|
Prominent Authors
Prominent Authors on the Creative Writing Program
BLANCHE McCRARY BOYD
Stegner Fellow 1967-68
AUTHOR OF THE NOVELS NERVES
MOURNING THE DEATH OF MAGIC
and REVOLUTION OF LITTLE GIRLS
Being a Stegner Fellow was the formative event of my development as a writer.
From Wallace Stegner I discovered that the difference between being talented and
being good was the most difficult inch I would ever attempt to cross.
KEN KESEY
Ford Fellow 1959-60
THE AUTHOR OF ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOOS
NEST AND THREE OTHER NOVELS. KESEY IS NOW AT WORK ON A VIDEO MUSICAL,
TWISTER
I always compared Stegner to Vince Lombardi - he put together not only a good
team but a good team of supporting coaches. Dick Scowcroft was so sweet and
gentle that he complemented Malcolm Cowley, who was a gruff man. Cowley taught us
something that we carried into our lives: Its just as hard to write a bad novel
as a good one. Also, you dont want to hurt your teammates. Good writing
glorifies all writers.
DEAN CRAWFORD
Mirrielees Fellow 1974-75
AUTHOR OF THE LAY OF THE LAND
Nancy Packer and John LHeureux taught the importance of being as good an
observer, witness and lens as one could be; and even now, when I falter in my
objectification or let my language slur into murkiness, I see Nancys and Johns
faces, the first preaching clarity as a religion, the second as art.
SCOTT TUROW
Mirrielees Fellow 1970-72
Jones Lecturer 1972-75
AUTHOR OF FOUR BOOKS, INCLUDING
THE BURDEN OF PROOF and PLEADING
GUILTY
I fell into a community of younger people who had the same ambitions I did,
who were gripped by talent and desire, who thought obsessively, as I did, about
the contours of a good sentence and the enduring mystery of what could be said in
fiction.
Those years - 1970-75 - were crazy times. There was a lot of erratic conduct:
too much intoxication, too many marriages casually destroyed, too many people who
laid waste to their talent and, even, their lives in the mistaken belief that
they were being appropriately romantic and literary.
But I would do it all again. I am whatever I am as a writer because I was at
Stanford then.
JAMES D. HOUSTON
Stegner Fellow 1966-67
AUTHOR OF SEVERAL NOVELS INCLUDING CONTINENTAL DRIFT,
AND WORKS OF
NON-FICTION, INCLUDING
CALIFORNIANS: SEARCHING FOR THE GOLDEN STATE and
THE MEN IN MY LIFE
The example Wally Stegner set as a working writer, his disciplined approach,
his steadfast dedication to the craft and art, perceiving it not only as daily
work but as his lifes work, was the most significant thing I learned. It was my
first exposure to that level of sustained professionalism.
In both fiction and non-fiction, Stegner left a legacy of his profound belief
in history, being honest about the ways the past shapes and illuminates the
present, whether it be a familys past or a rivers or a regions.
Hand in hand with that was his sense of place, the ongoing dialogue between
individuals and the places we inhabit. His region was the American West, where he
had a groundwire that ran deep; and in that grounding he found his strength as a
storyteller.
HARRIET DOERR
Stegner Fellow 1980-81
AUTHOR OF STONES FOR IBARRA
CONSIDER THIS, SEÑORA
and
THE TIGER IN THE GRASS: STORIES AND OTHER INVENTIONS
I will always be thankful to Stanford for taking me back in my old age. It was
a wonderful present, being given that experience.
Everyone else was in their late 20s. It was much easier for me to write
knowing that whatever you wrote was going to be looked at critically. And no
matter what their comments were, you knew you would get something out of it.
If I hadnt gone to the program, I probably wouldnt have tried to write
seriously. I doubt I would have gone on with it, because I would not have had
enough faith in myself.
THOMAS SIMMONS
Stegner Fellow in Poetry 1978-79
BOOKS INCLUDE
THE UNSEEN SHORE: MEMORIES OF A CHRISTIAN SCIENCE CHILDHOOD
and EROTIC RECKONINGS: MASTERY AND APPRENTICESHIP IN THE WORK OF
POETS AND
LOVERS
We happily invaded each others houses (or tenements or one-room apartments
above garages) with poems and food and wine, to read each others work
attentively and critically, wanting it to be the best it could be; we wanted each
other to thrive.
It is not merely my aging memory that reconstructs it as a luminous time. Much
of this quality of light had to do with the young writers there.
But the light also came from Kenneth Fields, possibly the most underrated poet
of our time and a fabulous workshop leader. He was, to me - to most of us, I
think, that year - something of a guru, a Buddha-man with a Buddha-belly and
room-filling laugh, a man who could joyously zing home a complex point so youd
never forget it. There was no one like him. He could analyze the strengths and
weaknesses of a poem with a fierce patience and compassion. Then, at an
unexpected moment, he could bring in something perfectly germane from Aristotle
or Etienne Gilson or Emile Chartier or Emily Dickinson or Robert Lowell or any of
a vast number of sources he kept in his mind like a Rolodex of true friends.
With Ken, poetry became for me what Id always hoped it would be: an article
of faith, a way of shoring up my own collapsing confidence in the worth of the
world, a way, finally, of seeing.
JUDITH RASCOE
Stegner Fellow 1969-70
SCREENPLAYS INCLUDE
PORTRAIT OF THE ARTIST AS A YOUNG MAN
EAT A BOWL
OF TEA
and HAVANA
I got serious, profoundly attentive, responsive criticism of my work from
other writers - not critics, but writers who are also darn good readers and who
had no other agenda but to read and respond and say This is working or I think
this isnt.
If you go back to the 60s (my undergraduate years) there was still a sense
that all the literary action was in New York. (Maybe also in Boston, or the Deep
South.) There was a sense that we were out in the provinces, in the toolies. One
of the things Stegner did was give the people in the program a sense of
connection, that they were part of the whole literary landscape - that we werent
out on the fringe, part of this comical California as envisioned by eastern
writers. We were apprentices at this profession that was nationwide. Maybe he
didnt develop the regionalist school he had hoped for, but he did encourage a
lot of writers.
ROBERT PINSKY
Stegner Fellow 1962-65
BOOKS INCLUDE
THE INFERNO OF DANTE: A NEW VERSE TRANSLATION
and the just-published THE FIGURED WHEEL: NEW AND COLLECTED POEMS
Stegners vision was very characteristic of a period when it was assumed that
literary art was important to the life of the university. In his heyday, the
prestige and importance of writing in universities was unquestioned. Art had a
value in that time. In previous decades and subsequent ones to that time,
academics have tended to be insular, pedantic, cautious, and in their attitude
toward art either uncomprehending and intimidated or uncomprehending and
condescending.
|