At the dawn of the computer age, sixty years ago, the ENIAC had 18,000 vacuum tubes and consumed 160,000W. In 1997, Penn students shrunk the ENIAC down to a 40mm^2
silicon chip that consumed 10W. Despite such remarkable progress, duplicating the brainís performance remains elusive. The brain uses 10W to perform 10^16 synaptic events per second (ten petaops), whereas a state-of-the-art computer uses 100W to perform 10^9 instructions per second (one gigaop). At this rate, a computer as powerful as the brain would burn 10^9W. One gigawatt!
Profligate power consumption makes it impractical
to build an artificial brain or to replace damaged neural tissue with
electronic prostheses.
Is silicon technology grossly inferior or are existing designs simply wasteful? Computers use transistors, while brains compute with ion channels. Electrons move through a crystal a million times faster than ions move through a liquid when driven by the same electric field. Consequently, transistors switch 25,000 times faster despite their longer channel length. But they consume 50 times more energy