 |
|
M Nov 1
- visual
map due (post in your Forum folder as an exported jpeg or hand
in a paper copy) |
 |
| Your
visual map should contain a working breakdown of the organization
of your paper, using a graphics or clustering program, that follows
through on your argument to at least 3 levels of specification
and includes a phrase or sentence description for each node/bubble. |
- What
is the assignment?
- For this assignment,
you will construct your own visual map of your hypertext, using Inspiration
or the graphics program of your choice. You can use the visual
map that you will begin in class on Friday the 29th as a starting
point, or you can create an entirely new one.
-
- Why
are we doing this?
- The goal with this assignment
is to begin to conceptualize the differences between organizing your
research project as a linked hypertext instead of a linear academic
essay; this assignment encourages you to start experimenting with
the architecture of the site so you have a firm foundation in place
when you begin drafting the hypertext as a whole. Basically, the visual
map offers you the same opportunity to structure your argument that
a traditional outline does. However, it encourages you to do so in
a way that more accurately reflects the non-linear format of a hypertext.
How does this
assignment fit in with the different steps of our research project?
- By this point in the
quarter, you should have completed substantial research on your
project through looking at both primary and secondary sources, working
with on-line resources, using the libraries, and perhaps even conducting
first-hand research through fieldwork, interviews, and surveys.
However, as you approach the task of taking your notes and transforming
them into a formal written product, you may find yourself somewhat
confounded by the difference between writing a traditional linear
argument (i.e. a traditional research paper) and composing a research
hypertext.
During class, we will
spend some time discussing visual maps of existing websites as a means
of understanding the unique ways in which information is chunked,
linked, and ordered in hypertext. In particular, we looked at a series
of sample research hypertexts from the Winter
2001 CS201 class and from the Winter
2004 E-Rhetoric class in order to think about best practices for
website design for an argumentative text.
By creating your own visual
maps, you will be building on these discussions as well as completing
an important first step toward organizing information for your research
hypertext.
What features
should our visual maps contain?
The visual maps of individual
students will vary in shape and complexity; however, here are some
basic guidelines:
- At
this point, try to have each bubble in your visual map equal one
node/page of your hypertext.
That is -- try to conceptualize the project in terms of the different
pages you'll create, not just the different points you intend to
make.
- The
visual maps should contain a central or top-level homepage that
branches into a clearly definable series of at least three or four
major paths
(i.e. major sections of your topic). That is, if your topic were
Feminism and Cyborgs in contemporary Film, you would have one bubble
labelled with that title and then, branching from that central bubble,
four different bubbles -- one for T4, one for BladeRunner, one for
AI and one for the Bionic Woman (if, that is, you planned to structure
your argument around these four texts). In doing so, you will create
a 1st (Fem & Cyborgs bubble) and 2nd level (the films) of pages.
- After you've established
your paths, keep branching to at least
a second or third level (you can take it as far
as you want beyond that) -- remember, each bubble represents a page
(sometimes called a "node").
- Within
in each bubble, at a minimum include a sentence or phrase
that describes the content of that node/bubble/chunk. You can write
more if you like (you can even link to drafts of those nodes if
you're that far along in the process, but that's in no way required).
Consider using the note function in Inspiration to expand your thoughts.
- Use
color, shape, etc.
to help delineate the progression of thought or the relationship
between ideas.
- You will probably find
this mode of organization moves you away from a progressive, linear
argument, and toward a more dynamic, reader-oriented model. However,
your hypertext should nevertheless
contain a strong line of interpretation or argument that
is developed within each topic or subtopic page.
Please note: your visual
map will not be as detailed as those you constructed when you retro-mapped
the research hypertexts that we looked at in class. It will not contain
the complexity of linking between the different nodes that we saw
in those articles. However, like any outline, it should be as comprehensive
as you can make it at this time.
Keep in mind that there
is no right way to construct the visual map. This is part of
a process, an opportunity for experimentation. Your grade will be
based on your effort, innovation, and the nature of your arrangement/structure
for your hypertext.
- What additional
resources are available to me?
- For an overview of how
to approach writing and organizing a hypertext, you might find the
"webpage" section of chapter 8 of Envision
to provide some helpful tips. Keep in mind, however, that for this
assignment, you are focusing not so much on aesthetic and rhetorical
design as much as the structure/organization of your hypertext. In
addition, review the Multimedia
Design website for ideas about organizing
information.
Also, feel free to e-mail
me, IM me, or talk to me in class if you have any questions
about this assignment or the project as a whole.
|