Table of Contents:
Before You Leave
Human Subjects
The main page for non-medical research applications is
http://humansubjects.stanford.edu/nonmedical/
-- Many linguistic projects are automatically exempt from Human Subjects
review, however chances are that most projects conducted in the field will
need to go through the Human Subjects process. It's probably safe to
assume that you need to apply for Human Subjects approval!!!
-- Plan on submitting your application to the Institutional Review
Board (IRB) about two months before you plan to start using human
subjects, just to be safe!!!
-- Submit your application electronically, at the link provided above.
-- When you're back, don't forget to renew your status every calendar
year from the time you first applied!!!
Background Research
Needless to say it is important, before you leave, to inform yourself
of
the culture and the history of the speakers you will be working with, and
of the current political situation of the area you will be in etc. Not
only will these factors bear upon the nature of the language you are
studying, but a good knowledge of the socio-cultural norms and the local
political climate will facilitate good relations with the people you are
working with, and will help you avoid stepping on people's toes and
thereby jeopardizing your position in the community.
On the linguistic side, it again goes without saying that you should
have
studied all available literature on the language itself before embarking
on your own field trip. It also helps to have some knowledge of related
languages (especially if you particular language is very underdescribed),
and, especially in the case of isolates, of the other languages in the
region. If you are interested in a particular aspect of the language in
question, then it pays to work out very carefully what sort of data you
are looking for, prior to leaving, and design the best means of eliciting
this, in order to capitalize on your time in the field. See our section on
links to downloadable questionnaires and surveys.
Making
Contacts
You should make contact with any linguists who have recently worked in
the
area to which you are headed. This is useful for logistical matters
relating to preparing yourself for the stay, and also in order to set up
relations that may be beneficial to all of you later on, in terms of
sharing materials and data. It's also a good idea to make contact with
any local universities, research institutes and local linguists before you
leave, and essential to set up good relations with these groups when you
actually reach your destination. This way you can become familiar with
ongoing research in your field, and set up valuable communication channels
which help to secure ongoing progress in the field.
What to take
Gifts
It is a good idea to come prepared with gifts for local universities
(linguistics books, e.g by linguists connected with your university are
always a good choice), community authorities, your informants and any
nearby children. Again, talking to people who have recently been in the
area, or are still there, is a good way to determine what is
appropriate.
Officialdom
You will generally have to deal with officials at the regional and
local
level to obtain research clearance. Navigating authorities can be
facilitated by bringing with you letters from your university on official
letterheads. Stickerbooks or business cards with the official university
logo are also a good idea.
Audio Recording Equipment
Some general tips
Always have a backup system in case your primary system fails. The best
choice is a professional quality analog cassette recorder, with
adjustable recording volume.
Make sure you thoroughly check and clean your recording equipment prior
to your field work.
Take spare batteries.
At the beginning of each elicitation session, test to see that the
equipment is recording properly.
In choosing your recording equipment you need to weigh up the relative
convenience, accuracy and price of the various available devices. Here are
some of the standard options. See the links below for more detailed
information and advice.
DAT
DAT recorders offer better quality recording than mini disk recorders,
but
are more expensive, more easily broken and don't perform well in extreme
climates. It can be difficult to obtain the DAT tapes. These tapes do not
preserve well long term, so if you do choose a DAT device, be sure to
transfer the data to a hard drive, CD or DVD regularly.
Minidisks
Many minidisk recorders compress the sound as soon as they record,
which
results in the instant loss of some of the signal, which obviously isn't
ideal if you intend to do acoustic analysis.The newest Sony Hi-MD minidisk
recorders do, however, record uncompressed WAV sound data, and some
machines record sound direct to CD. Minidisk recorders have the advantage
of being small and convenient and are much cheaper than DAT recorders. The
minidisks themselves do not preserve well long term, so again, be sure to
transfer the data regularly to a more dependable location.
Hard disk recorders
It is now possible to find small USB devices (with quality microphone
pre-amps, 24-bit A/D converters, 106 dB dynamic range), which can be used
with most PC and Macintosh machines. Recordings obtained with these
devices are apparently excellent (see
http://www.historicalvoices.org/oralhistory/hdd-rec.html
for more
information and photos), and are probably not a bad choice if you are in a
situation where recording from a laptop is possible.
