|
Stern Toilets Retrofit Project (Burbank,
Casa Zapata, Serra, Donner)
| Project Description |
Low-flush toilets and urinals installed. |
| Total Cost |
$27,780 |
| Water Savings |
860,000 gallons/yr |
| Projected Cost Savings |
$6,287/yr |
Synergy
Solar Panel Project
| Project Description |
Solar photovoltaic system
installed on roof.
|
| Total Cost |
$77,816 |
| Electricity
Savings |
11,164 kWh/yr* |
| First Year Cost
Savings |
$1,978* |
| Total
Savings |
$131,432*
over 30 years |
| Avoided
CO2 |
221
tons over 30 years |
*estimates given by Akeena Solar,
Inc
See
the real-time performance of the Synergy Solar System
Back to Top
Premium
Efficiency Motors Retrofit
| Project Description |
Upgraded motors in Gov
Co, Cowell, Bob, EV Midrises, and Mirrielees with
premium efficiency motors.
|
| Total Cost |
$22,175 |
| Electricity
Savings |
49,336 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$6,660/yr |
| Payback
Period |
3.33
years |
Back to Top
Lighting
Projects
Since every residence has literally
hundreds of light fixtures, much of the work done by the
Energy Coordinator has focused on upgrading these areas.
The reason for this is simple: lighting improvements are
fairly straightforward and often yield significant savings
in both energy and maintenance expenses. Installing new
fixtures improves the atmosphere of a residence, keeping
Student Housing safely and comfortably well-lit. Unlike
homes or offices, in which occupants are present only a
fraction of the day, dorms are in use around the clock.
This often means the lights are switched on 24 hours a day,
seven days a week, making these improvements central to
the department's efforts. Here are some of the lighting
projects the Energy Coordinator's office has completed over
the last few years:
2003
Robert Moore Houses (Bob,
Casa Italiana) & Xanadu Lighting Retrofit
| Project Description |
Incandescent lightbulbs
replaced with compact flourescents. Timed switches
for common area lighting installed.
|
| Total Cost |
$47,890 |
| Electricity
Savings |
72,931 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$9,846/yr |
| Payback
Period |
4.86
years |
Wilbur Lighting Retrofit
| Project Description |
Installed new common area
light fixtures and timed switches in student lounges.
|
| Total Cost |
$59,616 |
| Electricity
Savings |
113,822 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$15,627.73/yr |
| Payback
Period |
3.84
years |
2002
Cowell Cluster Lighting
Retrofit
| Project Description |
T12 lamps replaced
with more efficient T8's in all student rooms. |
| Total Cost |
$22,708 |
| Electricity
Savings |
36,192 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$4,969*/yr |
| Payback
Period |
4.57
yrs* |
Wilbur Hall Lighting Retrofit
| Project Description |
T12 lamps replaced
with more efficient T8's in all student rooms. |
| Total Cost |
$19,384 |
| Electricity
Savings |
20,825 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$5,602/yr* |
| Payback Period |
3.46 yrs* |
Lyman Commons Lighting
Retrofit
| Project Description |
Improved lighting
controls installed in lounge. |
| Total Cost |
$250 |
| Electricity
Savings |
15,623 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$2,145/yr* |
| Payback Period |
1.5 months* |
Roble Lighting Retrofit
| Project Description |
T12 lamps replaced
with more efficient T8's in all common areas. |
| Total Cost |
$18,330 |
| Consumption
Savings |
41,813 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$5,741/yr* |
| Payback Period |
3.19* |
* All savings and payback predictions
for projects completed in 2002 are based on 2002 electricity
rates. Savings may be greater and paybacks may be shorter
because actual electricity rates have increased over time.
2001
Florence Moore Occupancy Sensors
| Project Description |
Occupancy sensors
added to each dining and lounge area. |
| Total Cost |
$7,811 |
| Consumption
Savings |
25,893 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$2,770/yr** |
| Payback Period |
2.82 yrs** |
Governor's Corner Lighting
Retrofit
| Project Description |
T12 lamps replaced
with more efficient T8's in all student rooms. |
| Total Cost |
$25,122 |
| Consumption
Savings |
4,700 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$5,106/yr** |
| Payback Period |
4.92 yrs** |
* All savings and payback predictions
for projects completed in 2001 are based on 2001 electricity
rates. Savings may be greater and paybacks may be shorter
because actual electricity rates have increased over time.
2000
Sterling Quad Lighting Retrofit
| Project Description |
T12 lamps replaced
with more efficient T8's in all student rooms. |
| Total Cost |
$3,623 |
| Consumption
Savings |
11,728 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$805/yr |
| Payback Period |
4.5 yrs* |
* All savings and payback predictions
for projects completed in 2000 are based on 2000 electricity
rates. Savings may be greater and paybacks may be shorter
because actual electricity rates have increased over time.
