributes that are important for a firm’s long-term success.
However, there is currently no widely accepted, rigorous study that demonstrates that current CEOs are better board members or that companies with CEO directors benefit in terms of improved advice or monitoring. In fact, recent survey data suggests that active CEOs might not always be the best board members because of the time constraints of their full time job and personality attributes that may make it difficult for them to contribute constructively to a boardroom environment.
We examine this issue in closer detail and ask:
1. Should companies reassess the importance of this criteria when looking for new board members?
2. Does the requirement for CEO-level experience limit the pool of available directors, particularly diversity candidates who may be less likely to have this experience?
3. If the availability of CEO directors is low, should professional directors be recruited to fill the gap?
4. Do the positive qualities of a retired CEO deteriorate, or do they never become outdated?
Read the attached Closer Look and let us know what you think!
To receive monthly alerts about the Closer Look series, please email the Stanford Corporate Governance Research Program at firstname.lastname@example.org. You can also follow more corporate governance news at http://twitter.com/#!/StanfordCorpGov.To see all of the Stanford Closer Look series, click here.