PC card and CD-R recorders
Marantz has a trustworthy selection of professional quality PC card
filed
recorders. They record uncompressed PCM 16-bit audio at a sample rate of
44,100 Hz. The data is stored as a Wav audio file. The PC cards are,
unfortunately, very expensive however. There is now a new Marantz portable
CD recorder on the market, which writes data directly to a CD-R or CD-RW,
and looks promising ( see, for example
http://www.proaudiosuperstore.com/Marantz-CDR300.html)
Analog Recorders
These are still popular as a primary recording device, and are ideal as
a
back-up option. Make sure the recorder you choose has a high
signal-to-noise and a broad frequency ratio, variable speed playback,
automatic shutoff, adjustable volume, and that it is both electric and
battery operated. Analog tapes are reasonably durable, especially if you
use chrome tape, which stretches less than polyester tape. Tapes will, of
course, later need to be digitized if you intend to create archivable
files, or for acoustic analysis.
I-Pods
The word on I-Pods seems to be that (currently at least) they are not
the
best choice for high quality recording in the field. A discussion of their
failings and merits can be found at:
http://lists.topica.com/lists/phonetics/read/message.html?mid=810319999&sort=d&start=587
Microphones
It is very important to have a high quality external microphone with a
good signal-to-noise ration. Internal microphones pick up machine noise so
avoid these.
For further information on recording devices, try the following:
http://www.historicalvoices.org/oralhistory/audio-tech.html
http://linguistlist.org/issues/14/14-720.html
http://www.paradisec.org.au/Audio_Links.htm
http://bartus.org/contents/
Video Recording
Adding the element of video to your fieldwork can mean a new wealth of
data, but it also requires some additional considerations. A good summary
of the issues surrounding video recording can be found at the "How to Film
in the Field" page at emeld.org.
Links
http://www.stanford.edu/~popolvuh/field-checklist.htm
This is the most comprehensive website we've seen so far on tips on
what to pack when planning any kind of Linguistic Anthropological
Fieldwork. Stanford Professor Jim Fox has covered every potential and
necessary packing item you could think of! You
won't need everything he lists, but his checklist is sure to keep you from
forgetting something possibly crucial to your fieldwork.
Travel Preparation: International
Passports
- Apply early for a U.S. Passport, if you don't have one already.
- Here
is the official Department of State website on Passports.
- There are also independent sites, such as this.
Visas
- Apply early for the visa(s) to your country of study.
- Here is the
official Department of State website on Visas.
- You may need to send your passport to D.C. for a while!
Immunizations
- Some fieldwork locations has a high risk of disease.
- The best place to begin getting information and starting the vaccination
process is your campus health center.
- The Vaden Travel Clinic site is http://vaden.stanford.edu/medical_services/travel_clinic.html.
- Here is the
official CDC website on International Travel.
Government travel warnings
- Stay updated on official travel warnings!!!
- Check the official U.S. Department of State website on travel: http://travel.state.gov/.
Travel Preparation: Domestic
Immunizations
- Some regions of the U.S. do recommend particular vaccinations.
- Check your campus health center!
When You're There
Conducting Fieldwork
Consultants
As Dimmendaal notes in his contribution to Newman and Ratliffe's
Linguistic Fieldwork, it is very important that you remain in control of
choosing your informants, and that you don't necessarily follow
"suggestions" that officials may make as to suitable informants. It is
always best, where possible, to have more than one consultant, preferably
they should be of different ages and sexes. Try to find consultants who
have good intuitions about their language, and who like talking about
it.
Payment
Follow cultural norms with regard to whether it is appropriate and how
much to pay your consultant. If there happen to be other linguists in the
area, it's a good idea to consult them as to standard rates. In any
case, be sure to have some idea of what is an acceptable level of payment
for the community in which you are working. Paying too much can be as
problematic as not paying enough. When direct payment is inappropriate,
there are usually other methods of renumeration possible.
Always get receipts for payment, as this looks more official. If you
arrange to pay your consultant at a regular time (e.g each week), this can
reduce misunderstandings.
Elicitation techniques
First Steps
(Preliminary Information and Steps 1-3 were compiled by Barb Kelly,
Spring, 2004)
Preliminary information needed from your consultant/informant
Name
Date of birth
Place of birth
Places lived; for how long
Languages spoken (written/read/understood
Education
Profession, if any
Family background (mother/father/sisters/brothers - languages they speak)
Eliciting and Transcribing data
Recording issues:
Transcribing
- you control the recording equipment
- have the consultant listen to a short portion slowly and repeat every
syllable
- transcribe a stretch and then get a translation
- feel free to ask for meanings of particular words as you go
- do as much glossing as possible as you go along
Sentences/words missed
- look up words in class lexicon
- make notes on what you think is going on and things to check
- it's life that some parts may be too difficult to understand (even for
the speaker! learn to move on.)
