 |
|
Tuesday,
Jan. 18: proposal presentation materials due on Forum
Wednesday,
Jan 19 - Monday, Jan 24: proposal
presentations by individual assignment |
 |
| The
proposal presentation should be 3 minutes in length (you will be
cut off if you exceed this time limit -- really). |
Having
completed their formal written proposals, students will "translate"
them into a 3-minute oral presentation that they will deliver to the
class.
| Why
are we doing this? |
Since
PWR2 is concerned explicitly with encouraging students to examine
the rhetorical distinctions among "presentations" in
various forms (i.e., written, oral, and multimedia), for this
assignment, you will convert your written project proposal into
a 3 minute oral/multimedia presentation. As you produce your text,
be sure to consider the five
canons of rhetoric -- invention,
arrangement, style, memory and delivery -- and the way in which
your use of these canons might change across media. Also keep
in mind the rhetorical situation of your presentation: you'll
need to attend to your audience -- making your point and
keeping their interest -- as well as to your text and to your
own ethos as an author.
|
| How
do the Five Canons of Rhetoric relate to my presentation? |
- Invention:
Your presentation may or may not be similiar in form, content,
or voice to your proposal. Use creativity to select the approach
and structure most appropriate to your purpose and rhetorical
situation. Your presentation may be an overview of your formal
proposal -- or you may use a single example to provide a groundwork
for your argument. Also consider creative frameworks for your
presentation -- structuring it as a movie trailer, a behind-the-scenes
look at your project in progress, or even an expose. Note: the
most successful presentations do not necessarily follow the
proposal format but instead center around a single central example.
- Arrangement:
You
need to consider how you will arrange, organize, and structure
your talk. This means both outlining your presentation and,
if you are using slides, considering the most appropriate use
of audio and/or visual materials. The presentation should have
a clear beginning, middle and end.
- Style:
You
need to decide on the voice of your presentation, as well as
your own persona as a rhetor. Will you invite audience participation?
Will you hold allow audience comments only at the end? Will
you approach your audience as a peer? As an expert in your subject?
Will you be formal or informal in approach? All these questions
are starting points for thinking about the style of your presentation.
- Memory:
This canon has as much to do with improvisation (i.e., being
able to read your audience and adapt your presentation to suite
their current needs) as it does with memorization or a level
of comfort with your material.
- Delivery:
You will need to decide on the method by which you
will deliver your material. This involves considering whether
you will use audio or visual aids as well as embodied rhetorics,
such as the way you comport yourself, dress, or project your
voice while presenting.
For
your presentation, you must clearly convey your topic to your
audience -- such as it is currently defined -- as well as your
working hypothesis, and you must do so within 3 minutes. Keep
in mind that all presentations will be on works in progress
so that no one will expect you to have arrived at definitive conclusions
or to have completed your research. However, your presentation,
like your proposal, should nevertheless offer the audience a well-developed
understanding of the topic you're addressing, your approach to
it, and your research methodology.
|
| What
extra resources do you recommend for this assignment? |
| For
your proposal presentation, you should review Lunsford & Ruszkiewicz,
"Spoken
Arguments, which is required for the blog entry for this week.
You may also find chapter 6 in Envision a helpful resource.
Finally, you should e-mail
me, IM me, or talk to me in class if you have any questions.
|
|