Administrative
Actions
Unlike other schools, Stanford is not a "zero tolerance"
campus. "Zero Tolerance"
means that no alcohol is tolerated on the many campuses that have
adopted this
policy, and students are suspended or even expelled for infractions.
Because
of the philosophical underpinnings of the Fundamental Standard,
Stanford’s first
approach is usually educational (see the full
policy). Perhaps it would be much
simpler if there was a formulaic response to alcohol infractions.
However, at
Stanford, each circumstance is evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
What are the factors that are considered in any alcohol infraction?
The extent
of the violation, past violations, and actions that are retaliatory
or dishonest are
considered. Actions that threaten the health, safety and well
being of self or
others, involve property damage, or flagrant disregard of the
law and University
policies are also taken into consideration. It is very serious
when alcohol is
an aggravating factor in violent and/or criminal behavior. (NOTE:
If the court
system may be involved, the University typically withholds investigation
and/or
administrative actions until the legal process has been completed).
What is the process?
In all situations, the first step is a complaint filed by an individual
or Unit, which
conducts an investigation, reviews the issue through a formal
fact-finding process.
In all cases, the University makes every effort to apply standards
of fairness and
consistency in the determination of administrative actions. Stanford
protects
individual students’ confidentiality and does not disclose
public information about
individual administrative sanctions. However, administrative actions
can and often
are made public when student groups are charged with a policy
violation.
Residential Education has the authority to review and take administrative
action if a
case involves an alcohol infraction that occurred in a campus
residence hall.
So, you know that when individuals or
student groups are found in violation of the alcohol policy, they
often face
disciplinary and other administrative actions. These processes
can take place with
or without a public safety citation or arrest.
Does it sometimes seem mysterious how some students lose their
housing for an
alcohol infraction, and others don’t? Wonder why one student
group is put on
probation, while another isn’t for similar circumstances?
Here is a behind-the-scenes attempt to explain the differences,
and demystify
what goes on behind the scenes.
How administrative actions regarding alcohol infractions
are determined:
The bottom line: Just as Stanford Police have
the duty to enforce
State and Federal law by education, citation and arrest, the University
has the duty
to enforce it's policies by administrative actions (educational
and/or disciplinary)
and sanctions.
When I was a Freshman I had this notion that
I couldn’t be arrested on campus
for alcohol. I'm not sure why I thought this,
but I did. I guess I must have heard
it from others. Well, I learned the truth
the hard way. One night I walked to
a party with a cup full of rum and coke and
got stopped by the police. They
asked me how old I was and to see my ID. The
officer cited me for Minor in Possession.
Residential Education
The Behavioral Expectations/Contracts for students can be found
in:
- Residential Agreement
- Policy On Controlled Substances and Alcohol
- Fundamental Standard
Possible Administrative Actions for Violations:
- Meet individually with RD
- Parents can be called
- Required attendance in the Vaden Alcohol Education Seminar
- Referred to Counseling and Psychological Services
- Placed on Housing Probation
- Removed from Housing
What typically happens when a student is found in violation
of law or policy?
First, the RD meets with the student. Depending on circumstances,
the student
might be referred to a mandatory Alcohol Education Seminar; might
be considered
for administrative actions; and/or might be referred for further
evaluation,
counseling and/or treatment. Let’s take a look at some hypothetical
scenarios.
First offense which caused no imminent harm (or threat
of harm) to self,
others or property
SITUATION A: Chris got busted for his first alcohol
offense (Minor In Possession)
on campus. A day or so later he got called in to see his Residence
Dean. The RD
was cool and discussed things over with Chris. Chris was clearly
reminded that the
offense was a breach of his Residence Agreement, as well as the
University Policy
on Controlled Substances and Alcohol. The RD then referred Chris
to the Stanford
Alcohol Education Seminar at Vaden. Chris first met with the Alcohol
Educator,
who interviewed Chris and enrolled him in a 3-hour education seminar
with other
students in similar circumstances. After successful completion
of the seminar,
Chris would be off the hook with the University unless he messes
up again. Chris
would still need to pay any incurred legal infraction and court
fees.
SITUATION B: The same scenario occurred with
Lisa. Lisa met with her RD, and
then the Alcohol Educator. However, due to concerns about her
drinking patterns,
she was also referred to CAPS for a more in-depth evaluation.
She might attend AA meetings too.
- Individual students who are charged with Fundamental Standard
or
honor code violation may be referred to the Office of Judicial
Affairs.
