Research Proposal: Educating a New Generation
This assignment was created by students at The City College of New York for the Freshman Inquiry Writing Seminar, Web Discourse. Students are researching a social issue in one of four large topics: Urban Life, Public Health, Immigration, and Education. This will result in a final research paper that explores both how the conversations surrounding the issue are enacted and how a CCNY student may enter that conversation in a meaningful way.
I would like to research the learning differences between members of the current parent generation, and their children as it pertains to the education system. I will show that today’s children are not learning the skills that they need in order to succeed in society outside of school. I will then show why I think this is happening. In the last pages, I will acknowledge arguments to the contrary of my thesis. Some anticipated arguments are that today’s generation is simply less focused and hardworking than generations past due to a technological overload it has experienced throughout its young life. I will disprove this. I will also argue that the current generation has the untapped ability to succeed at levels never previously anticipated, and that they may be able to close the math and science gap between America, and some of its eastern rivals.
This topic deserves my vested interest because the fate of future generations depends on the outcome of this technological, educational, and neurological debate. Many ideas on education reform are being discussed, but none of them are drastic enough to enact the change I envision. The academic community needs solid research to show them how and why the very paradigm teaching is based on needs to change. I believe that I can not only collect that research, but form a cohesive argument that could be valuable in that debate.
My working thesis is as follows: Today’s children are no longer the people our education system was designed to teach.
Many questions about my topic remain unanswered. The most prominent one is as to whether research cited by articles I’ve read that contradict my argument holds any weight. My life experiences directly contradict such research, and I intend to disprove it. I also need to discover whether my ideas have been tested in isolated circumstances, and to what effect.
I will research mostly through personal interview, and through scholarly journals. This topic is a popular one among article writers, and there will be a wealth of information available.
It will be challenging to object to an argument that has gained a lot of weight in the scholarly world. I, however, firmly believe that hundreds of intelligent people can believe in something that is completely and utterly wrong.
Comments
I can see from reading your post why you commented on mine (the use of videogames in education). Our topics are rather closely linked.
I too suspect that today's students are not stunted by their exposure to technology as many claim, but, if anything, have even greater potential because of it.
Probably the majority of schools still operate using methods resembling those from fifty years ago, and we are doing generation after generation a great disservice.
It might not be a bad idea to focus on math and science education. After all, this is an area in which we have a glaring, obvious disadvantage to many other educational systems. I have always wondered why other nations, especially in Asia, educate their students so effectively in mathematics. I wonder how complicated the answer to this question will be, and how applicable their methods will be to schools here in the states.
Could you send me your paper, at some point? The first part of my research paper is going to have to at least describe the ways our education system might be reducing this generation's intellectual potential.
Anyway, thanks for directing me to Marc Prensky's website. That's awesome that you know him.
-Franklin Holme, Stanford
Posted by: Franklin | October 26, 2009 09:44 AM
I would be happy to send you my paper when it's finished.
The whole math and science issue, from the information I've gathered so far, is a sticky one. Although we always talk about how much more proficient eastern countries are in these subjects, the data doesn't necessarily support such a claim.
Take China for example. Everybody is under the impression that the Chinese are better educated in math. According to international math test scores, this isn't actually true. The few countries that do beat out the U.S. include Singapore, Hungary, and Korea.
We also always talk about how our education system is failing, yet our test scores have shown a consistent improvement from year to year since the 1960's.
Yet, we still see the effects of our education system in everyday life. Overall population intelligence in America feels like it drops every day. This leads me to believe that we are either holding our children to low testing standards, or that true intelligence is unquantifiable. I fear both are true.
It will prove difficult to identify the problem without data, even though it's so glaringly obvious through everyday experience.
Either way, I'll let you know how it goes.
Posted by: Russell Phelan, CCNY | October 26, 2009 10:04 AM
I've rewritten my proposal in an effort to refine my focus, and elaborate on my methods.
It is available in PDF format behind this link. Comments and suggestions are welcome.
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/2223067/Research%20Proposal.pdf
Posted by: Russell Phelan, CCNY | October 26, 2009 07:08 PM