|
Gender Paradox
SPEAKING OF SEX
By Deborah Rhode
Is it a boy or a girl? This is usually the first question we ask at
the birth of a child. And the answer remains of crucial importance
throughout the childs life. In every known society, gender differences
structure human identity and social relationships. Yet biology by no
means dictates the form that those differences assume. The roles and
characteristics that we associate with males and females vary
considerably across time and culture. Still, one similarity remains
striking. As anthropologist Margaret Mead once noted, there are cultures
in which men weave and women fish, and ones in which women weave and men
fish.
But in either case, the work that women perform is valued less.
What accounts for both the variations and the
universalities in sex-linked differences? This is one of the central
paradoxes of gender. If biology does not explain the inequalities in
mens and womens social positions, why are those inequalities so
pervasive and persistent? Alternatively, if biology is the central force
in determining male and female identity, why do societies differ so
widely in the tasks and traits that are associated with each sex?
Over the past several decades, both the similarities
and variations in gender roles have become increasingly apparent. In the
West, womens opportunities and employment patterns have changed
considerably, but traditional gender stereotypes remain much the same.
Despite some variation across class, race, ethnicity and sexual
orientation, the characteristics that American and European societies
associate with men and women have changed little from the ones Aristotle
described more than two thousand years ago. Masculine traits still
include strength, courage, independence, competitiveness, ambition and
aggression. Feminine qualities still include emotional sensitivity,
patience, caution, nurturance, passivity and dependence. Men are taught
to place higher value on power, and women to place higher value on
interpersonal relationships.
|
|