Less-Commonly Taught Languages
in Selected Elementary and Secondary Schools in California

[Table 7] Correlation between the COCI and FLOSEM ratings
for Selected Case Study Students

(The number of students in the program is recorded in parentheses)

In the 1994-95 School Year:

School LevelLanguageCorrelation RSignificance
ElementaryJapaneseNANA
High School together
Japanese
Chinese
Korean
Russian
0.786 (180)
0.756 (84)
0.787 (35)
0.910 (27)
0.493 (34)
p < .0001
p < .0001
p < .0001
p < .0001
p < .005


In the 1995-96 School Year:

School LevelLanguageCorrelation RSignificance
ElementaryJapanese0.564 (55)p < .0001
High School together
Japanese
Chinese
Korean
Russian
0.826 (177)
0.666 (89)
0.709 (31)
0.934 (30)
0.748 (27)
p < .0001
p < .0001
p < .0001
p < .0001
p < .0001



Return to Chapter 4: Oral Proficiency Assessment Results


Cover Page and Directory
Table of Contents
Acknowledgement
Executive Summary
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Description of Evaluation Activities
Chapter 3: Portfolios as Assessment Devices
Chapter 4: Oral Proficiency Assessment Results
Chapter 5: Student and Parent Questionnaire Survey Results (Part A)
Chapter 5: Student and Parent Questionnaire Survey Results (Part B)
Chapter 6: Teacher and Administrator Perceptions of the Program
References
Appendices

Home | Organization | Map | Events and Discussions | Resources | Standards and Frameworks

© Copyright 1997 California Foreign Language Project. All rights reserved