Class of 2002

write a summary evaluation; recommend two ratings based on a five-point scale for academic achievement and extracurricular achievement, and another "plus," "neutral" or "minus" rating for the degree of "intellectual vitality."

Finally, the second reader recommends "admit," "deny" or "swim"; the last designation means deferring the decision for another round.The files are passed along to third readers and the same exercise is repeated.

Third readings are conducted by the five most senior admission staff who have the authority to make decisions. They also have the power to overrule previous recommendations, based on insight gained through experience.

During the regular reading process and, roughly, over any given week, second readers may recommend "admit" on no more than 12 percent of the files read, and "swim" on no more than 38 percent of the files. This means they must recommend "deny" on at least 50 percent of the files that have been determined to be in the top half of the applicant pool. The winnowing process continues until the admit pool is filled. At the end of this process, the dean and the associate dean sign off on all offers of admission.

In theory, this sounds simple. But the process exacts a heavy toll on readers, who must examine thousands of files apiece during the four-month selection process from November to April. The tough decisions admission officers face daily are best illustrated by an experiment former admission dean Jean Fetter tried in 1985.

Fetter invited 10 highly respected professors emeriti to join in the reading of applications. The seven who accepted were asked to read 100 files and to designate 20 to 25 percent as admits, 45 to 50 percent as denies and the remaining 35 percent as swims.

"They put closer to 80 percent in the swim category," says Fetter. "Even for faculty with significant experience in teaching Stanford students, it was enormously difficult to make distinctions within a random set of 100 applicants, most of whom seemed eminently qualified to be Stanford students."

Previous | Next


MARCH/APRIL 1998

 Contents

 NEWS & VIEWS
 President’s Column
 On Campus
 Arts & Sciences
 February Floods
 Kenneth Pitzer
 Campus Briefs

 Science & Medicine
 Computer Friendships
 Life on Mars
 Sci & Med Briefs

 Sports
 Women’s Volleyball
 Sports Briefs

 FEATURES
 Class of 2002
 Stanford Wildlife
 Learning Curve
 John Felstiner
 Aging in America
 Stanford Observed
 Hospital Merger


 HOME
 GUEST SERVICES
 SEARCHING
 ST COLLECTION
 NEWS SERVICE
 ALUMNI
 EMAIL THE EDITOR
 COMING UP