Привет!
Мы студенты из Стэнфордского Университета в США и мы очень рады иметь возможность с вами общаться!
Hello, students from Khavaborsk and Oerebro!

This is Chris, Melissa, and Simon and we’re from Chicago, Los Angeles, and South Korea respectively. We are all sophomores at Stanford University! Chris is an economics major who likes to breakdance on his spare time. Melissa is pre-law and likes to play tennis! (And penguins!!) Simon is a materials science and engineering major and he likes to play soccer.
We would like to share with you a bit about Stanford culture. Stanford is a very liberal college and people feel very free to just talk to strangers on campus. Stanford has a wide-range of student groups, such as fraternities, minority groups, and pre-professional clubs. Because Stanford is a private institution and is smaller than public universities, there is a greater amount of interaction between students in classes and in extracurricular activities. Stanford is also a community devoted to service related activities, and so we have a lot of students interested in volunteer and non-profit groups.
Christophe:
What are the first words you think of when you hear the name “Bill Gates?” For the overwhelming majority, the words “rich,” “wealthy,” and “genius” come to mind. At the same time, philanthropic foundations in the United States are known for being wasteful and ineffective. For my research project I explored the context and strategy of the rhetoric of Bill Gates in regards to his recent work from the Gates Foundation. How does Bill Gates’ use his almost mythical success as an entrepreneur and his newfound identity as “the next Carnegie” to build partnerships in the world of philanthropy and export his vision of using business approaches to philanthropy? In exploring this thesis, I contrasted Andrew Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth” and Bill Gates’ first “Annual letter from the Foundation.” This gave me real insight into using different styles of speech (high vs. middle) and how to collaborate with people who may have large egos (other billionaires). It also allowed me to partially construct Bill Gates’ personality and his extreme acuteness when dealing with people and building partnerships.
My research ends on an optimistic note, urging private citizens to take note that philanthropic foundations should be accountable to the tax-paying body. This paper has led me to be very interested in the multi-billion dollar industry of private philanthropy, and I have high hopes that Bill Gates can use his ethos to urge many of his fellow foundation heads to take responsibility for their effectiveness, or lack thereof.
Melissa:
First of all, I think one of the most important things I’ve taken away from taking this amazing rhetoric of leadership class is the preparation that goes into giving an effective presentation. Before I didn’t realize that transforming a research paper into a speech/presentation takes a lot of work and creative energy! My research paper discussed changes in feminist rhetoric through time, specifically exploring the rhetoric used by Gloria Steinem and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. I found that the reason Stanton’s speeches still remain so powerful today is she uses the basic philosophical idea of individualism that appeals to a universal audience and transcends time. On the contrary, I found that Steinem had generalizations and logical fallacies in her speeches that weakened the power of her rhetoric. Thus, I feel that feminists today should learn by Stanton’s example and promote gender equality by using rhetoric that has a universal appeal and includes men, instead of alienating them.
I would love to hear you thoughts on my research and would be happy to answer any questions you have! =)
Simon:
There is only one nation on earth where you can still see the living examples of the Cold War. Ever since 1950, the Korean peninsula has been in war, and to this day it still remains to be divided.
My research on presidential rhetoric for Korean unification came to a conclusion that the rhetoric despite its long history over half a century has actually not changed ever since the beginning of separation. The ‘one-people, one-nation’ argument has been the impetus for the unification rhetoric, and I found its limitations in different historical cases of presidential rhetoric. Former President Kim Dae-jung, a Nobel Peace Prize laureate for his efforts of promoting democracy and reconciliation with North Korea, employed rhetoric of democracy and freedom in East Asia, and my conclusion supports his rhetoric with more global and universal basis for the fundamental argument of unification.
At the end, what I realized was that it is no longer an issue only concerning Korea but the whole world. I hope to see the two Korea’s united and come together finally through global communities support and love for peace.
Continue reading "Cross Cultural Leadership Rhetoric- Chris, Mel, Simon" »