Things to check when transcribing
1. PHONOLOGY
Consonants
- place, manner
- voicing
- breathy/creaky voice
- ejective
- implosive
- nasalization
Vowels
- height
- backness
- rounding
- nasalization
- voicelessness
- breathy/creaky articulation
Pitch
- tone?
- distinct pitch patterns?
- beware of "list intonation", skewing of elicitation context
Stress
- prominent syllable (first, last, penultimate, other
- secondary stress (is it rhythmic
- is it pitch related (pitch pattern over word varies predictably with
stressed
- syllable
Remember to:
- Keep track of phones (make charts as you go along
- Keep track of possible allophones (especially among related sounds
- Attempt to elicit minimal pairs
- MAKE NOTES OF REGULARITIES, THINGS TO CHECK
- To begin with: keep lexical classes separate
As you go along:
- Continue with charts
- Move from list of phones to list of phonemes
- Watch for morphophonemic variation - keep lists of alternations
- Analyze syllable structure
- Construct syllable templates
- Which phones can occur in which position? Constraints?
- Look for constraints on vowel-consonant combinations
2. ELICITING VOCABULARY
Resources:
Swadesh 100 list
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Swadesh_List
http://www.rosettaproject.org/live/search/contribute/swadesh/view?ethnocode=SLO
STEDT (Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus) wordlist
questionaire
http://stedt.berkeley.edu/html/questionnaires.html
Matisoff 200-word list/CALMSEA wordlist (Culturally Appropriate
Lexicostatistical Model for SouthEast Asia)
Lexical Categories
Nouns
Humans
- Basic terms for people
- Kin terms (basic, then more remote)
- Occupations: farmer, butcher, priest, shaman, healer, etc.
- Neighbours
- Body parts
Animals
- Domesticated
- Wild
- Birds
- Fish
- Insects
- Body parts
Natural phenomena
- Rain, hills, rivers, etc.
- Building and implements
- Houses, temples, etc.
- Rooms in houses, etc.
- Clothing, cloth, needle, thread, etc.
- Pots, pans, bottles, ladles, etc.
- Farming implements, ropes, shovels, etc.
Religious objects
- Goddess, god, temple, etc.
- Towns and things in towns
- Roads, alleys, courtyards, markets, wells, etc.
- Other things as appropriate
- Castes, holidays, festivals, days of week, month of year, seasons)
Adjectives
Note: these may be verbs or nouns and not a separate lexical class -
elicit to find out!
Human attributes
- Physical: tall, short, fat, skinny, dark, bald, etc.
- Emotional/psychological: lazy, angry, happy, sad, etc.
Consistency
- Flexible, hard, wet, soft, bumpy, etc.
Colours
May not equate with English colours - use words and coloured objects for
this
Food related terms
- Salty, spicy, sweet, ripe, rancid, bitter, etc.
Verbs
Elicit in simply sentences
Look for a base form (infinitive) - from this you can often elicit a whole
paradigm.
Be sure you have all the paradigms for each verb class.
Adverbs
Easiest to collect from texts and then fill in with elicitation
Demonstratives, particles, etc - fill in based on texts and
elicitation.
3. VERBS AND VERBAL MORPHOLOGY
Note, for Tense/Aspect/Evidentiality/Modality textual materials are
crucial for analysis.
Tense (location the event on the timeline)
- Past
- Non-past
- Future
- Non-future
- Present
- Remote vs. recent past/future (use temporal adverbs, e.g. 'next',
'tomorrow', 'next year')
- Stative (on-going states, past states, future states: 'be a teacher',
'be tall', 'be blind';
You may find past/perfective morphology on entrance into states: 'He
became a teacher'
- Habitual (past/present/future)
Aspect (internal temporal consistency of the event
Perfective (completive)
Imperfective
- Future
- Progressive/continuous
- Habitual
- Stative
- Present
Perfect (English 'had gone', 'have gone', 'will have gone' (3 tenses)
- current relevance
Evidentiality (statement of source of speaker's authority)
May be indexed in the verb morphology or in sentence-final
particles
- Direct perception of event
- Direct perception of resultant state
- Inference
- Hearsay
Modality
Deontic (social modality
- 'should', 'must', 'be appropriate', etc.
Epistemic (real-world physical needs, limitations, etc
- 'need', 'must', etc.)
