Cultural Diversity

we’re going to turn to a more specific question ­ the ways that debate has affected, or should affect, the way American history is written and taught.

American history has been a crucial battleground in this debate. During the past 20 or 30 years, there has been growing attention on the part of American historians, and teachers of American history, to the story of previously neglected segments of the population. And this new direction of historical interest raises questions about how these uncovered stories unearthed from obscurity relate to the narrative of white male achievement that used to constitute the essence of our history.

George FredricksonGeorge Fredrickson

Is this one story with several subsidiary themes, subplots, or is it several narratives of equal significance? If the latter is true, is any synthesis possible?

ALBERT CAMARILLO   I want to comment first on the core issue that Professor Schlesinger raised yesterday in his talk about the oftentimes intense debate between what he calls the “monocultural ideologues“ and the “multicultural ideologues.”

You have to understand that the debate arises out of nearly 25 years of changes in the historical profession ­ the way we write history, the topics that we’ve identified for analysis and interpretation.

The new histories, the new Western history; the so-called ethnic histories ­ African American history, Chicano history, Asian American history ­ all these are relatively new in the academy.

Previous | Next


JULY/AUGUST1996

 In This Issue

 DEPARTMENTS
 President’s Column

 NEWS
 On Campus
 Teaching & Research
 MacArthur Grants
 105th Commencement
 Campus Digest

 Sci & Med
 George Somero
 New Hopkins Bldg
 Waterman Award
 Sci & Med Digest

 Sports
 Soccer Grows Up
 Sports Digest

 FEATURES
 Mae Jemison
 Nancy Packer

 Essay
 A Baboon’s Life

 Forum
 Cultural Diversity


 HOME
 GUEST SERVICES
 SEARCHING
 ST COLLECTION
 NEWS SERVICE
 ALUMNI
 EMAIL THE EDITOR
 COMING UP