- Student groups who are charged with an infraction go before
a panel
in the Organization Conduct Board.
- The Dean of Students reviews all Judicial Affairs Panel and
Organization Conduct Board findings for accuracy, consistency
and
appropriateness.
The Organization Conduct Board has criteria for
determining administrative
actions like alcohol probation or alcohol suspension. The criteria
includes:
- Seriousness of conduct in the incident(s)
- How the group managed the incident(s)
- Actions of the group since the incident(s) occurred
- Recent behavioral history of the group (typically a 3-year
period)
- Mitigating factors
The following information outlines behavioral expectations and
contracts within
each setting/unit and the possible course of action leading to
potential sanctions
for individuals and groups followed by examples of problematic
and egregious
behaviors witnessed at Stanford.
Individuals
Examples of Problematic Behaviors:
- Violence
- Assault
- Heavy Drinking Behavior
- Vandalism
- Theft
- Alcohol Citation and Arrest (Drunk in Public, MIP, DUI, etc.)
- Illegal Activity
Possible non-University imposed Consequences of Criminal Violations
include:
- Fine
- Community Service
- Required attendance in the Santa Clara County Alcohol
- Education Program
- Jail
Examples of Problematic Behaviors:
- Cited with a ticket
- MIP (Minor in Possession of Alcohol)
- Arrested and Detained
- DUI (Driving Under the Influence)
- Drunk in Public (DIP)
- Violence
- Resisting Arrest
Student groups and residences
- Examples of Problematic Behaviors:
- Failure to comply with University Party Planning Guidelines
- Hazing
- Service to Minors
- Violations of Alcohol Policy
- Any action that results in the threat of harm to self, others
or property
- Illegal Activity
- Fundamental Standard Violations
Voluntary Student Organizations (VSO) and Greek organizations
- The Behavioral Expectations/Contracts for students can be found
in:
- OSA Greek Guide (Greek only)
- OSA Guidelines (VSO only)
- Party Planning Guidelines
- Policy On Controlled Substances and Alcohol
FIRST OFFENSE, WHICH CAUSED HARM TO SELF, OTHERS or PROPERTY
Terry got busted for her first alcohol offense. He was drunk in
public, broke
several windows, and it is unclear whether he deliberately punched
another
student. His Residence Dean called him in and they reviewed the
allegations. They
discussed that his conduct not only was in violation of the Residence
Agreement,
the University Policy on Controlled Substances and Alcohol, but
also clearly the
Fundamental Standard and state battery laws.
Terry's parents can be called as well because it is an alochol-related incident.
Terry might be referred to the Alcohol Seminar, but it is likely
that further
administrative and/or legal action will follow (see next section).
He, of course, will
need to pay any incurred legal infraction and court fees.
After the first offense
Jenn meets again with an RD for a second MIP violation. She usually
will not
be given the option of repeating the Alcohol Seminar. Jenn will
more typically
be referred for further administrative actions, or for a medical/psychological
evaluation, and perhaps counseling and treatment.
Office of Judicial Affairs
The Behavioral Expectations/Contracts for students can be found
in:
• Policy On Controlled Substances and Alcohol
• Fundamental Standard
Possible Administrative Actions for Violations (after Judicial
Affairs formal process):
• Community Service
• Suspension
• Required attendance in the Vaden Alcohol Education Seminar
• Expulsion (requires approval of the Provost)
Department of Public Safety/Stanford Police
Students are expected to abide by the law. Laws related to alcohol
can be
found in:
• California Penal Code
Possible Administrative Actions for Violations (after
the Organization
Conduct Board formal process):
• Alcohol probation or suspension
• Party Probation or suspension
• Conduct probation
• Required alcohol education
• Suspension recognized group status (VSO only)
• Dissolution/Loss of University recognition (VSO only)
• Loss of Housing for Greek Organizations (Greek only)
• Dissolution/Charter revoked (Greek only)
• Reprimand
• Restitution
• Monetary fine
RESIDENCES (Houses, Dorms, Suites, etc.)
The Behavioral Expectations/Contracts for students can be found
in:
• Party Planning Guidelines
• Policy On Controlled Substances and Alcohol
Possible Administrative Actions for Violations:
• House Meeting with RD
• House Meeting with Director of Residential Education
• Placed on Party or Social Probation

© Stanford University Alcohol Advisory Board, 2008
|