1999
Storey Lighting Retrofit
| Project Description |
T12 lamps replaced
with more efficient T8's in all common areas. |
| Total Cost |
$4,963 |
| Consumption
Savings |
18,094 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$1,313/yr* |
| Payback Period |
3.78 yrs* |
Roble Outdoor Lighting Retrofit
| Project Description |
Outdoor lighting
retrofit with the installation of HPS and metal halide
lamps. |
| Total Cost |
$1,465 |
| Consumption
Savings |
4,725 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$342/yr* |
| Payback Period |
4.28 yrs* |
EV Lighting Retrofit
| Project Description |
Lamps replaced
in lobbies, exit signs, bedrooms and apartment interior
hallways in Blackwelder, Quillen, Hoskins and the EV
lowrises. |
| Total Cost |
$67,995 |
| Consumption
Savings |
193,223 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$14,020/yr* |
| Payback Period |
4.85 yrs* |
Student Housing Offices Lighting
Retrofit
| Project Description |
All lamps in
565 Cowell and 670/672 Lomita retrofitted to more efficient
models. |
| Total Cost |
$2,562 |
| Consumption
Savings |
8,654 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$628/yr* |
| Payback Period |
4.08 yrs* |
Cluster I Lighting Retrofit
| Project Description |
All lamps in
680 Lomita, SAE, Kappa Sig and Theta Delta Chi retrofitted. |
| Total Cost |
$26,670 |
| Consumption
Savings |
51,405 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$7000/yr* |
| Payback Period |
3.81 yrs* |
Dining Lighting Retrofit
| Project Description |
Lighting retrofits
in Branner, Florence Moore, Kimball, Ricker, Stern,
Wilbur 1st floor, Wilbur basement kitchen and kitchen
areas. |
| Total Cost |
$80,193 |
| Consumption
Savings |
187,910 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$16,168/yr* |
| Payback Period |
4.96 yrs* |
Manzanita and Wilbur Lighting
Retrofit
| Project Description |
Lighting retrofits
in the lounge, kitchen, bathroom, computer cluster and
game room areas in Wilbur and Manzanita. |
| Total Cost |
$38,017 |
| Consumption
Savings |
132,294 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$11,382/yr* |
| Payback Period |
3.34 yrs* |
Lagunita Outdoor Lighting
Retrofit
| Project Description |
Lighting retrofits
in Lagunita Court. |
| Total Cost |
$13,970 |
| Consumption
Savings |
35,560 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$2,991/yr* |
| Payback Period |
4.67 yrs* |
Toyon, Roble, Branner Lighting
Retrofit
| Project Description |
T12 lamps replaced
with more efficient T8's in all student rooms in Toyon,
Roble and Branner. This reduced consumption by over
35%. |
| Total Cost |
$176,716 |
| Consumption
Savings |
302,795 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$36,212/yr* |
| Payback Period |
4.88 yrs* |
* All savings and payback predictions
for projects completed in 1999 are based on 1999 electricity
rates. Savings may be greater and paybacks may be shorter
because actual electricity rates have increased over time.
1998
Toyon, Branner, Lagunita Candelabra
Lighting Retrofit
| Project Description |
Incandescent
candelabra-style lamps replaced with antique-looking
compact fluorescents in common areas in Toyon, Branner
and Lagunita. Predicted to reduce electricity consumption
by 87% and reduce relamping labor by 80%. |
| Total Cost |
$12,258 |
| Consumption
Savings |
79,970 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$6,735/yr* |
| Payback Period |
1.82 yrs* |
Mirrielees Lighting Retrofit
| Project Description |
T12 lamps replaced
with more efficient T8's in all common areas and apartment
interiors. |
| Total Cost |
$77,033 |
| Consumption
Savings |
214,007 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$17,998/yr* |
| Payback Period |
4.28 yrs* |
Small Residence Lighting Retrofit
| Project Description |
T12 lamps replaced
with more efficient T8's in Bob, Xanadu, Casa Italiana,
Columbae, and all Cluster I houses. Expected to decrease
lighting load by 45% and increase fixture lumen output
by 60%. |
| Total Cost |
$22,235 |
| Consumption
Savings |
60,745 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$5,112/yr* |
| Payback Period |
4.35 yrs* |
Rains Lighting Retrofit
| Project Description |
Lamp retrofits
in common areas and all apartment interiors. Again,
expected to decrease lighting load by 45% and increase
fixture lumen by 60%. |
| Total Cost |
$137,184 |
| Consumption
Savings |
335,857 kWh/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$28,227/yr* |
| Payback Period |
4.86 yrs* |
* All savings and payback predictions
for projects completed in 1998 are based on 1998 electricity
rates. Savings may be greater and paybacks may be shorter
because actual electricity rates have increased over time.
