 |
|
Fr Dec 3 --
Reflection essay due
by 5pm to your Forum folder. |
 |
| Your
reflection essay should be a Microsoft Word document that is posted
up to your Forum folder. It should be between 2-3 pages in length,
should contain an introduction, main body, and conclusion, and like
any formal written piece should have a strong internal structure
and clear prose style. You can use first person in this reflection,
but be sure to spend some time revising and polishing the prose. |
- What is the
assignment?
-
- For this assignment,
you will write a reflective essay in which you evaluate your work
on the research project in PWR2, most specifically your work on the
hypertext. In it, you should assess the choices you made in producing
the hypertext in terms of matching form and content, understanding
e-rhetoric and the demands of the electronic medium, and constructing
a digital argument. In short, you should look at this essay as an
opportunity to make an argument about writing in hypertext, and you
should use your own project as evidence in support of that argument.
-
- What
specific questions should we address?
- At some point in your
reflection, you should address the following questions:
- How do you assess
your project in terms of Mary Hocks's categories of audience stance,
transparency, and hybridity?
- How did producing
a research hypertext resemble and differ from your experience
of producing a traditional academic research paper in PWR1? Please
focus on the changes you made to account for the different medium.
- What did writing
in hypertext allow you to do that you could not have done in another
medium/genre/or mode of writing?
- How satisfied are
you with the results of your choices? What would you like to be
able to do over again or spend more time on?
- This final
question is of particular importance: What new goals
can you now set for yourself as a writer and rhetor as a result
of what you have learned/accomplished in this class?
Please link or refer
to specific pages in your hypertext, specific articles or websites
that were instructive in your own understanding of the project and
process, and use language informed by an understanding of both rhetoric
and digital communication. Don't forget the power of visual
evidence as well: screenshots are quite welcome in this paper!
E-mail
me, IM me, or talk to me in class if you have any questions about
this assignment. |