PROFESSIONALISM IN CONTEMPORARY PRACTICE:

The Professionalism in Contemporary Practice (PCP) program was offered from 2003 to 2007. Each year six medical faculty were selected for training as seminar facilitators. The one-month, facilitator-training course provided participants with the background knowledge and seminar leadership skills needed to deliver a series of eight 90-minute seminars to faculty and residents.

CURRICULUM:

Updated Curricular Materials
for PCP trained facilitators only
password required

The curriculum covers key concepts and issues pertinent to 21st century medicine. The curriculum is geared for the physician-educatcor and consists of eight 90-minute modules covering the following topics:

 

Program Faculty: Clarence Braddock III, MD, MPH, Kambria M Hooper, MEd, Peter Rudd, MD, Merlynn Bergen, PhD, and program alumni.

 

List of Trained PCP Facilitators:

25 Institutions 30 Facilitators Program
Alameda County Medical Center, Oakland, CA Thaddeus Bordofsky PCP 04
Duke University, Durham, NC Sylvestre Quevedo PCP 07
Georgetown University, Washington, DC Eileen Moore PCP 05
Howard University, Washington, DC Jerome Herbers PCP 02
Kanazawa University Hospital, Ishikawa, JAPAN Hideki Nomura PCP 05
Kansai Medical University, Osaka, JAPAN Keiko Komoto PCP 07
Keio University, Tokyo, JAPAN Yohei Ohno PCP 07
Kettering Medical Center, Kettering, OH Stephen McDonald PCP 02
Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, THAILAND Srivieng Pairojkul PCP 07
Louisiana State University Health Sciences, Shreveport, LA Pat Bass, III PCP 05
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN John Bachman PCP 04
Mount Sinai Medical School, City University of New York, NY Helen Fernandez PCP 04
National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, TAIWAN Benjamin Kuo PCP 02
Northern Ontario Medical School, Sudbury,Ontario, CANADA Sarah Strasser PCP 04
Northwestern University, Chicago, IL Robert Golub PCP 02
North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY Erica Kreismann PCP 07
Stanford University, Stanford, CA Anne Dembitzer
Jon Fuller
Preetha Basaviah
Laura Meinke
PCP 02
PCP 04
PCP 06
PCP 06
Taipei Medical University, Taipei, TAIWAN Cliff Chiehfeng Chen PCP 05
Tohuko University, Sendai, JAPAN Yutaka Nagasaki PCP 06
Uniformed Services Univ. of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD Jeffrey Jackson PCP 02
University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL Stuart Cohen PCP 02
University of California, Davis, CA Sonia Sutherland PCP 02
University of California, San Diego, CA Timothy Dresselhaus
Simerjot Jassal
PCP 02
PCP 06
University of North Carolina, Carolinas Med Ctr, Charlotte, NC Wesley Hofferbert PCP 05
University of Oklahoma College of Medicine-Tulsa, Tulsa, OK Erik Wallace PCP 05
University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA Ellen Gordon PCP 02

Homesite Seminars:

During the first year following the training at Stanford, the facilitators return to their home institutions to conduct the seminars for medical teachers. As part of the evaluation of this train-the-trainer diffusion process, the facilitators are asked to play a critical role in gathering data during the post-training year. Evaluation activities include questionnaire administration, videotape recordings of seminars, and personal record keeping during the implementation of training.

The teaching of seminars in subsequent years is based on the size and need of individual home site institutions. Trained facilitators also serve as regional and national faculty development resources for instructional improvement.

Comments from SFDC-trained Professionalism in Contemporary Practice Facilitators:

"It was a treasured experience to see different teaching styles--ranging from didactic to interactive to freeform--and to consider the inherent value of each. Now the challenge is to experiment when I return home."

"Although I felt that my teaching skills were slightly above average before starting the program, I certainly learned many new teaching skills. What helped the most was doing something that I didn't feel comfortable doing· This will help me give better presentations in the future."

"The most significant attitudinal shift for me was the realization that my goal can be to practice medicine as it should be, incorporating the new, instead of to practice medicine as I was trained."

"I am glad to have learned skills for disclosing medical errors to patients and for assessing cultural characteristics of patients."

"This month has provided me with an armamentarium of skills for practicing and teaching in the various PCP content areas. Specifically, tools for beginning reflective practice, role-modeling, evidence-based medicine strategies such as the Process Improvement Combined ApprOach (PICO) format for questions and ideas for implementing Quality Improvement projects as practice-based learning and improvement for residents in clinic."

"Overall increase in knowledge, skills, and attitudes across PCP modules impressed me. I thought I would have preferences of some topics, but was pleasantly surprised to see interest broadly. The hands on experience with role plays and tremendous feedback helped me grow tremendously as a learner and teacher."

"The opportunity to take the material we have learned and actually teach the content--this forces us to learn the content in a very different way--at a much deeper level. Also being able to teach the material and work with it is a very empowering process. I am inspired by the "train the trainer" model."

"Most significant to me was the knowledge that others found these topics important to practice of medicine and to a careers in academic medicine; a feeling/belief I had been developing during my training but that others didn't seem to realize or legitimize. I now have the realization that this could make a huge impact on my career and the way in which I treat my patients and hopefully teach students/learners."

"My skepticism regarding whether professionalism can be taught has been replaced by self efficacy, in my ability to do so."

Comments from Faculty and Resident Participants in Home-Site Seminars:

"The components of true leadership in this course made a major difference for me as a clinician-educator."

"The overall impact that was most significant to me was being able to understand quality improvement and how it affects everyone."

"Team building and dialogue with others regarding patient care was the overall impact that was most significant to me."

"The seminar experience changed my understanding of professionalism; it is broader and entails much more than I used to think about professionalism."

"Making time to establish and incorporate evidence-based practice/clinical guidelines was the overall impact that was most significant to me."

"The impact of the PCP seminars on my practice is that I have been much more conscious about evidence-based medicine, practice-based learning and improvement, patient safety and quality improvement, as well as how to involve other faculty in that process. I have started to try to explicitly teach that to residents as part of my core curriculum when I am either in clinic or on the hospital service. Just examples, we've enacted 2 new protocols to try to improve our anti-coagulation and I think in part or completely [they] are related to participation through the seminars."


Last modified 06.25.2009