1997
Halogen Lamps
Free swaps of halogen lamps for safer, energy-efficient
lamps were conducted in April and June of 1997. Students
trade halogen torchieres for CoolBrite 4000s, a fluorescent
torchiere based on a prototype developed in the Lawrence
Berkeley Laboratory.
CoolBrite 4000s Halogen Lamps
- Use compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) - Use high-energy,
high CO2 and SO2
- Burn at a low 100 degrees F emission incandescent lamps
- 20% brighter than Halogens - Burn at 750 - 1,100 degrees
F
- Use 1/5th of the energy consumed by Halogens!
- As of 1998, halogen-related fires had killed 29 people,
injured 112, and caused more than $2 million in property
damage.
Currently, fluorescent torcheries
are becoming increasingly popular and much more readily
available.
Back to Top
Low-flush
Toilet Replacement
Old Model Toilets need 3.5-5
gallons per flush (gpf), while New Low-Flush Toilets only
use 1.6 gpf! Just changing the toilets can decrease water
usage by 60% or more.
2003
Wilbur Low-Flush Toilet Retrofit
| Project Description |
All old toilets and urinals
in Wilbur replaced with new 1.6 gpf fixtures.
|
| Total Cost |
$58,365 |
| Consumption
Savings |
1,710,618 gals/yr |
| Cost Savings |
$11,512/yr |
| Payback
Period |
5
years |
*Assumes a domestic water rate
of $0.00393/gal and sewer rate of $0.0028/gal.
2001-2002
Water use in the EV Low-rises
has been monitored closely since the toilet retrofit in
June 2001. Here are the results:
|
Savings
(July 2001-June2002)
|
Amount
(gallons/year)
|
|
Projected
|
5,395,000
|
|
Actual
|
7,214,000*
|
*We reached 133% of our goal!
Since the water savings from
low-flow toilets are so attractive and recent advances in
design have increased performance, Student Housing is looking
to convert all toilets in the future. We are currently in
the process of changing over 100 toilets in Wilbur Hall.
Back to Top
Sink Aerator
and Showerhead Replacement
2002
In Summer 2002 the undergraduate
dorms underwent a sink aerator and showerhead
replacement. Currently, the showerheads in the residences
vary from the newer California standard flow rate of 2.5
gpm (gallons per minute), to as much as 6.0 gpm. The new
showerheads will be the California standard 2.5 gpm, but
the newer design allows much higher pressure than typical
low flow heads. The new sink aerators will be 1.5 gpm (an
improvement over the 2.2 and 2.5 gpm current Stanford standards)
and will also be vandal proof. These replacements together
are predicted to save 12,204,104 gallons of water and $82,048
per year! The feedback has been very positive! In Summer
2003 we will be upgrading most graduate apartments in the
same fashion, and we've projected savings of nearly 14 million
more gallons of water.
- New Showerheads
- New specs: 2.5 gpm model from Energy Tech Labs
- # new showerheads: 995 in undergrad residences + Crothers/CroMem
- New Sink Aerators
- New specs: 1.5 gpm model from Neoperl
- # new aerators: 1,902 in undergrad residences + Crothers/CroMem
- Sink and Shower Savings
together
- Projected Water Savings: 12,204,104 gallons per year
- Projected $ Savings: $82,048/yr
Back to Top
Irrigation Improvements
2002
One major area of water use is
irrigation. Irrigation accounts for approximately 10% of
all water used by Student Housing. Currently, Student Housing
is in the process of upgrading its irrigation controls.
The new system, known as Maxicom,
communicates with a central computer over narrowband radio
waves, allowing the system operator to adjust run times
based on daily conditions. This, in effect, enables Student
Housing to optimize the use of water each day. Several of
the features include:
- Flo-Manager: central
computer control of several hundred irrigation stations
- Flo-Watch: check for breaks in the irrigation
lines
- Cycle+Soak: system cycles on and off for short
periods of time to allow the water to soak into the soil
- Rain Watch: no more watering lawns during rain
storms!
The new Maxicom
system is expected to significantly increase watering efficiency
and monitoring. Student Housing has nearly completed retrofitting
this new technology, and it is now the standard for all
new construction on campus.
Back to Top
Contests
2002 Row and Cluster Houses
Energy Contest
In November of 2001, Student
Housing launched an energy contest for the Row and Cluster
Houses. The goal of this contest was to raise campus awareness
of electricity consumption. Twenty-one houses chose to participate
in this four-month-long event. In order to see who conserved
energy most effectively, each house's electrical use was
recorded on a monthly basis and was compared to usage from
the previous year. Occupancy changes from one year to the
next were figured into the calculations, along with variations
in electric meter reading dates.
