| Curriculum |
|
ABET's interpretation of Design |
|
Availability of Good BME Design Case Studies |
|
Breadth vs Depth |
|
Conflicts between industrial design project time limits
and academic schedule |
|
Constructing course to be offered for the first time in 2006 |
|
Coping with the huge breadth of the field |
|
Course design relevant to student interests |
|
Defining "design" for interdisciplinary projects |
|
Defining "design" in a biomedical environment |
|
Devoting sufficient contact hours and instruction specifically
to design in a curriculum filled with other coursework |
|
How to incorporate design throughout curriculum |
|
Integration of design throughout the curriculum |
|
Keeping the student workload reasonable (preventing
project expansion) |
|
Lack of consensus on what should be taught in different
design courses |
|
Providing more tissue-engineering/biologically oriented
design course |
|
Seniors are ill-prepared since no design experience
is offered earlier in our curriculum. |
|
Sufficient time among faculty |
|
Sufficient time in the curriculum |
|
Synthesizing and Balancing Training in Design and Innovation
with Research in BME |
|
Teaching top-down formal design to students who may
not know what design choices are available to them. |
|
Time constraints (1 semester is not enough) |
| Funding |
|
Adequate monetary support |
|
Budgetary constraints |
|
Difficulty getting technical advisors (and often funding)
for projects sponsored by clinicians or other non-engineers |
|
Financial Support |
|
Finding funding that will allow high quality designs |
|
Finding the necessary resources and support |
|
Funding for projects |
|
Industrial funding |
|
limited financial resources |
|
Obtaining funding for prototyping materials and custom
components |
|
|
| Industry involvement |
|
Developing and sustaining good corporate partnerships. |
|
Developing effective industry partnerships |
|
Difficulty getting technical advisors (and often funding)
for projects sponsored by clinicians or other non-engineers |
|
Establishing external collaborations appropriate to
students |
|
Experienced design mentors |
|
Identifying/recruiting external mentors for projects |
|
Industrial funding |
|
Industry involvement |
|
Resolution of IP concerns from industrial sponsors
providing real projects for our Masters of Engineering (M Eng.)
Program |
|
Sponsors |
|
Support from industry |
| Facilities/Resources |
|
Available lab space |
|
Collaboration between engineering and medical disciplines |
|
Dedicated Resources and Facilities |
|
Finding adequate space for all projects |
|
Finding good resources on industrial standards |
|
Finding good resources to teach the FDA process |
|
Finding needed equipment and protocol approval |
|
HIPAA impact on patient interface |
|
How much involvement from other engineering disciplines? |
|
Laboratory facilities |
|
limited staffing resources |
|
Obtaining good office and lab space for M Eng. students |
|
Prototyping facilities |
| Project Selection |
|
Appropriate designs for freshman level design course. |
|
Balanced projects that span the broad range of BME |
|
Choosing projects that can be completed in two semesters |
|
Coming up with meaningful projects that are interesting
and feasible |
|
Consistent project quality |
|
Creating an effectitve, truly multi-disciplinary design
project/experience |
|
Developing a format for team design projects |
|
Distribution of workload for managing of projects |
|
finding meaningful projects with sufficient support |
|
Finding mechanisms for follow-through on the best projects |
|
Finding projects that can be difficult but completed
in one year |
|
Funding for projects with substantial COTS components. |
|
Funding of projects |
|
Good projects |
|
Identifying projects that are design appropriate (not
research), doable in the time frame, and are attractive to the students. |
|
Identifying realistic clinically-relevant projects |
|
Incorporating design into senior projects with significant
research emphasis |
|
Interesting and practical BME type problems |
|
Interesting and suitable projects |
|
Projects with significant biological component |
|
Providing Enough company-sponsored design projects
that are uniformly well planned and suitable for senior students |
|
Recruitment of novel projects from the Medical colleagues |
| Intellectual Property |
|
Intellectual Property Issues |
|
Lack of a clear intellectual property policy |
|
Resolution of IP concerns from industrial sponsors
providing real projects for our Masters of Engineering (M Eng.)
Program |
|
Who owns IP of industry problems |
| Faculty |
|
|
Advisor Participation |
|
Convincing faculty that design is important |
|
Faculty and staff experience in design |
|
Faculty interest |
|
Making faculty aware of non-technical design constraints |
|
Resources for faculty with limited industry experience |
|
Sufficient time among faculty |
| Students |
|
Capturing the creativity of students |
|
Consistent project quality |
|
Creating good cross-functional teams. |
|
Cross discipline participation in senior design |
|
Increasing Undergraduate enrollments |
|
Insuring Individual Student Accountability in face
of Increasing # of BME Students |
|
Integrating efficient assessment practices |
|
NDA's for Students |
|
Rubric development for evaluation of team activities. |
|
Student level of interest |
|
Student Performance Evaluation Process |