Number
Singular, dual, paucal, plural
Collective plurals
Morphological status: clitic? suffix? particle?
- What can it attach to?
- What happens if the noun is deleted?
If elements may come after the noun, does the number morpheme follow
them?
Any irregular inflection with case morphology?
Copula Sentences
Existential
Equational
Locational
Possessive
- For each category, work out syntax (how many NPs)
- Check inflections for person, negation, past/present/future
- May inflect like ordinary verbs, or be irregular
- Remember that these are stative by nature
- He was fat - implies no longer
- He became fat - entrance into state)
Case and Verbs
Start by eliciting genitives
- Father's book, top of the table, the cow's horn, the shopkeeper's
son
- Check for distinctions with alienable/inalienable possession
Elicit a simple intransitive verb paradigm (you may elicit pronouns at the
same time
Use 'go' or 'come' but note that they might be irregular
Note casemarking, if any, on the subject
Use a nominal subject first, then check a pronominal subject
Elicit past tense first, then non-past
Check animacy/person distinctions
Add locative elements to the simple intransitive
- Allative: 'to the house'
- Ablative: 'from the house'
- Simple locative: 'on the ground (use 'sit')
Elicit a simple transitive sentence with a human, nominal subject and a
human, nominal object ('took her son', 'dress', 'feed', 'hit')
Expand the number of your predicates
- kill the goat, chicken
- wash or sew clothes
- buy fruit
- cook rice
- cut banana
Make them culturally appropriate, use everyday activities that you see
happening around you.
- Add instrumentals, comitatives
- Elicit ditransitives with 'give'
Downloadable questionnaires and surveys
The Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology has an extremely
comprehensive and informative site, which includes links to questionnaires
and elicitation techniques related to specific research questions.
http://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/files/software_tools.html#datacollection
A Manual of Linguistic Field Work and Indian Language Structures by Anvita
Abbi. (LINCOM Handbooks in Linguistics 17) is a guide to linguistic field
methodology with particular reference to Indian languages. It has a
comprehensive section on elicitation techniques and appendices containing
a number of questionnaires.
After You're Back
Maintaining Contacts
There are many reasons for maintaining contact with your informants and
friends after you've left the field. First, you never know what questions
will come up in the process of your data analysis; some very crucial
problems can only be solved through a re-consultation with your informant.
Second, it's in your best interest to maintain links in case of a
potential follow-up trip, even if that option doesn't seem likely when you
first get back. Third, it's the most ethical decision to give back what
you can to the community that gave you so much (your dissertation data,
for instance?); even if you're not writing a new grammar of the
community's language, some informants may love to see the final write-up
of the data. And finally, in many cases, a good fieldworker will become
so much a part of their community of study that they can't help but
maintain ties with their informants, out of friendship.
Data organization
Grammar writing
A good grammar should be presented clearly, with comprehensive coverage
of the linguistic
phenomena. Make sure you illustrate your descriptions with multiple examples (from texts
where possible) and use clear terminology (include any alternate names by which they may
be known). Cross reference related phenomena in the grammar, and provide standard
interlinear glossing and translation.
Here are some links to conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses:
There are various available guides to good descriptive grammar writing. This is a
useful
comparative study by Jeff Good (University of Pittsburgh and the Max Planck Institute for
Evolutionary Anthropology) of traditional descriptive grammar writing, based on a survey
of four printed grammars:
The DOBES recommendations on language documentation is also a useful site:
Further descriptive grammar writing references include:
Bickford, J. A. Tools for Analyzing the World's Languages: Morphology and Syntax.
Summer
Institute of Linguistics, 1998.
Comrie, Bernard, William Croft, Christian Lehmann, and Dietmar Zaefferer, 1995. A
Framework for descriptive grammars. Bernard Crochetiere et. al (eds.), Proceedings of the
XVth International Congress of Linguistics, vol. 1. Quebec City.
Payne, T. E. 1997. Describing Morphosyntax. A Guide for Field Linguists. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Texts
Identify and tag texts with:
- Language
- Narrator
- Date recorded, transcribed, translated
- Transcriber, translator
Interlinear glossing:
- First line: contains the original language with morpheme boundaries identified
- Second line: morpheme by morpheme translation in alignment with the morphemes of the
first line
- Third line: a more natural translation
Dictionaries
Entries should include:
- Phonological form of lexical item
- Morphological composition
- Glossing
- Source (name of consultant or original text)
- Date recorded and entered into database
- Part of speech
- Lexical cross-referencing
- Any historical observations
- Sociolinguistic and cultural notes
- Example sentences — to illustrate use in context
The best software at the moment for dictionary work is Shoebox.
