Google

Search WWW
Search Inquirer

 

Home

The Cardinal Inquirer
http://inquirer.stanford.edu
A Publication of the Stanford Graduate Program in Journalism

Home > Authors > Bringing Light To U.S. Imperialism’s History In The Philippines

Bringing Light To U.S. Imperialism’s History In The Philippines
By Benedict Dimapindan
January 22, 2005

The Philippines and U.S. Imperialism

Kawal Ulanday strolled into the classroom with his long black hair tied in a ponytail that dangled down to the small of his back. He was sporting a caramel-colored T-shirt with bold white letters emblazoned on the front that read, “U.S. TROOPS OUT OF THE PHILIPPINES.”

Ulanday didn’t exactly fit the typical image of a history teacher.

But for the dozen in attendance, which included students from Stanford, the University of Nevada, UC Berkeley and a visiting professor from New York University, Ulanday gave them a lesson in history and current events that they very likely wouldn’t soon forget. It was a lesson that’s “not written in any history books here,” he said.

Ulanday, chairman of the Filipino-American political activist group Bayan-USA, led a discussion titled, “The Philippines and U.S. Imperialism,” at Stanford’s ninth annual “Listen to the Silence” Asian American community issues conference on Saturday. He used politically charged rhetoric – calling Philippine President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo a “puppet who needs no strings” and saying U.S. imperialism spells “poverty, corruption, plunder and a backwards economy” for countries like the Philippines – to inform attendees about the political restiveness in his homeland and to explain the National Democratic Movement taking place there.

That movement has attracted millions of Filipinos throughout the archipelago, Ulanday said, and has recently forged a U.S. counterpart, Bayan-USA.

History of imperialism

But the roots of this movement run deep. Since the 16th Century, lasting almost 400 years, the Philippines was a colony of the Spanish, who systematically claimed vast expanses for their haciendas, or estates, leaving the indigenous farmers landless. In December of 1898, Spain ceded control of the Philippines to the United States for $20 million as negotiated in the Treaty of Paris, formally ending the Spanish-American War.

“These Europeans were in Paris signing off the destiny of islands in a whole other place,” Ulanday said.

From February 1899 to July 1902, the often-forgotten Philippine-American War claimed 250,000 lives, and as a result of the conflict, the United States had asserted its strength in Asia. The Philippines remained a U.S. territory until it was granted independence in 1946. But throughout Spain’s rule to that of the Unites States, Filipinos had continuously sought to organize covertly and rid the country of foreign occupiers.

The Post-Colonial climate

Even today, activists claim that although the Philippines is no longer under U.S. control, the effects of imperialism still linger.

“The economy is backwards, it’s export-oriented,” Ulanday said. “It’s a country that’s got incredible mass natural resources, raw materials. Instead of being able to be industrialized and create its own workforce, what we have is an export-oriented economy, where it exports all of those resources, including human labor itself.

“It’s backwards because if we have everything here to make steel and to make electronics, then why are we selling those things for very cheap to international companies who sell us back the finished product at a multiplied price. That forces the Philippines to take out loans from the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization that are very hard to pay back.”

The economy has declined so sharply that the rate of conversion is currently 55.4 pesos to one U.S. dollar. In addition, more than 2,000 Filipinos flee the country each day in search of work, many even heading to war-torn nations, according to Migrante International, a global alliance of Filipino migrant organizations.

In response to the worsening politico-economic situation in the Philippines, the National Democratic Movement emerged.

The movement is divided into two sides – the New People’s Army (NPA) and the Bayan, of which Ulanday spearheads the U.S. chapter.

The NPA is a militaristic group of farmers and peasants in the countryside that have chosen to bear arms against the Philippine army, which has taken their land and ravaged their families, Ulanday said. “That’s the underground level and that’s illegal,” he added.

In fact, then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell officially labeled the NPA a terrorist group in a “Designation of a Foreign Terrorist Organization” report released in August 2002. State Department Deputy Spokesman Adam Ereli re-designated the NPA a foreign terrorist organization six months ago.

“I am announcing the designation of the Communist Party of the Philippines/New People’s Army (CPP/NPA) as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, as defined under U.S. law,” Powell said in the August 2002 report. “I made this decision in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury after an exhaustive review of this group's violent activities.

”The CPP, a Maoist group, was founded in 1969 with the aim of overthrowing the Philippine government through guerilla warfare. CPP’s military wing, the New People’s Army, strongly opposes any U.S. presence in the Philippines and has killed U.S. citizens there. The group has also killed, injured, or kidnapped numerous Philippine citizens, including government officials.”

Bayan, however, is comprised of millions of people in the Philippines, represented by youth and student organizations, workers’ unions, farmers and women’s organizations.

“Bayan is what we’re part of,” Ulanday said. “We’re legal and above ground – and we’re not trying to be illegal, underground. We come from all different sectors, but we all fight under the national democratic struggle of the Philippines.”

Bayan and its National Democratic Movement has been actively working toward an overhaul – a revolution, it seems – of Philippine politics, particularly because of the alleged human rights violations and the re-emergence of the U.S. military in the archipelago during President Macapagal-Arroyo’s tenure.

Karapatan, a Filipino human rights organization, released a report that said it had chronicled 570 human rights violations afflicting 9,924 people – about 52 incidents per month – from January through November 2004. In the first three years of the Macapagal-Arroyo administration, 3,488 human rights violations were reported and documented, according to the report.

Macapagal-Arroyo’s visit to the Bay Area this past November prompted 75 protesters to gather outside St. Ignatius Church where she was being awarded an honorary degree from the University of San Francisco and publicly impugn her human rights record.

Further galvanizing the contempt of activists has been the U.S. military’s return to the Philippines. The Visiting Forces Agreement, or VFA, paved the way for an American comeback, but it has also served as a hot-button point of contention for activists.

First, the Philippine constitution prohibits “nuclear weapons in its territory,” but the VFA doesn’t guarantee a right of inspection of U.S. military craft. Second, activists claim that the VFA seemingly indoctrinates extraterritoriality. The text of the VFA states, “Recognizing the responsibility of the United States military authorities to maintain good order and discipline among its forces, Philippine authorities will, upon request by the United States, waive their primary right to exercise jurisdiction except in cases of particular importance to the Philippines.”

“A lot of people might say that the Philippines being heavily militarized by U.S. troops is OK because the Philippine army is weak and we need good protection, and it’s kind of good to have U.S. presence there and make us safe,” Ulanday said. “But when you really look at the situation, what ends up happening is human rights violations go way up, because these treaties give them immunity to so many things. It’s so unfair.”

In January 2002, about 660 U.S. soldiers arrived in the southern region of the islands to train the Philippine counterterrorist regiment to combat the Abu Sayyaf, a small group of Muslim rebels with suspected ties to Al Qaeda. Over the next year, the number of American troops had jumped to more than 1,200.

In addition, Macapagal-Arroyo administration has received approximately $400 million in military assistance from Washington since 2001. According to the U.S. Embassy in Manila, the Philippines has become the top recipient of American military aid in Asia and fourth largest beneficiary in the world.

Contact Benedict Dimapindan at bend1@stanford.edu

Go Back

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
©2004 Graduate Program in Journalism, Department of Communications, Stanford University