Unit 1: Components of a print advertisement
Organization


22 Mastercard

An Image usually has some interpretational component which guides the reader to certain aspects of meaning. Have a good look at 22 Mastercard, and make sure you read the text. With regard to this advertisement, we conducted an informal survey with 30 people, asking them two questions:

• Is this is a scene of someone moving in or moving out?

• Is the person seen in the Image the friend, or the holder of the Mastercard?

While we are not claiming that each of these questions has to have a definite answer, provided by the advertisement, we were interested to see what specific interpretations readers would take if explicitly asked to do so. Here are the results:

(1) Moving in: 26

(2) Moving out: 4


(3) Person = friend: 24

(4) Person = card-holder: 3

(5) Really couldn't tell: 3


Most people picked interpretation (1), and there seem to be two main reasons for this, both of which are visual clues: (a) the room looks too clean and bare for someone to be moving out (there should be more junk, brooms,
etc.); (b) the physical posture of the person seems to be one of coming up the stairs into the house, therefore bringing the sofa in. Both of these are properties of the Image itself.

Those who picked (2) seem to focus on an idea of some "bright future" being beyond the door where the sofa is being taken; this is also a property of just the Image.

The majority of people also picked (3), and this seems to be because the friend is mentioned in the Text: it appears to be a relevance effect---why mention the friend and then show someone else?

For the people who picked (4), they probably focussed on the second-person perspective of the whole advertisement---it is from Mastercard to you, so that's you in the picture.

Both of these interpretations involve the relevance of the Text component of the advertisement to the Image.

So, now we can consider how an advertisement would function if it were (to be) any of these variations:

-- similar to 22 Mastercard but:

(a) the Text mentions someone's name (e.g. "Jack finally had a free afternoon").

(b) it is meant to be for a moving company (e.g. imagine the person in the picture in a uniform) rather than Mastercard.

(c) it is meant to indicate someone moving out (for instance, it is meant to connote that the former occupants are moving up to a bigger house and have the financial support of a bank, which helps people realize their dreams).

These "what-ifs" illustrate the way that we analyze advertisements: changing some part to see if we can discern how that part functions.

References  

Mastercard, Rolling Stone, March 28, 2002, p.65.

 

<home>