« To be feminist or not to be evangelical – that is the questions. | Main | Race and Religion: Should Christian Congregations be Multiracial? »

The "Scientific Validity" of Online Dating

This entry is part of a research project for Cultural Interfaces and Cross-Cultural Rhetoric at Stanford University. For more about this assignment and the class projects, click here.

Online dating is an incredible presence in our society. In 2006, it was reported that 74 percent of single Americans looking for partners had used the Internet in an attempt to find romance (Whitty 1). Internet users are flocking to online dating websites, such as eHarmony, Match.com, and True, which all advertise the ease with which they can match users with compatible and fate-prescribed partners. We all want to feel loved and accepted by somebody, as well as confident that the ways we are achieving this goal will work. This need is wisely taken advantage of in marketing strategies for online dating websites – these websites are, after all, businesses first and foremost.

I wanted to share an article that I found in a 2004 issue of the North American Journal of Psychology, called “Do Online Matchmaking Tests Work? An Assessment of Preliminary Evidence for a Publicized ‘Predictive Model of Marital Success.’” Right away this source caught my attention, since its first author is James Houran, who lists his affiliation as “TRUE, LLC” (Houran 507). Since the author of this source is associated with one of the most widely-used online dating websites, bias is a strong possibility in this source. Houran’s primary argument is that since compatibility is the big buzz word in online dating culture, online matchmakers need to be more thorough about making publicly available their evidence for claiming that their compatibility tests are scientifically valid (Houran 508). He then goes on to point out that eHarmony, Match.com, and PerfectMatch.com all describe the scientific validity of their matchmaking methods, but none provide specific empirical evidence in support of this.

This sounds like a legitimate argument. However, upon paying a visit to Houran’s site True, I discovered that it was even less satisfactory than the sites he wrote about in providing substantiation for its claims. “Scientific compatibility testing” is a listed selling point, but no elaboration existed; I could not even find links to another page that described True’s process or analyses. I was surprised by this, since Houran wrote his paper with such an air of authority and conviction – however, this shows that I was fooled by his attempts to make his website sound better by putting down his competitors.

In his conclusion, Houran states, “The prospect that millions of singles are making life-changing decisions based on compatibility tests that are not scientifically sound is a sobering one” (521). My question is, how is finding love without scientific intervention such a “sobering” idea? People have been doing it for centuries; “scientific” is not always better when it comes to love, because often love is beyond reason. This quote seemed to imply that online dating websites are the one way to accomplish this, but no matter how much technology we have at our disposal, daters are still perfectly capable of finding love the more old-fashioned, human way.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://cgi.stanford.edu/~group-ccr/mt/mt-tb.cgi/367

Comments

You brought up a very interesting topic there Jill. I for one think that online dating can be used for improving ones confident factor before the meet up. Online dating can also utilized wrongly thus necessary precautions should also be taken. Google online for safe online dating tips and you should be okay.

As for me, i'd still prefer the old fashion way. :)

There are a number of people on online dating sites in that emotionally rocky position, which is dangerous for them and for you, too, as a potential, unintended victim of their needs.
a thoughtfully Tamara from Partnersuche

Online dating should be an extension to how you normally meet the opposite sex. That said, it's the only way to flirt 24/7! Find city singles who work near you on online dating site http://www.lovestruck.com

If Flirting online then I suggest you try www.jaydiocity.co.uk This site is by far the best site for chatting with the opposite sex.

Online dating is an interesting way to meet singles and like you mentioned has sure become popular over the years.

Post a comment