<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shah, Manish N.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Clarkson, Lindsay</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lerner, E.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fairbanks, Rollin J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">McCann, Robert</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Schneider, Sandra M.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">An Emergency Medical Services Program to Promote the Health of Older Adults</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of the American Geriatrics Society</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">*Emergency Services</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">*Health Promotion</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">*Needs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">emergency medical services program, older adults, unmet needs, health promotion</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Human Male Female Adulthood (18 yrs &amp; older) Aged (65 yrs &amp; older) Very Old (85 yrs &amp; older)</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Promotion &amp; Maintenance of Health &amp; Wellness [3365]</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">us</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jun</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=psyc5&AN=2006-08071-009</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">54</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">956-962</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">0002-86141532-5415</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">English</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and effect of an emergency medical services (EMS) program that screened, educated, and referred older adults with unmet needs. DESIGN: A cluster sample design evaluation of an intervention conducted by EMS in one of two communities. Setting: Two rural communities in upstate New York. Participants: Two hundred fifty-eight intervention-group and 143 control-group community-dwelling older adults receiving emergency care from participating EMS agencies between February 2004 and June 2005. Intervention: EMS providers screened intervention group patients to identify those at risk for falls, influenza, and pneumococcal infections and provided patients educational materials. Patients' physicians were notified of screening results to provide interventions. Control group patients were provided usual care. Measurements: Variables included patient demographic and clinical characteristics, the proportion of eligible patients screened, patient risk during EMS care and 14 days later, and patient recollection of receiving educational materials and conversations with physicians regarding needs. Results: Follow-up was successful in 245 (61%) patients. Approximately 80% of intervention-group patients were successfully screened for each item. No differences were identified for characteristics collected at the time of EMS care, but a notable number of patients were at risk for each item. No differences existed between the control or intervention group for process measures such as recollection of receiving educational materials. For outcome measures, only an improvement in pneumococcal vaccination levels was found. Conclusion: EMS screening of older adults during emergency responses is feasible, but a simple intervention of providing educational materials to patients during emergency responses and faxing notifications to physicians appears insufficient to address patients' needs. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) (journal abstract).</style></abstract><accession-num><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peer Reviewed Journal: 2006-08071-009</style></accession-num><auth-address><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BrookeShah, Manish N.: Manish_Shah@urmc.rochester.eduShah, Manish N.: Department of Emergency Medicine, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 655, Rochester, NY, US, 14642, Manish_Shah@urmc.rochester.eduShah, Manish N.: Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, US Clarkson, Lindsay: Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, US Lerner, E. Brooke: Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, US Fairbanks, Rollin J.: Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, US McCann, Robert: Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, US Schneider, Sandra M.: Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, US</style></auth-address></record></records></xml>