Phi Sig was the big winner, saving
a whopping 26.9% of their energy use from November through
February! The 8 houses with the largest energy savings were:
Phi Sig, French House, Grove Lasuen, Haus Mitt, Terra, 557
Mayfield, Hammarskjold, and 680 Lomita. Each of these houses
won a new Energy Star refrigerator, free of charge! The
electricity bill for Student Housing decreased by $4,340
thanks to the conservation efforts of all participating
students, which offset the cost of the refrigerators given
to the winners and helped make the contest a big success
for everyone involved.
1992 Save Water Now! Contest
Spring of 1992 saw a return of
the Save Water Now! Contest. Winners this time around were:
Self/Co-op
1st place: EAST House- 218 gal/person/wk
2nd place: Synergy- 223 gal/person/wk
University-op
1st place: Roble- 305 gal/person/wk
2nd place: Branner/Toyon- 322 gal/person/wk
No Kitchen
1st place: Jenkins/Marx- 169 gal/person/wk
2nd place: Robinson- 187 gal/person/wk
Roble Hall went on to donate
$500 of its winnings to The Citizens' Committee to Complete
The Refuge. This money helped the Committee to purchase
Bair Island, a 1200-acre tidal marsh located near Redwood
City which provides habitat for the endangered California
clapper rail and many other estuary-dependent species. East
House helped The Trust for Public Land protect estuarine
habitat with a $300 donation.
1991 Save Water Now! Contest
Due in large part to the six-year
drought that hit California from 1986 to 1992, water conservation
efforts gained widespread momentum during this period. Through
retrofits, awareness campaigns, and contests, Stanford sought
to do its part. In spring quarter, 1991, the Housing Energy
Conservation Center (HECC- now called the Student Housing
Energy and Water Conservation department), with the cooperation
of the Housing and Food Services O&M Department and
the Office of Public Affairs, launched the Save Water Now!
Contest. Participating dorms included Toyon, Branner, Stern,
Florence Moore, Kimball, Governors Corner dorms and houses,
and Row and Cluster houses. These residences were divided
into categories according to the type of kitchen service
their house had: self or co-ops (food service is handled
by the occupants; used only in the row and cluster houses),
University run (kitchens used and food service provided
by Stanford staff), and places with no kitchens included.
Once every week for six weeks, environmental representatives
(E-reps) from each of the participating dorms recorded readings
off of the dorm water meter. Results were measured in terms
of average water consumption per capita. At the end of the
six weeks the winners were:
Self/Co-op
1st place: French House- 60 gal/person/day; 10% savings
University-op
1st place: Branner/Toyon- 43 gal/person/day; 7% savings
No Kitchen
1st place: Paloma/Mirlo- 45 gal/person/day; 15% savings
Prizes included study breaks
from the House of Bagels, Mrs. Fields Cookies, Stanford
Pub- Pizza & Grill, Whole Foods Market, Round Table
Pizza, and Suzanne's Muffins!
Back to Top
Boiler
Replacement
2002
All EV Low Rise hot water boilers
(used for heating apartments and hot water) were replaced
with new more efficient models. The new boilers are expected
to use over 30% less energy than the older inefficient boilers.
A new project to complement this effort will begin in Summer
2003. All EV low-rise apartments use radiant floor heating
to keep spaces warm. While this creates a comfortable atmosphere,
these systems are prone to leaks and costly to run. As a
result, the existing 40-year-old radiant floor heating systems
will be upgraded to hydronic systems that give the user
more control and operate more efficiently.
Back to Top
Summer
and Winter Break Shutdowns
2001-2002
Beginning in 2001 Student Housing started shutting down
the major utilities in unoccupied residences. A significant
amount of energy is saved by turing off all of the lights,
hot water, and heat in these buildings at the main controls.
The 2001-2002 winter break shutdowns saved an estimated
$75,000. Additionally, Student Housing is asking students
to unplug refrigerators and turn off computers while they
are gone, adding to the savings.
Back to Top
Fairs
Earth Week 1997:
Stanford Housing encouraged students
to switch from Halogen Lamps to safer, more environment-friendly
lamps. At the time there were over 2,000 halogens in Stanford
residences.
Stanford University banned halogen
lamps from use on campus in the fall of 1997.
April 3, 1992- Water Fair
Who: Put on by Stanford
Operations and Maintenance Department.
Where: White Plaza
When: April 3rd, 1992
Why: Raise awareness about water conservation issues!
What: Information booths and product demonstrations
and displays:
- American Air & Water Council
- SF Water Department
- Boething Treeland Farm
- Urban Farmer Store
- Stanford Operations & Maintenance Utilities
- Stanford Recycling Center
Presentations included,
among others:
- "The Status of the Hetch Hetchy"
- "Campus Water Update"
- "Drought Tolerant Landscaping"
Back to Top
|
|