Home Up Contents

Sample Responses
 

Following are three writing sample cases that will help to illustrate the differences between high and low conceptual complexity.

Writing samples-low complexity

Writing samples-high complexity

Low Conceptual Complexity Example #1

I haven’t changed my decision – if anything it is reinforced. After hearing the opinions of the other people in the group – who were all in favor of the resolution – I still believe strongly that it is the responsibility of the commercial, global enterprises to exert pressure on the international community to promote humanitarian aims such as decent living wages, and humane working conditions and to work towards ending child labor such as we see in developing nations. Only with this pressure will can the abhorrent conditions reported in these nations gradually change. It is the imperative of especially Western or 1st World multinationals to work towards this goal of a more humane world with the understanding that everyone deserves this – not just the fortunate few.

 

Low Conceptual Complexity Example #2

In my first response I was mistaken in thinking that the Allsport Company would be shut down. In fact it is just Global Industries which would end distribution of Allsport. In this case, I fully agree with the resolution. To continue distribution would be to ignore this great moral injustice. Indeed Global Industries’s revenues would be affected, but being such a large company, the change would not be that significant. It is much more significant to make a statement about the millions of children working for Allsport. Discontinuing distribution would sent a message not only to other companies, but also to consumers who might reconsider purchasing Allsport products and to the government of Asiana that might be influenced into making policy changes about child labor and working conditions. I do not know the exact repercussions that this resolution would have on Global Industries financially but the moral weight of the issue overrides any concern with revenue.

Low Conceptual Complexity Example #3

No monetary gain justifies continued support of the outrageous child labor practices outlined above. The children who work in Allsport factories are victims of an incredible disregard for basic human rights. If I were a member of the Board of Directors for Global Industries, there is no way I would be able to live with myself while knowing the awful practices my company was perpetuating. Any company that distributes Allsport products is supporting and helping to continue child exploitation. Furthermore, any individual who purchases Allsport products is participating in this process. Unfortunately, I think too few people are aware of the extent to which many companies exploit their foreign workers. However, when information about a specific company is exposed to you, shattering your ignorance, I don't see how anyone could continue to support that company with a clear conscience.

 

High Conceptual Complexity Example #1

I agree with the proposition to discontinue distribution of Allsport wear. I think that refusing to distribute products made from child labor would send an important message to other large companies also employing the use of children. I would vote to discontinue marketing of Allsport wear.  At the same time, however, a number of factors must also be examined before discontinuing the product. The information given does not state how large a portion Allsport wear has in Global Industries' distribution of products. Would discontinuation cause severe economic decline and hurt the business? If Global Industries will be profoundly influenced economically with its decision to forgo Allsports wear, other measures might have to be taken. Because Global Industries is only a distributor and not actually marketing the product, they aren't responsible for the way in which their clients choose to manufacture their goods. Global Industries could send a message to other marketers by boycotting Allsportswear entirely, for ethical reasons, but if this discontinuation is going to cause Global Industries to fold, such drastic measures should not be taken.

Is Global Industries the sole distributor for Allsports wear? If so, they could negotiate a way to lessen the inhumane manufacturing processes abroad without actually discontinuing the products. They might be able to persuade Allsports wear to lessen labor hours, regulate education and protect wages with the threat of discontinuation. This way, both companies could still profit.

With the information given at this point, I would vote "yes" on the proposal. I think, however, that an in-depth analysis into the economic impact and compromising alternatives would help.

High Conceptual Complexity Example #2

My opinion on the Resolution hasn’t changed where the due to the discussion but my I’ve been forced to consider the trickier economic side of the situation. There are many facets of this problem that aren’t presented in the ‘summary & Resolution’. The astounding statistics on the prevalence of child labor and the dire health consequences associated provide a strong ethical argument for the resolution.

But there is no information given that would suggest the possible negative effects of this resolution. If All-Sport is a major multinational company, they probably employ many adults in addition to their child laborers. [Illegible, crossed-out text] Forcing All-sport to shut down operations may result in the loss of many jobs in third world countries. Though it would be ideal to [illegible, crossed-out text] completely abolish all multinational corporations that are found to commit human rights violations, this just is not realistic. As much as I am disheartened by the fact that most corporations will ‘clean up their act’ solely [illegible, crossed-out text] due to financial [illegible, crossed-out text] pressure, and not because of some sort of humanistic enlightenment, it may be the only option.

Multinational corporations can provide a boost to developing economies and supply many jobs to impoverished people. If these [?] rather than trying [?] If every

Thus, [illegible, crossed-out text] if the resolution succeeds in ruining All-Sport, it may be backfiring on its own humane ideals. Perhaps an ultimatum should be made (after business is ended), in which ‘we’ would offer to recontinue business only if standards for humane working conditions for all employees were implemented.

High Conceptual Complexity Example #3

I would vote against this resolution to discontinue distribution of Allsport sportswear. I feel that there is so much more behind having child labor in our factories, like the economy and the wealth of families. Obviously, they feel the need and necessity to work and work for next to nothing. I feel that as a company we should take a more direct approach to the situation, perhaps implementing health and safety regulations and raising the salary of workers, also ensuring proper working days. If we choose to discontinue distribution of Allsport there will be 2 bad effects a) we will lose their business, which is quite a lot of money and 2) we will have done nothing to solve the problem that we stand against. I feel it is important to show other companies that we are more involved with the situation and trying to alleviate some of the harsh conditions. This will have a more positive effect on the world and hopefully on the children and families working over there, it will also allow us to continue to do business with Allsport and stay in business.

 

Home ] Up ]

Send mail to wperez@stanford.edu with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: 02/04/03