|
Project
Participants
Biographies
Contact
|
About This Project
Inspired by the work of Walter Benjamin, Ernst Bloch, Gaston Bachelard,
Kevin Lynch, Michel de Certeau, Richard Sennett, Franco Moretti,
J. Hillis Miller, Sigrid Weigel, Karl Schlögel, and others,
"Berlin: Temporal Topographies" explores Berlin's
cultural histories using the technologies of new media. Bringing
together undergraduates, graduate students and academic scholars
of German Studies, Slavic languages, Comparative Literature, Jewish
Studies, History, Art history and Urban Studies, the participants
address aspects of Berlin's past, present and future through
"pathways" which lead the visitor through the city's
history as well as its contemporary culture and concerns. Transgressing
disciplinary boundaries and canonical approaches to history, the
pathways offer a variety of intersecting tracks that reveal the
temporal and topographical complexity of Berlin.
What are "Temporal Topographies"? First of all, the
concept refers to the inscription of time in space, the simultaneous
presence of different "time-layers," to use Reinhart
Koselleck's term "Zeitschichten,"; in a given place.
Take, for instance, Berlin's Wilhelmstrasse. For more than
seventy years, the street was the central axis of the Wilhelmine,
Weimar, and National Socialist states. In the course of Berlin's
destruction at the end of WWII, most of the street was turned into
rubble. Today, the history of Berlin from German Unification in
1871 to World War I, the Weimar Republic, and the Third Reich is
presented on transparent panels along the street. Looking through
the panels, one sees the present through the past as well as the
past through the present. Here, one actually experiences what Ernst
Bloch termed the "non-simultaneity of the simultaneous,"
that is, the presence and absence of the past in a given historical
place, at a given historical moment. Today, the haunting presence
of "grand history" is simultaneous with the banality
of drab GDR apartment buildings, bistros, and electronic shops.
The transparent panels are visual artifacts that enable the visitor
to experience the space's multilayered time. [For more information
on the project "Geschichtsmeile Wilhelmstraße" see
http://www.dhm.de/museen/wilhelmstr/]
Or take, for instance, the "advertising columns" commemorating
the Rosenstrasse-Protest in which "Aryan" women married
to Jewish men protested the arrest of their husbands. The memorial
is integrated into the everyday life of the city as a seemingly
ordinary advertising column. It thereby becomes an essential part
of the city's topography. [For more information on the site
and the Rosenstrasse protest visit http://www.topographie.de/e/rosen.htm
and http://fcit.coedu.usf.edu/holocaust/timeline/rosenstr.htm]
Berlin, as a historically-saturated city, is full of such sites:
The remains of the Wall, the ruins of the Anhalter Bahnhof, the
Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gedächtniskirche.
Like the transparent panels
on Wilhelmstrasse, the advertising column on Rosenstrasse, and the
traces of the former path of the Berlin Wall scarred across Friedrichstrasse,
our pathways enable a visitor to experience Berlin's multilayered,
historical topographies using new media. The pathways which compose
this project exhibit the multilayeredness of history inscribed in
actual topographies, while also exploring the significance of spatial
and temporal elements in works of literature and art: How do street
names, buildings, train stations, airports, gardens, and so forth
evoked in literary texts facilitate the production of meanings?
What kinds of images of the city emerge out of these literary constructions
of space? What is the relationship between the city's "body"
and metaphors of the city? How does the present topography of Alexanderplatz
relate to its past? How does Döblin's Berlin Alexanderplatz
reflect social, economic, political, and cultural phenomena
in the Berlin of the 1920s? How does our imagination of "Alexanderplatz"
inform the urban planning of this space today?
|