|
Scientists have used an
optical trap to track the movement of RNA
polymerase (RNAP), showing that the enzyme appears
to shift along DNA one base pair at a time.
Although many experts had expected this
conclusion, the report, appearing in this week's
Nature, reports the motion at a scale ten
times finer than previous work, allowing the
researchers to directly resolve the individual
steps. This angstrom-scale resolution could shed
light on less-understood aspects of gene
transcription and its regulation, as well as on
the tiny motions of other enzymes as they perform
their chemical tasks.
The researchers, led by
Steven Block of Stanford University, Ca., improved
the stability of their optical trap so that it
could resolve single-base-pair steps of E.
coli RNAP in solution. In this way they were
able to recognize and eliminate occasional pauses
and backtracking, isolating the "bare" elongation
rate. They confirmed that the progressive
step-by-step movement of RNAP occurs because
binding of a new ribonucleoside triphosphate (NTP)
unit locks in forward movements as the enzyme
jiggles back and forth along the DNA, in what is
called a 'brownian ratchet.'
"This paper does the best
job so far of providing evidence for the brownian
ratchet mechanism," said Rui Sousa of the
University of Texas Health Center in San Antonio,
one of the people who proposed the mechanism in
1997. Sousa, who was not involved the study,
called the new experiment a "real technical tour
de force."
"This is the most precise
measurement made on a single protein in an aqueous
buffer," Block told The Scientist. To
achieve this stability, the team operated a
two-trap apparatus in helium gas to reduce laser
deflections due to air motion. One trap held a
polystyrene bead attached to the growing RNA
strand. The other held a bead attached to the
double-stranded DNA being transcribed. The
researchers either assisted or retarded the RNAP
motion using a new technique to position one bead
near the edge of the trap to apply a constant
force, avoiding slow and complicated external
feedback.
Even so, there was
significant variation in the bead position with
time. Block emphasized that this noise is not
added by the instrument or the bead, but reflects
the normal motion of the molecules. "Any
transcription that takes place in an organism…is
taking place in an intrinsically noisy environment
in which all the components … are jiggling around
like crazy." Still, the researchers could see the
RNAP move in steps that averaged 3.7± 0.6Ĺ during
elongation, consistent with the distance between
single DNA base pairs. Nonetheless, Block said
that other phases of the transcription process --
for example, its initiation -- may well involve a
more complicated process in which the enzyme moves
a larger distance.
To model the bare
elongation rate as they varied the force and NTP
concentration, the researchers included a second
NTP binding site into the brownian ratchet model,
as suggested by recent structural analyses. Future
research may further investigate the pausing,
backtracking, and editing that ensure accurate
transcription, as well as details of how DNA
sequence modifies the elongation rate. In
addition, Block said that in principle the
instrument could now resolve the mechanical
motions that accompany the chemical activity of
many other enzymes.
Thomas Steitz of Yale
University in New Haven, Connecticut, said the
paper "looks like it's correct" for E. coli
RNAP, which is homologous to the primary nuclear
RNAP in all branches of life. But Steitz, who was
not involved in the study, cautioned that the
simpler RNAP from T7 bacteriophage, may harness
chemical energy directly for motion, despite
results from recent optical trap experiments that
support the brownian ratchet model.
References
| 1. |
|
[http://www.nature.com/]
|
| |
|
EA Abbondanzieri, WJ
Greenleaf, JW Shaevitz, R Landick, and SM
Block," Direct observation of base-pair stepping
by RNA polymerase," Nature, November 13,
2005. Return to citation in text: [1]
|
| |
| 2. |
|
[http://www.stanford.edu/group/blocklab/]
|
| |
|
Steve Block Return
to citation in text: [1]
|
| |
| 3. |
|
[http://www.the-scientist.com/news/20050128/01]
|
| |
|
C.Q. Choi, "How RNA
polymerase moves," The Scientist, January
28, 2005. Return to citation in text: [1]
|
| |
| 4. |
|
[http://www.uthscsa.edu/faculty/sousa.html]
|
| |
|
Rui Sousa Return to
citation in text: [1]
|
| |
| 5. |
|
[http://prl.aps.org/]
|
| |
|
WJ Greenleaf, MT
Woodside, EA Abbondanzieri, and SM Block,
"Passive All-Optical Force Clamp for
High-Resolution Laser Trapping," Phys. Rev.
Lett. November 11, 2005. Return to
citation in text: [1]
|
| |
| 6. |
|
[http://www.the-scientist.com/2005/6/20/26/1]
|
| |
|
K. Heyman, "Building a
better optical trap," The Scientist, June
20, 2005. Return to citation in text: [1]
|
| |
| 7. |
|
[http://www.csb.yale.edu/people/steitz/steitz_people.html]
|
| |
|
Tom Steitz Return to
citation in text: [1]
|
| |
| 8. |
|
[http://prl.aps.org/]
|
| |
|
P Thomen, PJ Lopez, and
F Heslot, "Unravelling the Mechanism of
RNA-Polymerase Forward Motion by Using
Mechanical Force," Phys. Rev. Lett. April
1, 2005. Return to citation in text: [1]
|
| | |