New and Hot
Socioeconomic,
environmental, and behavioural risk factors for
leprosy in
Kerr-Pontes., et al. Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Apr 27
This interesting study suggests that lower
socio-economic status (defined by less education), bathing in a body of open
water, and lack of changing bedding were all risk factors in those who
contracted leprosy in
With scores still
infected,
Padma, TV. Nature Medicine
29 March 2006
Although
The role of BCG in
prevention of leprosy: a meta-analysis.
Setia MS, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006 Mar;6(3):162-70.
A meta-analysis of 26 studies (7 experimental, 19
observational) reveals that the tuberculosis BCG vaccine provides a protective
effect of 25% in experimental studies, and 61% in observational studies. The article suggests that re-vaccination with
the BCG vaccine may prove to be an important way to control leprosy in heavily
endemic areas.
Multi-centre, double
blind, randomized trial of three steroid regimens in the treatment of type-1
reactions in leprosy.
Rao, PS., et al. Lepr Rev. 2006 Mar;77(1):25-33
It is currently unclear how long steroid treatment
should be provided to those who develop leprosy reactions during the course of
treatment. This study, conducted in
Treatment of leprosy:
science or politics?
Naafs, B. Trop Med Int Health.
2006 Mar;11(3):268-78.
This
scathing article is critical of World Health Organization efforts to eliminate
and eradicate leprosy. The author notes that the WHO helps “eliminate” leprosy
by virtue of changing its case definitions and treatment regimens, and provides
a convincing argument that the WHO’s over-simplification of leprosy treatment
could be detrimental in the fight against leprosy. The article discusses the
controversial WHO recommendation to lower the length of treatment for all
leprosy patients to 6 months in 2002, which resulted in significant outcry by
public health communities. The author finds significant fault with the WHO case
definition of leprosy, recommended treatment length and appropriate steroid use
for leprosy reactions—all in all, an excellent contrast to the bright and happy
picture usually seen in most public health textbooks.