Global Landuse Activity and Emissions (Terrestrial Sequestration)

Report to EMF on landuse activity and emissions in stabilization modeling. This report presents and evaluates the role of land in climate stabilization scenarios. Specifically, we consider stabilization results from four of the EMF-21 study models, as well as some more recent stabilization results from two of the EMF-21 modeling teams. This report was designed, in large part, to simply provide data to inform a growing interest in understanding land’s role in climate change mitigation—by the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change, the land subgroup of the EMF-22 climate stabilization study, and a burgeoning global discussion on long-term mitigation potential of biofuels.

Report to EMF on landuse activity and emissions in stabilization modeling. Land in Stabilization - January 2007

International Sinks (Terrestrial Sequestration) Results for EMF 21

Below are results from the participating modeling teams in the sinks subgroup. Three modeling teams were able to produce results for the mitigation scenarios (see description below). There also are baseline sinks estimates from two other modeling teams.

 

There are two objectives for this sinks modeling exercise:

(1) Compare baseline and mitigation scenario estimates from among the participating models. The sinks modelers will present their results, including model comparisons, at the December 8-10 meeting.  

(2) Incorporate the sequestration supply curves into the economy, technology, or integrated assessment models for the study's priority scenarios.  We hope that many of the other modelers use this new data to evaluate the potential contribution from sinks.

 

Important: Unlike the non-CO2 data where there is one, common data set to use, there are three sinks mitigation results to select from different models.  We encourage modelers to review all three model results and select at least one that is most closely consistent with their own model parameters and assumptions.

 

 

Scenarios

 

The scenarios were developed and run in order to develop sequestration supply curves based on a set of carbon price scenarios that are derived from and attempt to stay close to the overall study's priority scenarios.  There are seven scenarios: one reference, baseline case (modeler's choice) and six mitigation cases as described below.

 

To be consistent with the Long-term modeling, a set of globally uniform carbon prices that start in 2010 and rise at specified discount rates through 2100.  The specified discount rates and starting prices are the following:

-        5% starting at $5/TCE and $10/TCE.  These resulting 2100 prices are $403 and $807, respectively.

-        3% starting at $10/TCE and $20/TCE. These resulting 2100 prices are $143 and $286, respectively.                                                   

That's four scenario runs.

           

A fifth scenario is a constant carbon price of $100/TCE through 2100.

 

And lastly, to be consistent with the short-term, Rate of temperature change target, one price scenario that starts at $75 in 2010, raises by $5 per year until 2050 when the price will be $275.  That's the sixth scenario.

 

The following Excel file illustrates the carbon prices for each of the scenarios.

Sinks Prices

 

Baseline and Mitigation Results

Ohio State Univ  (Brent Sohngen) & RFF (Roger Sedjo) with GTM             Sohngen Data

For background material on the model, see

Estimating Carbon Supply Curves for Global Forests and Other Land Uses

Roger Sedjo, Brent Sohngen, and Robert Mendelsohn | April 2001

http://www.rff.org/disc_papers/PDF_files/0119.pdf

 

From RIVM (Bas Eickhout, Detlef van Vuuren) with IMAGE                               Eickhout Data

            This also includes a background paper.

LBNL (Jayant Sathaye & Willy Makundi) and EPA (Ken Andrasko) with GCOMAP Makundi Data

            This also includes background paper.

Baseline Results

CIRAD (Daniel Deybe) with POLES/AGRIPOL                                      AIM & AGRIPOL

NIES (Junichi Fujino) with AIM

            [These two files are zipped together]

 

 

In each of the spreadsheets, the principal modeler is identified and their email is provided in case anyone has questions about the models and data.  Questions on the overall sinks subgroup should be directed to Francisco de la Chesnaye; email:  delachesnaye.francisco@epa.gov