Dictionary writing references
Ulrike Mosel (Universität Kiel). Dictionary making in endangered speech
communities.
http://www.mpi.nl/lrec/papers/lrec-pap-07-Dictionary_Endangered_SpComm.pdf
(A paper addressing various issues related to lexicographic work in short-term language
documentation projects).
Pawley, Andrew K. Grammarian's lexicon, lexicographer's lexicon: Worlds apart. In
Svartvik, Jan(ed.) Words KVHAA Konferenser 36 (pp. 189-211). Stockholm: Kungl. Vitterhets
Historie och Antikvitets Akademien.
Software and field linguistics tools
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/research/lt/projects/acla-db/
The ACLA-DB is a linguistic database application designed for structured metadata creation
and data management.
Talkbank: Linguistic Annotation
Describes tools and formats for creating and managing descriptive or analytic notations
for language data.
Shoebox
Download site for Shoebox, a data management and analysis tool for the field linguist.
http://www.sil.org/computing/routledge/antworth-valentine/
Software for doing field linguistics
http://fieldling.sourceforge.net/
Tools for field linguists
Claude Barras'
Transcriber
(to transcribe and to link your media and transcript).
http://www.mpi.nl/tools/elan.html
Software produced by the MPI in the Netherlands for transcribing both audio and video.
Ethics
The general enterprise of conducting fieldwork is invariably coloured
by various ethical considerations, relating to such issues as:
- Responsibilities and obligations to one's informant (recompense,
anonymity, acknowledgement)
- Intellectual property rights (e.g. of stories and songs elicited)
- Recompense to the community
- Level of participation in community affairs
- Grant money use
- Making available your field materials to the general linguistic
community
It is a good idea to inform yourself of the various ethical issues that
may arise, before undertaking your fieldwork. The following is a selection
useful literature on the subject, much of it from the field of
anthropology, where the discussion of the ethical dimension in fieldwork
has been particularly prominent. See in particular Hale (1964/65) and,
more recently the introduction to Linguistic Fieldwork (2001) by Newman
and Ratliff, as well as the Toronto, La Trobe, Max Planck sites for
linguistically oriented discussions and guidelines)
Electronic sources
http://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/ethics.php
Ethics guidelines from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary
Anthropology
http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/linguistics/LIN458H1F/04.458.ethics.pdf
PDF file on ethical issues in linguistic fieldwork from the
Linguistics Department, University of Toronto
http://www.latrobe.edu.au/rclt/als/ethics.html
Statement of Ethics put out by the Australian Linguistics Society
http://www.aaanet.org/committees/ethics/ch1.htm
Issues and sources on ethics in anthropological research put out by the
American Anthropological Association
http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/english/index.cfm
Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics (Canada) — promotion
of ethical conduct of research involving humans
Printed material
Ellen, R. F. (ed.) 1984. Ethnographic Research. A Guide to General
Conduct. (ASA Research Methods in Social Anthroplogy) New York: Academic
Press
Fluehr-Lobban, Carolyn (ed.). 1991. Ethics and the Profession of
Anthropology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Greaves, Tom (ed.) 1994. Intellectual Property Rights for Indigenous
Peoples: A Sourcebook. Oklahoma City: Society for Applied
Anthropology.
Hale, Kenneth. 1964/65. On the use of informants in field-work.
Canadian
Journal of Linguistics 10:108-19
King, Nancy M. P., Gail E. Henderson, and Jane Stein (eds.) 1999.
Beyond
Regulations: Ethics in Human Subjects Research. Chapel Hill: University of
North Carolina Press
Koepping, Klaus-Peter (ed.). 1994. Anthropology and Ethics. Fribourg:
Seminaire d'Ethnologie
Mitchel, Richard G., Jr. 1993. Secrecy and Fieldwork. (Qualitative
Research Methods, 29) Newberry Park, CA: Sage.
Newman, Paul and Martha Ratliff. 2001. Introduction. Linguistic
Fieldwork. P. Newman and M. Ratliff (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Penslar, Robin Levin (ed.) 1995. Research Ethics: Cases and Materials.
Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Rynkiewich, Michael A., and James P. Spradley (eds.). 1976. Ethics and
Anthropology: Dilemmas in Fieldwork. New York: John Wiley.
|